« Obama's Foreign Policy Voice Is Called Up | Main | Yet More On That South Carolina Poll »

Obama's Team Not Happy With The CNN/ORC

20 Jul 2007 12:55 pm

This is not a good South Carolina poll for Sen. Barack Obama, and his advisers are already beginning to push back a little.

"First, this poll is clearly an outlier from all the other public polls in SC," an adviser tells me.

Second, whites make up 53% percent of the sample, which is "just wrong," the adviser said. "Blacks make up a slight plurality." And the pollster "has such small samples here that your margin of error is really large on groups that make up roughly 50% of the electorate."

Obviously, the voter screen is important too. Primary turnout is generally about 15% of the eligible adult population. CNN interviewed 1,052 adults and filtered a sample of about 380 of them.

The adviser wouldn't say whether Obama's private South Carolina polling conflicts with the public poll, but, well, given the push back, I'd say that it does.

Comments (11)

I don't know what the Obama campaign is looking at, of course, but I stand by what I wrote in a thread below. Given where we are in the cycle, I think this poll is pretty good news. If the campaign has internal data that's better, then that's even better.

Marc responded to my email thusly:

"I write to inspire passion, not to temper it."


Well, to quote Chris Farley: "La di FREAKing da!"

and who runs the OPC poll?

However, we've already had a few folks chime in to remind us that the owner of Opinion Research is none other than InfoUSA, which is owned by Clinton supporter Vinod Gupta. And the Obama campaign says they're laughing at these results. "Our grassroots effort in South Carolina is moving at a historic pace. We couldn’t feel better about the energy and enthusiasm for Obama in the Palmetto State," a spokesman tells First Read.

From NBC's Chuck Todd and Mark Murray

It is not really ethical for CNN to use a polling company that is owned by a major backer of one of the candidates. It is even less ethical for them to use a company that has one of the candidates spouses hired as a consultant!

According to Hillary's financial disclosure form, the parent company of Opinion Research (Info USA) paid Bill Clinton $200,000 for a speech in July, 2001. Bill is also listed as a consultant, and allegedly has been paid $3.3 million by the company. Hillary's forms list Bill as a getting "nonemployee compensation", but do not specify the amount he was paid.

At some point the ethical considerations of Hillary serving as a Senator while Bill is paid $41 million ($41,000,000) by various special interest groups, PACs, and companies is going to be an issue for her.

We have known for a fact that these polls are not accurate. They are made up to give an impression that Hillary is doing well. She is not. Hillary is not doing better than John Edward. The campaign team of Hillary has been keeping secret their total number of donors which is perhaps the best gauge to use at this stage of the election.

I'm an extremely loyal person, who's not deterred by negativities.
Having good judgement means that when you've endorsed a candidate, you stand by them irrespective of negativities. That's why I wouldn't be concerned about polls, however positive or negative.

In january, I will support Barack Obama in the caucus in Iowa. Period!
If Obama were not in the Race, I would vote for Edwards. I'm yet to meet one person offline who plans to vote fot Hillary. these polls are just trumped to play with people's psychology.

August 4th: Barack Obama Visibility Birthday Bash

HEADS UP!!! Obama Supporters

On Saturday August 4th, we will be honoring Senator Barack Obama’s birthday by throwing "Barack Obama Visibility Birthday Bash" events all across the country.

See details at IrishAmericansForObama dot com: http://www.IrishAmericansForObama.com/barack_obama_birthday,html

The South Carolina poll was done by Opinion Research, a company owned by Vinod Gupta, owner of Info USA. Bill Clinton is a paid advisor to Info USA and has allegedly (in court documents) been paid over $3,000,000 in consulting fees. Part of the $41 million that he made since leaving office was a speech before Info USA -- for $200,000. So this is basically a poll by a company about one of their employees.

The poll is quite shady. They interviewed over 1000 people and selected 380 of the responses. Breaking it out you have:

148 people for Clinton
95 people for Obama
57 for Edwards
38 for Gore
11 for the other candidates

kmhjsewza vxzwejb ramcsfqz kduobc rxfgpwh dgikqmpyc moywapvq