« Hillary Clinton's First Ad | Main | FairTax.Org Responds »

No One Like Karl Rove

13 Aug 2007 04:01 pm

There's so much to be said about this incredible, maligned, admired figure.

Six and A Half Years

It's an awfully long time to be a senior White House official. Were there any Reagan adviser-lifers? The only Clinton lifer who comes to mind is Patti Solis Doyle, who spent eight years with Hillary Clinton. (Update: there were plenty of Clinton lifers, it turns out: Shalala, Reno, Browner and Babbitt, Bruce Lindsey, Gene Sperling, Sandy Berger, Bruce Reed and others.)

The Legacy

The Atlantic Joshua Green (who can, incidentally, be seen on every television program known to man today) makes a compelling case that Rove's obsession with realignment theory led to a fundamental misreading of government -- and that to the extent that history judges him poorly, it's the result of choices he made. A bigger question Green raises: to what extent were Rove's political successes a side effect of exogenous events like 9/11 and the fecklessness of the Democratic Party before the Iraq war? In other words: to what degree were Rove's problems a result of Bush's choices?

The Intellect

Was Rove a dabbler? A lumper? A splitter? Did he have a Whig view of history or a Tory view of history? Did he read widely and deeply or widely and superficially? How often did he change his mind?

The Press

Boy, did Karl Rove get in his gut the biases, predilections, worldviews, habits, ticks and insecurities of the national media. The first Bush campaign -- and the administration in the first few years -- consciously worked the press as simply another agent of influence. Another part of Rove's realignment theory: delegitimize, decertify and discombobulate the press; control it with psychological power; reduce its influence on the political process.

Rove in particular knew how to massage the egos of high-powered analysts, and these Rove hagiographers ought to be ready to evaluate Rove, now, in the twilight of the career. But it's to Rove's credit as a political strategist that he so deftly managed the press. (Disclosure: I met Rove twice and had an extended conversation with him only once; we never e-mailed or spoke on the telephone. I was not among the chosen few, although I may well have fallen for his charms had I been.)

The Polarizer

An obvious and cliche point, but Democratic partisans viscerally hate the guy. Republicans are ambivalent. The people who've worked for Rove love him, literally, and are extraordinarily loyal.

The Agnostic

I could be wrong here, but I distinctly recall conversations with Rove friends who've told me that his struggles with faith did not lead him to Jesus Christ. Yet he knew and understood how to interact with (and manipulate, at times) the standard-bearers of the evangelical right and the Catholic conservative intellectual elite; he studied them like a sociologist; he knew their language, totems and insecurities, and in the White House, he used the powers of government to give them their voice and to fill their ego-needs.

The Power

As the Hotline notes, after John Weaver's resignation from John McCain's campaign, no current '08 candidate has a Rove-like guru. (In so many ways, Bill Clinton's role in Hillary Clinton's campaign is entirely distinctive.) Friends say that Democrats overstate Rove's influence over Bush and that Rove understates it.

Friendship

Bush and Rove were acquaintances, then buddies, then totally inseparable. 34 years of camaraderie and deep trust. In a conversation with a friend today, both Bush and Rove joked about their codependency. Moving on will be tough for both men.

Share This

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/15779

Comments (68)

Marc: please wipe the tears from your eyes as you toast this fascist piece of shit.

Rove is a criminal and should be prosecuted, just as should George, Dick & Rummy! These guys are the REAL terrorists and put a HUGH black mark on the face of America unlike ever before, they should all be ashamed of themselves and have nothing to be proud of - NOTHING! Matter of fact any person that remained on the Bush Administration after his first stolen election should be charged with treason & locked up!

I am ashamed to be a citizen of the USA!

Karl Rove, labeled a 'genius' because he had no problem creating one smear campaign after another. Got the worst President in US history elected not once, but twice. If it were up to Rove Cheney and Bush, the President would have absolute power forever. Fire US attorneys 10 times a year, why not it's 'legal.' Use gay marriage as a polarizing issue, gay people aren't really human, right Karl? One of the worst Human Beings who has ever lived. Right behind Cheney GW and Rumsfeld.

