« Fred Thompson Defends Rush Limbaugh | Main | Outrageous »

White House 2008: The Democrats

03 Oct 2007 05:22 pm

This is the scrutiny quarter as far as the primary is concerned, and no one will face harsher glares than Hillary Rodham Clinton.

(By the way, we're not going to rank Dennis Kucinich or Mike Gravel anymore.)

These rankings are ordered by likelihood of winning the Democratic Party primary and are based on a number of factors, including organization, money, buzz and polling. Click here for Republican rankings

1. Hillary Clinton -- Is this her false peak? Or maybe this is the real peak, and the rest of the campaign will be about protecting her lead -- playing "four corners" offense, if you will. Her presidential evasiveness may be a sign of overconfidence; it's inconceivable that she won't one day be pinned down on entitlement reform. Her laugh tick is getting noticed, but it's endearing in a way.

2. Barack Obama -- Two days after a sickly performance in an important debate, he was greeted by 24,000 people in New York City. His candidacy is being sustained by a fat bankroll and intense curiosity, but his advisers need to admit that a movement is not yet... moving. He jabbed at Clinton's 1993 health reform secrecy, but he inexplicably refused to make a point of it, refused to make a contrast cleanly, and doesn't seem to feel the need to raise his volume above "subtle."

3. John Edwards -- Whoever is delivering these Fortress Investment Group oppo dumps (see South Carolina a few weeks back and the Des Moines Register the day after the debate), is landing real stomach punches against Edwards and setting up future attack ads via TV or mail. We think his campaign may have overreacted to the prospect of a poor fundraising quarter by pulling the trigger on public financing the day after a breakthrough debate performance. Everyone interprets the move as a sign of weakness, not strength.

Continue reading our race rankings.

Comments (9)

It's difficult to hang on to a lead so early in the game.

I think Bill Richardson should drop out and run for Senate instead, now that Domenici has announced his retiremnet.

That is, unless he hasn't already been promised VP on someone's ticket.

"We think his campaign may have overreacted to the prospect of a poor fundraising quarter by pulling the trigger on public financing"

Meh. I imagine they chose to bury the public financing announcement to coincide with the Q3 fundraising news.

At the end of the day, the extra $10m is the difference between being able to wage a competitive TV campaign in NH, NV, and SC before IA votes and not being able to.

Short-term hit. Long-term gain.

Not to mention that it's yet another way to differentiate with Clinton.

"Whoever is delivering these Fortress Investment Group oppo dumps"

Whoever? I think one could safely bet the farm on that being Wolfson's shop. Wolfson is good. Too bad he's got a loser for a candidate. (You'll see what I mean in January...)

As a UNC Tarheel alumni who's team made the "four corners' famous....I resent the use and the defaming of it in reference in anyway to Hillary.

.

hey Lyn, are you the Tarheel from MYDD? You or your namesake hates Hillary over there too. What a coincidence.

(By the way, were not going to read your article anymore.)

THINK!!! What does candidate acceptance of large corporate donations tell you about the future of our democracy? Shouldn't the acceptance of large contributions be a negative factor in the presidential race? Make sence? Why not choose someone who can not be bought? KUCINICH 08

No more Kucinich and Gravel, huh? Just like that, paranthetical, with no explanation, with 13 months to go before the election? Well, why the phuk not?? Kucinich is doing very well in some straw polls, for one thing, and, well, um, I thought there were some Americans that wanted us OUT OF IRAQ, NOW???

Oh maybe not. 2013 isn't that far off, and whats another million dead Iraqs...i know, that's FREEDOM.

You are lame.

(By the way, I'm not going to read your articles any more either.)

(There's no real reason to read your articles any more.)