Another frontal assault from the McCain presidential campaign:
Six months after Ex-MA Gov. Mitt Romney was convinced by a Harvard doctor that (a) Harvard doctors can be crass and (b) life began at conception, he reiterated his promise to Massachusetts voters that he would not fiddle with the state's abortion laws.
Contradiction? I wrote about Romney's conversion for National Journal and came away with the impression that the Harvard incident began the process, rather than ended it -- that it took time before Romney fully came to realize that the pro-life position was correct.
Also, Romney has always claimed that, even after his personal revelation, he never went back on his promise to Massachusetts voters.
Update:
A Romney spokesman e-mails a response:
“Governor Romney is firmly pro-life and can rely on his record of having protected the sanctity of life when faced with those issues as governor."Governor Romney consistently maintained, in an effort to protect the sanctity of life, that he would fight attempts to weaken the state’s existing abortion laws. Maintaining existing laws in a state like Massachusetts was an important fight in and of itself.
It’s very troubling that the McCain campaign would attack the governor’s pro-life stance by trying to alter the context of a statement made at a news conference where he also made a passionate case for his veto of stem cell legislation that showed a level of disregard for the sanctity of human life.
The McCain campaign’s motives are obviously borne of desperation. Their actions are both sad and unfortunate.”
:
| 
Mitt made his view clear in an op-ed piece in the Boston Globe.
http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/women/articles/2005/07/26/why_i_vetoed_contraception_bill/
Posted by bjalder26 | June 13, 2007 6:48 PM