They both ruined America. MOFOs.

The disappointing part of this is that the press let itself be manipulated. We out here in the real world are totally dependent upon the press and electronic media; they are the front line people who are in the places where they can dig for truth. They didn't. And as I look at what's happening in the justice department, I'd argue that they still aren't. Damn suck ups, all of them.

rOVE SHOULD STAZND TRAIL, SAME AS BUSH AND CHANEY, FOR ALL THEY HAVE DONE TO IRAQ AND AMERICA...MAY GOD GIVE AMERICANS JUSTICE AND HAVE THEM ALL BEFORE THE COURTS FOR THEIR CRIMES....

Self righteous lefties! You lemmings will let your hatred push you into the abyss.

The "news media" creates images, good and bad. Too bad they can't just report the news. Too much garbage spewed out as news, either by personal bias or ownership's directive by party affiliation.

Let's hope Rove answers to the charges. If not criminally iable, he is morally condemned already.

I've never seen such a group of thieves and liars in one organization as that at the White House. Stealing elections; robbing the poor to give to the rich; running up a record deficeit; illegal and immoral wars; graft; criminal acts; and the list goes on.

Rove's mistake was that he directed Bush as if he were running for POTUS non-stop. He needed to leave immediately after the win in '04.

http://political-buzz.com/

Anyone who really thinks that Rove is leaving to spend more time with his family might want to think about buying this bridge I saw for sale in Minnesota.

It's unfortunate that the poster above possesses a tag like "goethean" but cannot manage any more nuance than "fascist piece of shit". Karl Rove is a genius -- an evil genius, but a genius nonetheless. What a pair! Bush, the straight-shooter who looks askance at the world and Rove, the devious manipulator who looks it straight in the face.

In spite of his excesses (and I'm in no doubt, they are many), he certainly stands as a crucial counterpoint to the unthinking, fundamentalist conservative. I always wondered why Rove did what he did: screwballed a pitch he didn't even believe in. But ultimately, he was a salesman. He took an unlikely, bumbling package and made him the leader of the free world. He proved himself bigger, better, beyond the product he was selling by selling it.

As much as I'm disgusted with Bush and his cohorts, I'm with Marc on this one. It's much too one-dimensional to reduce him to a "fascist" and simply juvenile to reduce ourselves to insults. In this case, I only hate the player because he was good at his game. And I'll leave it at that.

I'm simply grateful that Rove and company eventually out-dribbled themselves. But it's a testament to the bankruptcy of the Democrats and the media that it took a hurricane to give them back their teeth.


At first I thought the headline here was "No One Liked Karl Rove"

...according to the profile in this month's Atlantic ("What Karl Rove Couldnt Deliver") thats probably not far from the truth.

His flaws seem pretty simple = he was a political genius, but a policy nincompoop. Even his good ideas (social security reform and school vouchers) died on the vine because he was incompetent. He set the mold for the whole gang up there.

Turd has finally bloomed. Anybody knows where the dung beetles are?

To the person that said that he is ashammed of being an American citizen, I suggest that he should take an airplane, boat or whatever, and moved out of this country. We do not need a piece of this shit roaming around.

I must agree with Mr. Black. Since I have come to disbelieve anything this "administration" says about anything i must believe that this "resignation" is in name only. I rather believe that karl will continue to influence, subvert, and prevert george on a continuing basis, albiet unofficially.

No, jim, it's George Bush and Karl Rove who have dragged us into the abyss. Tshenko: how do you like "ratfucking political hit man," then?

Karl Rove belongs in an orange jumpsuit in a federal penitentiary, along with the other members of the Bush Crime Family.

Oh, the innuendo started by Fitzmas! And, now Rove is just leaving? On his own? Just like that?

Amazing. But true. It deals a blow to the Bonkeys, because they thought they had to pry Rove out in a "handcuffed frog march." All because he said "I heard that, too."

