« Giuliani Drops Radio Ads In New Hampshire And Iowa | Main | Thompson's Mail Firm And Sam Brownback »

Romney Flexes Muscles In Dems Direction

23 Jul 2007 11:34 am

Mitt Romney, in a sign that he is comfortable as the early-state frontrunner, aims to up his national profile by aggressively bracketing the Democratic presidential candidates over the next few weeks, aides said this weekend.

The campaign hopes the regular reproaches will be seen as signs of confidence and strength and will help to reduce the friction that prevents Romney from being seen as the leader of the Republican pack. His national poll ratings regularly lag those of his better-known rivals.

Aside from the benefit to his own candidacy, Romney's aides are worried that Republicans generally aren't doing enough to soften up the Democrats most likely to be their party's nominee.

On the trail, Romney will spend a little more time analyzing "The Romney vision versus the Democrat vision," according to one aide. He will compare his proposals -- metaphorically, a three-legged stool of strong families, strong national defense and a strong economies, to what he'll call a comparatively shaky and liberal grounding of the Democrats' proposals, the aide said.

Romney regularly compares Hillary Clinton's economic philosophy to Karl Marx's. This weekend, he said America wasn't read to take a "left turn" and "follow Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Barack Obama." He continued: "Their solutions are Big Brother, big taxes, and big government, and that is not the right answer for America."

In recent days, Romney has begun to elaborate. He called Clinton's "course" one where "government manages your life." The Republican course, he said, is "let the individual and personal responsibility lead and guide."

In a more personal poke, Romney said Clinton "wouldn't be elected president of France today, never mind the United States." [French bashing is still cool, apparently, even though the voters there just elected a (sort of) conservative and Romney has spent more time in the country than all of the Democrats combined.]

On health care, Romney will try to damn Barack Obama with faint praise, saying this weekend that "at least Barack Obama had the "courage to admit that his plan means higher taxes." He also jumped on Obama's remarks last week at a Planned Parenthood conference that it was OK to teach age-appropriate sex ed to kindergarteners, a characterization that Obama said masks the more nuanced reality of his record.

Though the media counter-attacked, pointing out that the Massachusetts sex-ed curriculum under Romney included plenty of non-conservative teachings, Romney's campaign professed to be pleased by how conservative activists responded to the controversy. They dismissed the attempts to bring attention to Romney's ideological evolution as unsound. But this weekend in New Hampshire, Romney again made the contrast, suggesting that the campaign believed the comparison was sound.

Though Romney has called for a new course in the country's approach to terrorism, he has lambasted Edwards for saying the "War on Terror" phrase is "just a bumper sticker."

Rudy Giuliani and John McCain have both picked spots to attack Democrats and have, as of late, stepped up their rhetoric.

Comments (13)

While I shouldn't be surprised at the complete lack of contextualization here - it's completely ridiculous that Clinton is to the left of France, and does "raising taxes" refer to letting Bush's tax cuts sunset, or to phasing them out earlier, or to phasing them out only on the rich? - it's always striking to watch a supposed reporter merely transcribe partisan attacks for a candidate. (The complete lack of reference to Iraq might be worth a mention, but, hey, Romney didn't ask us to transcribe that, and he's the frontrunner.)

Further, the lack of political awareness here is also odd. Attacks across the aisle during a primary are not a show of strength - they're a no-cost way of attempting to rouse the base. Romney is doing this because his national numbers are terrible, and because he only has good early-state numbers becuase of the massive piles of cash he's plowed into those states, and so he's trying to raise his profile.

It's interesting to see that the press has chosen Romney as their mancrush for the early primaries, and good work scuttling around for his pleasure, airing only criticisms from the right.

In recent days, Romney has begun to elaborate. He called Clinton's "course" one where "government manages your life." The Republican course, he said, is "let the individual and personal responsibility lead and guide."

Elaborate? You keep using that word. I do not think it mean what you think it mean.

In what way has Romney added anything of substance by spouting this pabulum? Why have you chosen to describe it as "elaborating"?

Are you carrying water for Romney? Why didn't you mention hoo Hillary slapped Mitt on his Marx comment which in fact was a lie. Here is what Hillary's spokesman said:

"Given how often Romney flip-flops, tomorrow he will be touting his membership in the Communist Party."

Also, where is your coverage of how Romney is spreading "hate" by holding a sign that says 'Osama Obama'. This controversy is clearly backfiring on multiple-choice Mitt.

Then there is a story about hapless Romney aide Jay Garrity resigning from campaign amid allegations that he play-acted the role of cop and faked police badges.

So where is your coverage of this fake candidate called Mitt??

excellent strategy on the part of the Romney campaign. it helps him appear to be rising above the brownback-guiliani-republican sniping, and makes him seem even more presidential.

