« Clinton Wins A Round: The DoD Is Planning For Drawndown | Main | Exodus Continues: More Staff To Leave Team Thompson »

Gingrich Responds: "Pygmies" Taken Out Of Context

26 Jul 2007 01:27 pm

Newt Gingrich insists that he didn't call the lot of Republican presidential candidates a "pathetic" bunch of "pygmies" and instead was the victim of a reporter who did not understand his historical reference.

On Tuesday, the D.C. Examiner's Bill Sammon wrote that he pressed Gingrich to address "

whether his political baggage renders him unelectable, Gingrich compared himself to a famous French statesman. "This is like going to De Gaulle when he was at Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises during the Fourth Republic and saying, 'Don't you want to rush in and join the pygmies?'" he said."

Professor Gingrich strikes back, courtesy of his press secretary, Rick Tyler.

It was clear to anyone in the room that when Gingrich said, “This is like going to De Gaulle when he was at Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises during the Fourth Republic and saying, 'Don't you want to rush in and join the pygmies?” that he was referring to the French analogy of a broken political system and not any of the candidates running for President.

More from Tyler:

Gingrich as a young man lived in France under de Gaulle and earned a Ph.D. in modern European history. His comparison, which Sammon ignored, was significant and relevant to today’s dysfunctional political process and government bureaucracies.

This line is especially brutal:

Sammon either did not understand the reference or he chose to quote Gingrich out of context. I am inclined to believe the latter because Bill is a smart person.


You can read the whole letter to the Examiner after the jump.

The Washington Examiner

Washington, DC

Dear Editor,

Bill Sammon’s piece along with its headline, “Newt Gingrich goes nuclear” (The Examiner - July 23, 2007) presents yet another example of how our political process is broken.

In a recent hour-long newsmaker interview with reporters, Newt Gingrich when asked by Bill about joining the presidential race made a simple historical analogy. He likened his interest in joining the race in its current form to former French President Charles de Gualle’s interest in returning to political life under the French Fourth Republic, a political and governing system which he disdained.

Sammon either did not understand the reference or he chose to quote Gingrich out of context. I am inclined to believe the latter because Bill is a smart person.

Gingrich as a young man lived in France under de Gaulle and earned a Ph.D. in modern European history. His comparison, which Sammon ignored, was significant and relevant to today’s dysfunctional political process and government bureaucracies.

For twelve years de Galle unwaveringly opposed the Fourth French Republic. He despised the ruling elites of the permanent governing class. They had no new ideas, no creativity, and no solutions. Their failed political leadership, lack of seriousness, political games, and constantly shifting coalitions led to an unmitigated political mess, compounded by a governmental structure that didn’t work.

The Fourth Republic ended after military disaster in Indochina in 1954 and the subsequent loss of the war in Algeria. Herein is the significance of the Gingrich analogy unreported by Sammon.

Last week, a snowman was allowed to ask a question about global warming to serious candidates by way of a YouTube video. We have reduced a presidential debate to a TV game show similar to ‘Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader’. This is no way to choose the leader of the free world.

The de Gaulle illustration is fitting. De Galle understood that to solve France’s innumerable problems and return it to prominence on the world stage, would required dramatic reforms that could not be realized from within the then failing political system. He boldly called for real change and in 1958, de Gaulle lead the creation of France’s Fifth Republic which survives today.

Similarly, in order to solve America’s seemingly intractable problems, what is needed at the core of the presidential race are bold solutions and bold leadership that transcend the constraints of partisan political posturing.

It was clear to anyone in the room that when Gingrich said, “This is like going to De Gaulle when he was at Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises during the Fourth Republic and saying, 'Don't you want to rush in and join the pygmies?” that he was referring to the French analogy of a broken political system and not any of the candidates running for President.

Sammon shortchanged his readers by choosing to ignore the important comparison, and choosing instead to quote Gingrich out of context all for the sake of horserace politics.

Rick Tyler

Press Secretary for Newt Gingrich

Washington, DC

Comments (13)

Here's the context, which speaks for itself:

Q: “A lot of people say, you know, he’s the most brilliant guy that could be considered for this, and yet he has baggage that might make him unelectable. How to you address that fundamental objection?”

A: “I don’t. That’s not my problem. I’ll take the first half of his sentence and suggest you watch the six-hour briefing. It’s not my problem. This is like going to De Gaulle when he was at Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises during the Fourth Republic and saying, 'Don't you want to rush in and join the pygmies?' I have no interest in the current political process. I have no interest in trying to figure out how I can go out and raise money under John McCain’s insane censorship rules.”

So Gingrich isn't calling the other Republicans pygmies but he is calling for a new Constitution?

Gingrich obviously was comparing himself to De Gaulle, so it's hardly a stretch to conclude that he was also comparing his political rivals to pigmies. It was he who introduced the term "pymies" in the first place. He wasn't quoting anyone. The ponderous historical background and subtext that Rick provides is irrelevant.

And, since Newt sees fit to compare himself to De Gaulle, let me observe that Newt is shorter, fatter, and vainer than Charles, and he's had more wives. Oh, and he's never been in combat.

The text does speak for itself as Sammon suggests, but it does not support what he wrote in The Examiner. The first line in Sammon's July 23 piece is, "Dismissing the GOP presidential field as a 'pathetic' bunch of 'pygmies,' Newt Gingrich hinted Monday he might step in to beat Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama."

Not only did Gingrich not say this, but notice the sentence following the sentence where Sammon reported that Gingrich had referred to the "candidates" as "pygmies". It reads, "I have no interest in the current political process."

Gingrich is clearly talking about a "political process" that is broken and NOT the candidates as Sammon reported and was subsequently re-reported by reporters not in the room. There were more than a dozen reporters present at the newsmaker roundtable that morning. Only Sammon got it wrong.

You can listen to and read Gingrich's entire answer to Sammon’s question on his website, newt.org, and you can also read that Gingrich has been saying the same thing about the political process consistently over the last two years.

my best mp3 goa music download library ;)

shop zithromax welcome

shop zithromax welcome

shop zithromax welcome

ultram

xanax

blodulv

earshot

stromkern

industrial