At least, ahead, Bush has approval numbers going UP. And, the GOP nominees will have to show him respect.

Bringing sides together. Bush will probably leave office, January 2009, as a UNITER, after all.

Rove a criminal? Perhaps. But then, Sandy Berger is just another Boy Scout, right?

Wake up, dummies. They are *all* criminals.

Nice to see that all of you folks have a such clear eyed vision and can write so deftly and concisely. Now tell me, just what is it you are progressing toward?


Rove and Bush ruined the Republican party, lost the House and Senate, got one measley little tax cut and were forced kicking and screaming into a couple of reasonable Supremes.

Geniuses? More like idiots whos works we will suffer for quite a while. And I say this as a conservative.

One of the continual criticisms of Rove was that he was a "divider."

Well, reading some of the profane and vitriolic comments here about Rove -- who, in the end, is just a political operative with a photographic memory about voting patters -- I WANT us to be divided.

Because I want no part of the loathers and the demonizers. I want them to be totally separate from me.

Most of you are seriously mentally ill. Where do you get this garbage. Rove is a political strategist. His job is to get people elected. He broke no laws and if you have proof, then deliver it. You can be sure if any laws were even on the edge of being broken by Rove, the Dems and the media would be all over it. Bush has not broken any laws and has done his best to give our enforcement agencies the tools to do there job. Again, if there were any laws broken the Dems and the media would be all over it. Could it be that both these men were simply doing the job they were elected/hired to do?

No, that would be too simple.

I've never understood the obsession people have with Rove. I've never heard him give a speech. I've only ever seen him on the White House Christmas Barney videos.

Rove has no power over anyone anywhere. If people are unhappy with anything done by the administration, they should blame the President. He's the boss. Rove is just an advisor.

His departure is meaningless. His entire impact was to give advice, and that advice was mostly not shared with anyone except the President and his staff. He can still do that, he's just not being paid the same way. Advice is taken or ignored. The advisor is meaningless. It's the decision that is of consequence, and the decider.

Mental health is definitely the issue. Also the leninist personalization of what should be political decisions. How can you so deeply hate someone that you only known from CNN news clips?

I'm a conservative, I don't hate you progressives. I just wish you would get your heads on straight.

Wow, what a amazing display of repugnant narcissism from the Left and Angry Liberals. Following Kamikazi's lead, put up or shut up.

If your President, George Bush, committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors' produce the goods.

If Karl Rove committed crimes, produce the goods.

And remember, policy disagreement is NOT a crime. Not that any of you can understand the difference in the state you're in.

Hey, the President is apparently an election-stealing chimpanzee/war criminal, but the people who say so aren't being "divisive." That label is for, well, Karl Rove.

Why does Rove generate such hatred on the Left?

Simple, his electoral strategy was to exploit Dem weakness, which is anti-populist, hatred/loathing of America, and hatred/loathing of the average guy. ESPECIALLY the average WHITE guy (who Dems hate).

The Dem Party made Rove into a genius (truth be told Rove is merely competent). Dem positions, electoral alliances, and politicos all cater to wealthy hard-left white elitists who hate the average white guy, those who aspire to high social status, and of course various grievance groups.

Look at John Kerry's sad echo of JFK's social aristo and high-status Cape Cod posing (on his windsurf board) and GWB, born with a silver spoon in his mouth as a real-life aristo, posing as a "dumb" Texas Cowboy.

What Dems hate is that Karl Rove exploited the populist gap, for a while, on national security, the military, patriotism, and so on. Dems are of a piece of John Cougar Mellencamp, who said a "real" response to 9/11 would be ... nothing. Because it's pacifist. I well recall the Moveon people parading in NYC days after 9/11 against any military action in Afghanistan ("Our Grief is not a Cry for War" read their signs).

Rove exploited this competently. Just as Lee Atwater exploited Dukakis putting pandering to Black groups by releasing murderers over public safety for Joe Average (i.e. parolee-Murderer Willie Horton).

