« Ron Brownstein Joins The Atlantic | Main | The National Journal Political Stock Exchange »

Major GOP Candidates Skip Values Voter Debate

18 Sep 2007 07:32 am

Last night, instead of Monday Night Football, I watched streaming video of the Family Research Council's Values Voter debate in Ft. Lauderdale, and was most impressed by who was not there: the candidates who have a real shot to win the Republican nomination. No Mitt Romney. No John McCain. No Rudy Giuliani. No Fred Thompson.

(Wouldn't you have loved to see Rudy Giuliani questioned by Phyllis Schlafly’s)?

It's a safe bet that Romney and Thompson will indeed show up at the FRC's Values Voter briefing, scheduled for October 19 through October 21 in Washington. This gathering of religious conservatives will either be an important milestone in the presidential race or a peg for the media to write stories about how an unorthodox Republican is likely to get the nomination and how angry James Dobson will be at this point in 2008.

Last year, George Allen used the event to restart his campaign after the Macaca incident; Mitt Romney delivered a widely praised-and-criticized speech about marriage; Rudy Giuliani was treated like a rock star but spoke for 40 minutes without pandering to the audience.

BTW: Straw poll alert: Members of FRC Action, its PAC, are voting online in a straw poll.

Comments (3)

That debate was a strange sideshow that the top tier needed to avoid. Imagine Cindy Sheehan and Howard Zinn grilling the Dems.

http://political-buzz.com/

I think it would have been interesting to see how Rudy would have wriggled out of the question by the chinese girl who survived an abortion...had he bothered to show up.

Hey Marc, FYI: the debate last night was neither sponsored nor affiliated by Family Research Council. You are correct, however, that the October 19-21 Washington Briefing 2007 Values Voter Summit event, and the online straw poll are sponsored by FRC Action.

I guess somewhere along the way somebody forgot to trademark the term "Values Voter," hence the confusion. Oh well...

Jared Bridges
Web Editor
Family Research Council