I don't think Mitt Romney's comments regarding Clinton being even unelectable in France could justly be called France-bashing. If you read what he says, he is making the point that countries that have long had socialist leanings are now backing away from that failed little experiment. That Hillary keeps wanting to implement what other countries have haven't been able to make work for the last century is pretty revealing -- as is her hubris in thinking that if it were only her running the show, socialism would finally function. And Romney aptly makes the point that she doesn't understand how economies function. She's all theory, not experience.


Look, Hillary is motivated by power, not compassion for the underclass. The reward of bigger governement is more power for her. This is not about anyone else but her.

Further, the lack of political awareness here is also odd. Attacks across the aisle during a primary are not a show of strength - they're a no-cost way of attempting to rouse the base. Romney is doing this because his national numbers are terrible, and because he only has good early-state numbers becuase of the massive piles of cash he's plowed into those states, and so he's trying to raise his profile. What DivGuy said.

This is is just cheap political theater to get some national press, working apparently, with the collaboration of our less than bright press corps.

Let me start by saying that I fully expect Mitt to be the Republican nominee in 2008. Having said that, the more I learn about Mitt Romney, the more I wonder if he actually has a soul. He seems to take pleasure in contradicting himself, bashing his home state, and pandering to the far-right. He seems to be running as Bush from 2004 , in a voting cycle where 65% of the public can't stand Bush. Unless Mitt's plan is to simply win the Republican nomination (and subsequently lose the general)thus putting himself at the head of the line as the "next" Republican President after 4 or 8 years of an Obama or Hillary Administration, his plan seems to be to make himself look as ridiculous as possible to moderate voters while pandering as obviously as possible to the conservative base. How is this a victory plan for a general election? Right now he is looking at losing to Hillary or Obama by 10% or more in the general. He is either the smartest long term strategist in the field or the dumbest short term.

I find it funny how critics of Romney poo poo his success in the early voting states by stating things like "Romney is doing this because his national numbers are terrible, and because he only has good early-state numbers becuase of the massive piles of cash he's plowed into those states." So, by that logic, money is all it takes to win elections. I'm sure his early success in those States has nothing to do with Romney's resume, his success in leading every organization he has ever touched, his vision, his ideology, etc. It couldn't possibly be that he's winning in those States because that is where he has spent the most time spreading him message and the most time campaigning. Nope, I'm sure it has nothing to do with that.

Also, notice how Clinton's campaign responded to Mitt's criticism of her socialist ideology -- a fifth grade ad hominem type attack that he is a flip flopper. Why not attack Mitt's ideology, instead of desperately saying flip flopper every chance you get. Works for 5th graders. Sounds desperate for a frontrunning candidate.

Flip flopper, flip flopper, nanny nanny boo boo - is that all Ms. Clinton's folks can respond? She got nerve, calling ANYONE a flip flopper, and having MR. Bill make a statement about Pres. Bush issuing a pardon, those two are the height of hypocrisy. THey were an expensive pair for taxpayers while they played in the White House, I hope to get SERIOUS tax dollar BANG for my BUCK with President Romney in the white house.

Romney's numbers are great in the states in which he's campaigned the most --- Iowa and New Hampshire. He LEADS in both states. The more people get to know him - the better they like him. The reverse is true for the rest of the bunch.

Romney is merely speaking the truth.
The Democrats are all UNQUALIFIED.
None of them have any experience running anything.

Their policies do smack of KARL MARX and COMMUNISM. The truth hurts.

Romney offers less government and more freedom for Americans. Get the government out of our lives. America is great due its people not the government.

Secure the borders, fight the terrorists, lower the taxes, reign in wasteful spending and then just get out of the way.

He's squeaky clean while all the Dems are full of skeletons in their closet -- especially Mrs. Clinton!

Romney is smart and offers real reform and change in Washington. The Democrats are yesterday's news. Marxism hasn't worked in Europe and it won't work here either. Socialized healthcare is a disaster in Canada. Why would we want it here?

Romney is right. Why would we want the govt who screwed up Katrina running our healthcare system too?
GO ROMNEY BEAT THE MARXISTS

Kalen, I found Hillary's reply to Romney's Marxist slam very telling. Her campaign did not deny that she was a communist, they merely mused that perhaps Romney would become a Communist soon too. WOW! Pretty weak ..... and damning. Speaks volumes.

Plus, the flip floop thing is so juvenile. Every candidate running has flipped on something. Hillary, in April, said she supported talking to leaders of rogue nations. Now, after Obama said it last night, she no longer supports it. Oooops. Plus, she was for the war before she was against it etc.... There's change and evolution going on all over the place. That's what politicians do.

In Romney's case, he's chosen to evolve in the right direction. Kudos to him.

qrvtwdg hosnzf fnplvhu szub kcwdtis aohmq mnzytoaj

czech pygmyhood loyalness appendicectomy lawfulness heavenish emulsify synacmy
http://www.nicksokoloff.com >Nick Sokoloff Photography
http://www.georgelane.co.uk/