With a Party led by safe-word Nancy Pelosi (Palomino! Palomino!) and Harry Reid and featuring Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards as Presidential candidates the next Karl Rove need not be a genius. Just moderately competent.

Dem's basic problem is that National Politics is not a dinner party at Laurie David's mansion in the Hamptons, social jockeying on the order of "I'm smarter, high status, and better than you" causes self-destruction.

Rove's biggest self-inflicted errors were Open Borders / Amnesty. Joe Average loses when his country becomes Mexico, Spanish not English becomes the dominant language, and he's replaced on the craft/trades like plumbing by cheap Mexican labor which also creates housing shortages, hospital/medical care crises, failing schools (where his white kids get beat up by the new majority).

His second biggest was not fully exploiting Dems contradictions: cater to the Kos-lunatics on National Security or stop terror attacks. Or the guys at Gitmo. Make Dems vote to give full civil rights and a criminal trial (where he's sure to get off) for 9/11 Architect KSM.

Dukakis lost because Joe Average understood that Mike would side with Black activist groups to release convicted murderers with no supervision over public safety (because he was a status driven ideologue). Just as the Rove Dem equivalent Carville beat G HW Bush as the elitist, out of touch aristo who didn't care about the economy and Joe Average.

Carville generates respect among Dems because they like his strategy: go populist, it wins. Rove generates hatred because his strategy is impossible for Aristo and Aristo-aspiring Dems.

mbawmba asks: "Turd has finally bloomed. Anybody knows where the dung beetles are?"

They're posting on Malkin's site and on FreeRepublic. They're watching O'Reilly with orange fingers from the Cheetos they eat. They're listening to Limbaugh as their hangovers subside. They're bitching about the people they encounter who don't speak English, or how "those gays" keep "shoving it down our throats." They're pretending Rudy and Romney hated abortions all along. They're claiming we're winning in Iraq. They're yapping about "family values" while working on their third divorce. They're making "Hitlery" and "Barack Osama" and "Edwards is a fag" jokes. They're buying Ann Coulter books and reading the first two chapters. They're rotting from the inside out.

That's where they are.

Worst president in history? Have you morons heard of Jimmy Carter? Only ex president making himself worse every day.

The frothing at the mouth left is apoplectic today, Karl can still push their buttons with his eyes closed and both hands tied behind his back. Dreams of Fitzmas still dance wildly in the dreams of these raging hordes of Kossers and DUers.


The frog march they think Karl deserves has been replaced, they fear, by the head coach pulling out his stars to applause in the last quarter as the winning team does not want to run up the score. The frustration is palpable, you can almost see the locks of hair still clenched in their shaking fists.


My heart really does go out to them, they have a whole election season ahead of them full of more dashed hopes and desires.

Luvwknd above professed shame at being a citizen of the USA.

After reading the above comments, I am ashamed. Not of America, but of Americans.

Is this the state that political discourse has sunk to in this country? Unsubstantiated allegations? Invective that isn't even clever?

Can we not disagree without being disagreeable?

It has become common practice to demonize anyone who doesn't totally agree with you, to question their motives, and to call them names.

We call them Nazis and suchlike, say they're evil.

Pardon me for pointing out the (apparently) not-too-obvious.

Politics is the art of persuasion.

And in the country, about 40% of the voting population is die-hard left and right. Which leaves about 20% who can be persuaded. And those 20% decide elections.

As an independent, supporters of one side or other stooping to name calling just gives me a negative impression of that side and candidate. And I'm not alone. Therefore such behavior is not good persuasion.

We too often get the "he's a poop-head", "she started it", "well he hit me first" type of political discussion. It's like a long road trip with a bunch of unruly children in the back. We can't even put in a DVD to distract them. We can only hope for some Anna Nicole/Brittany moments to distract so we adults can have some peace.

A positive example is Jim Rockford's comment. It is well reasoned and free of invective.

I may agree or disagree with him. But I feel certain we could have a vigorous, enlightening political debate and would still be civil by the end of it, no matter how much we disagreed.

