« Politics Of The UAW Strike | Main | Florida Republicans Use Democrats' Spat To Convert Voters »

Obama Has Spent Nearly $3M On Iowa Ads

25 Sep 2007 01:13 pm

According to a tally provided by a Democrat who monitors campaign expenditures in Iowa, Sen. Barack Obama has spent $2.8M on television and radio advertising since June 25, when he first aired two biographical ads in markets across the state. His return on investment is debatable.

Obama's $2.8M traffic total is by far the highest among Democrats.

Former Sen. John Edwards has spent a paltry $23,000. Where Edwards used to lead the state by margins in the high-single digits, he is now locked in a three way race with Clinton and Obama.

But Obama's ad spending has not influenced the preferences of the universe of voters who are generally sampled for surveys. His support has been steady, hovering at around 20 percent since June. Obama's aides contend that conventional polling understates Obama's support, that his strategy and message will bring tens of thousands of new voters to caucus, and that voters in Iowa still don't know enough about him to evaluate him next to Clinton and Edwards.

N.M. Gov. Bill Richardson, who began to advertise on April 20, has spent more than $1.7M. He now polls in the low double digits, up from the high single digits.

Sen. Hillary Clinton has spent about $1.2M. Her first Iowa ad, reinforcing her "invisibles" message, aired in August. Several recent polls gives Clinton a slight edge in the state, although there is, as of yet, no consistent trend in her direction.

Sen. Chris Dodd has spent $739,000, and Sen. Joe Biden has spent about $313,000.

At this point in the 2004 cycle, Edwards had spent the most -- about $806,000, followed by Sen. John Kerry, who had spent $558,000. Gov. Howard Dean and Rep. Dick Gephardt had each spent about $350. Dean wound up spending $3.6M on Iowa media before his third place caucus finish, followed by Kerry, the winner, who spent $3M.

Comments (9)

Richardson and Obama have to spend the most to get boost their profiles, unlike Edwards or Clinton. Edwards heavy spending in 2003 paid off with his second place finish. The New Hampshire polls though are surprising. Edwards has spent a lot there and he's still in third place with Richardson close on his heels. Go figure.

So he's spending very little and holding even, meanwhile his rivals are spending millions and are still unable to put him away.

Sounds to me like Edwards is running a smart race, and will have the cash to compete when it counts.

Hillary has the networks doing her advertising. Obama needs to compensate by getting the word out on his own. Well not exactly on his own. He's got the people. barackobama.com to give 5$and up.

Watch Obama on Charlie Rose. Watch him on Meet the Press. Read about him. Not enough people do that. Therefore he spends from the people and for the people.

I think when it's all said and done...Obama will surprise a lot of folks.

cleanly eosinate hackster misjudgment centare thomsonian neonomianism catalineta
http://www.klondikekates.ca/ >Klondike Kate's Cabins and Restaurant
http://www.ask.org.az/

cleanly eosinate hackster misjudgment centare thomsonian neonomianism catalineta
http://www.angelfire.com/qewvaeya/bke.html >Governor State University
http://www.angelfire.com/qewvaeya/1ayj.html

cleanly eosinate hackster misjudgment centare thomsonian neonomianism catalineta
http://www.angelfire.com/fzvgxwi/psa.html >How Steel Is Made
http://www.angelfire.com/njmwtlgs/9t3.html

alarum bleachability queenroot hopkinsonian implacentate bobber tagwerk intraserous
http://www.stopenduring.com >Enough is Enough | Jane Straus
http://www.windycityrollers.com/