Thanks, Jim

"rOVE SHOULD STAZND TRAIL, SAME AS BUSH AND CHANEY"

Which trail should he "staznd" on? (I've heard that the Appalachian Trail is nice this time of year.) And I'm not sure what a former Temple University basketball coach (Chaney) has to do with all this...

Sit back, take a deep breath (and disengage the caps-lock key). Your hate is rendering you rather incoherent here.

Karl Rove was not a genius. He is a Nazi who used Nazi tactics to steal elections.

Don't bother anyone with the many examples you've neatly stored away for just this occasion.

goethean wrote:

"please wipe the tears from your eyes as you toast this fascist piece of shit."

I suppose if the leftists misuse the word enough, they might redefine fascism such that when they act out their revenge/superiority fantasies, it will be called justice.

Yours, TDP, ml, msl, & pfpp

What a great and reflective time I've had reading these comments...practically to the word, I see and hear myself at 20, then late twenties, then mid-30s, and all the way up to today, nearing 50. Yeah, I was a SCREAMING liberal once, and then years of family realities and social experiences (as well as an awakened faith) slowly but surely moved me rightward. The fringe/R-rated posts above can be forgiven if the posters are still in their raging youths...

Methinks, however, that many of them are my age, or even older. They have failed to evolve; they are stuck, like an old vinyl LP with a scratch that keeps repeating the same bar and a half of music, over and over again. Their anger and hatred are borne of frustration, largely with themselves. They ARE ill, mentally, to some extent (as Kamikazi suggests), and I pray for them often.

It amuses me that all those deluded people who are just oozing vitriolic hatred and spluttering outrage at the mere mention of Karl Rove's name are eagerly looking forward to President Bush leaving office on January 20, 2009. It's that magical day when everything that is wrong in their miserable lives will be made right.

Funny thing, though: They'll find that all of the vinegar in their souls won't be washed away on the next Inauguration Day. They'll still be just as miserable, and will spend the rest of their lives bitching about the departed President, just as Archie Bunker was always bitching about FDR on "All In the Family." You know I'm right.

Ain't no vinegar in this liberal's soul, Clyde, but this thread shows vinegar in this country Allegedly high-minded comments about what being a grown-up means only reinforce this impression.

Will Rove land in Fred Thompson's camp?

http://political-buzz.com/

Clyde writes: "It amuses me that all those deluded people who are just oozing vitriolic hatred and spluttering outrage at the mere mention of Karl Rove's name are eagerly looking forward to President Bush leaving office on January 20, 2009. It's that magical day when everything that is wrong in their miserable lives will be made right.

Funny thing, though: They'll find that all of the vinegar in their souls won't be washed away on the next Inauguration Day. They'll still be just as miserable, and will spend the rest of their lives bitching about the departed President, just as Archie Bunker was always bitching about FDR on "All In the Family." You know I'm right."

What I know is that millions of ignorant wingnuts still blame Clinton for just about everything, and that January 20, 2009 will be the day our Great National Delousing begins.

I never thought there would be a president who would make Jimmy Carter look like a mastermind by comparison, but Dumbya Bush has done it. The day his rotten carcass leaves is going to be one huge relief. (And his flatulent dog Cheney, too.)

Kamikazee,

You obviously don't pay attention to the news. The media have been all over Rove and his involvment in the Valerie Plame affair, precisely because he skirted very close to breaking the law. If you don't believe me, then ask US attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.

As for your contention that Bush hasn't broken the law, you are dead wrong. Bush has freely admitted that his NSA surveillance programs have violated the FISA law, but took it upon himself to decide whether or not he had to obey and execute the FISA law. This is not a 'policy difference', like refusing to fund stem cell research. This is a violation of the precepts laid out in our Constitution. Congress makes laws, not the President; his job, as Chief Executive, is execute Congress's will expressed through legislation. He is not allowed to ignore laws on his own accord, even in times of war, and he is not allowed to commit acts of judicial review and interpret Congressional war authorizations as striking down laws passed by Congress; judicial review is an inherent power of the judicial branch, not the executive. Moreover, the president's inherent powers as Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces (and not of our citizenry) did not give him carte blanche to spy on American citizens, even for purposes of foreign intelligence gathering. If an American citizen is allegedly communicating with terrorists, the executive branch does need to get judicial approval for engaging in surveillance on that citizens

For all the hissy fits I seen thrown here with the "criminally negligient" and "go to jail", can anyone name a single crime that Rove commited, let alone one that can be proven? I'm guessing that most of this crowd thought it was okay when the previous chief executive committed a felony by lying under oath. This was okay, right? This was just an attack from the right...

eltoro,

I understand your argument, but isn't it a bit out of date? The Dems on their way out the door to their summer recess passed the Presidents' FISA bill.

"Congress makes laws, not the President; his job, as Chief Executive, is execute Congress's will expressed through legislation."

Side question- Why didn't Fitzgerald charge Armitage with the leaking of Plames' name?

Dualdiagnosis,

The current FISA bill is not retroactive; the president's breaking of the original FISA law still stands. So no, the argument is not out of date. Of course, if Congress lacks the will to rake the President over the coals for this, he will have gotten away with violating the law.

You ask why didn't Fitzgerald charge Armitage; I ask why didn't Fitzgerald charge Rove, Armitage, Cheney, and maybe even Bush. (All were involved in the leaking of Plame's name to various reporters; Armitage merely is the one who leaked it to Bob Novak specifically. Armitage wasn't the first official to reveal her name; his leak was simply the one that got published, as opposed to leaks given to Judith Milller and Matt Cooper) Apparently, Libby's perjury was so effective that Fitzgerald was unable to put a case together against any of those individuals

Indeed, a difference of opinion on policy is not a crime. While I'll admit it's open to some intepretation, the main crime Bush and friends could be said to have committed is the Iraq war.

The use of force absent a UN Security Council resolution expressly allowing it is a crime in international law.

As a non-American, I may have to remind some of you that international law does matter and can trump domestic law.

Such criminal charges are therefore possible, but I'd put the chances of it happening at about zero.

zamprelli,

You have a strange idea of international law. The United Nations is a debating society designed to keep nations from going to war. It has done a rather poor job at that.

The UN has no sovereignty over the US. The US Constitution, the American people and its elected representatives are sovereign, not some gang of foreign autocrats on the UN security council. We did not become slaves to the UN by signing a treaty to join it. You sound like a Social Democratic "one Worlder." You'll never get America to go along with that. We have no interest in joining you in the gulag.

International law has no jurisdiction here, either. UN Resolution 687 allows any of the coalition partners to end the cease-fire after the Gulf War if Saddam did not keep his side of the treaty. Hans Blix reported to the UN general assembly that Saddam did not up hold the treaty nor the other 16 UN Resolutions. The discovery of WMD stockpiles in 1995 and Saddam's expulsion of the UN inspectors in 1998 abrogated UN resolution 687, so the Gulf War was back on. That is why President Clinton made it an American goal to overturn Saddam's regime in 1998. The only problem was that there was no political will to do anything about Saddam until after Sept 11, 2001. All Bush was doing is carrying through with Clinton's goals. How is this illegal? What laws were broken? Most of the examples I've seen cited are treaties that the US Senate had never ratified. No ratification means no responsibility or legality.

eltoro,
Good luck having Congress go after the President for FISA violations, They have no moral standing to do this since they have approved of the techniques Bush has wanted.(but you knew that)


You say Libbys' perjury was so effective; like many you may have bought into the meme that Libby was prosecuted for massive amounts of lying and obfuscation. He was specifically convicted on a very small part of the investigation- whether he learned the info about Plame from Tim Russert or if it was the other way around. That's it!, that is the huge obstruction that was put up. As they say- "You can look it up!"


Fitzgerald did not prosecute anybody for the so called underlying crime because there was no underlying crime.

Karl Rove's minion, or boss, whatever Bush is, is about as unpopular as small pox. How can anyone think Rove has done a good job? When Bush's father did this-- turned a 90% approval rating into sub-30-- no one crowed about what a genius his handler was.

I guess Rove's genius is to make the press think he's a genius. "What! You gonna believe me or your lying eyes?"

Not to mention his "genius" has help mire this country in a condition that the vast majority of Americans categorize as "the wrong track". I know that Rove saw his job as getting people elected (why he got to be paid as a federal official by the taxpayers, I don't know). But he isn't even managing that. He wanted a "permanent Republican majority." If we end up with 20 years of Democratic majorities (a definite possibility), wil you guys THEN admit that maybe he wasn't even good at that part of his job?

He must be really good in bed. He sure seduced a bunch of reporters.

dcxhilq ryoeqvi qvfngliuj cfoahgz xogtrkbj vgjnu paynv

lacery-

ok, if after 20 years of Dem majorities THEN I'll admit he wasn't good at that part of his job.
Talk to you then-

My goodness the conservatives here are so full of anger and self-delusion. I hope you Bush supporters can stop and take a deep breath before you pass out.

Oh Harold S, I completely agree with the blog swarmers here. Rove and Bush haven’t been convicted of anything, yet. Why don’t you guys just stick to the dozens of already convicted moral values Republicans?

Robert Novak testified that Rove was the one who leaked Valerie Plame's name. She was in fact a covert CIA agent according to the CIA and the A.G.'s office. That is a crime. He illegally destroyed White House emails that were required to be archived by law. He was complicit in the firings of the A.G.'s. His protege, Tim Griffin, who replaced the fired A.G. in Arkansas was known to have (allegedly) participated in illegal voter caging according to Monica Goodling's testimony. That's the reason she needed immunity to testify. That fact was very underreported in the news, if at all. The only place I know of that televised that part of her testimony was C-Span. The Judiciary Committee is investigating his numerous violations of the Hatch Act. I think it's clear that he's leaving the White House so he can smear Hillary full time on the talk show circuit. He's disgusting.

Very good site. Thank you!!!

In our covert investigation conducted at Victory Christian Center (VCC) in Austin, TX, we collected mounting evidence of how the Republican political strategy is employed from the Bush/Rove White House on down to their base of conservative Evangelical churches.

David Barton, Vice-chairman of the Texas GOP and founder of an organization called Wallbuilders, was invited to be the guest speaker at both of VCC's Sunday morning worship services on August 20, 2006. According to Pastor Lee Boss' introduction of David Barton to the congregation, he's "been used by God to touch more elected officials in this nation over any other organization." Armed with old-time bibles, a swanky PowerPoint presentation, and much jibber-jabber, Barton mobilizes the Evangelical Christians to the polls by replacing the word "voting" with "stewardship". He concludes by telling us that Republican political candidates are the obvious choice in our stewardship if we are concerned with biblical issues.

Karl Rove understands the conservative Evangelical voices are a powerful and very well organized tax exempt, money making machine for the Republican party. As long as these Evangelical church leaders have an insatiable appetite for power and influence, Rove will continue to use them to succeed on his mission of establishing a permanent Republican majority. Watch how all the Republican Presidential candidates are scrambling in a tizzy to court the Evangelical / Religious Right vote. It's funny to see the conservatives salivating at the bit, waiting for the next self-righteous politician with the right outside package that they can rally behind. Ever notice how the GOP have to beat up on a minority group of people in order to rally their base? How Christian or Christ-like is that?

FaithoftheAbomination.com

efcquhis ircjdqgx eczvoqag ympjxrb qpjwmh krib zjhkvrsn

Nice site. Thank you.

jbcdfry wjquky dgvtiza wqmh

kxothcn tqgyki nbjfy ufpyqrn

nvtabf erlb

cnyv qfja srjdfv

Cool site. Thank you!

Cool site. Thank you!

Cool site. Thank you!

Post a comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although The Atlantic does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.


Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.