« A Response From FairTax.org | Main | Log Cabins Bash Romney On Taxes, In New Hampshire »

Clinton On His Records

29 Nov 2007 03:22 pm

A long, and not unpersuasive explanation from President Clinton about the Little Rock library and his records, from an interview Mr. Clinton gave to C-SPAN.

CLINTON: First of all, since this law that we’re operating under now has been in effect – that is, from President Reagan forward – I have worked to release more records more quickly than anybody else.

I want this stuff out there.

Some of it may be misused, and some people may want it for reasons that are not entirely academic, but that’s OK. I want the records out there.

I wanted to give all of my records to the 9/11 Commission. I wanted all the support necessary. And we kept meticulous records, and I wanted to give it to them.

The public has to know, they’re not my records. They belong to, and under the jurisdiction of the Archives. But I have the power to keep all of them closed for 12 years. I didn’t do that. We’ve released about a million pages already.

I want to push the release of more, including the request for documents about Hillary’s time in the White House. They’ll show how hard she worked on a wide variety of issues, and what she did in her travels around the world to advance America’s cause. So, I’d like it if the records got out there.

But there are certain rules the Archives has about reviewing them. Then they have to go to the – then we review them. And then the White House has requested the right to review some of them. Now, they’re being pretty good now, the White House is, about letting them out.

The Archives has some rules. They have a strict first-come, first-served policy. And they also, when they send us documents, they won’t release them until we review them all.

So, for example, the other day – as soon as this controversy arose, Bruce Lindsey, who has other things to do, had 26,000 pages of documents to review. He had already reviewed 20,000.

So, he said, “Let’s give the people 20,000 documents.”

And the Archives said, “No. We don’t release one page until you get all 26,000.”

I don’t know why that’s their policy.

But we have asked them – I have asked them already on two occasions if they would speed up a particular release, and they declined to do so. That’s OK. But the American public just needs to know, we’re getting this stuff out as soon as we can.

There was a request, I think, for all of Hillary’s schedules. And I think that’ll be out sometime in January.

But someone literally has to review all that. I don’t think people understand how time consuming it is.

For example, on her schedule, if there is an advance person – as there was, you know – let’s say she represents America in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan, in my first term, each one of those places where she stopped, there was an advance person.

If there was a private cell phone number there, the archivist has to go through and mark that out for privacy reasons, just on the off chance that they still have the same cell phone number.

If there were the names of Secret Service agents or a list in questionable places of how many agents were there, they mark that out so they won’t be giving deployment information.

Those are their rules, not mine. And I get why they do it.

But we’re not trying to hold up anything. I am pushing this faster than any of my predecessors since the new law has been enacted.

Comments (8)

How does this address the library records at all?

How does this address the library records at all?

The Clinton Library IS the national archive for all of the Clinton Administration records. Just like the Carter Library is the national archive for the Clinton records and the Reagan Library is the archive for the Reagan records.

BTW, this is not the first time Bill Clinton has explained the release procedure.

To put this in context: Hillary's daily schedule that is being released in January is ten thousand pages. The National Archive staff that has to review each of those ten thousand pages is only 5 or 10 people.

BTW, has anyone heard when Obama is going to release his Illinois state senate records? He's touting his experience as a state legislator, so we have the right to comb through his records looking for dirt, don't we?

This seems like a pretty reasonable explanation to me. A good example of why it's hard to answer questions like this succinctly during a debate.

So...there shouldn't be any problem releasing tax returns too, right? Or the donor list for the Clinton Presidential Library?

Oh, and all of Obama's official Illinois State Senate records are already available.

What about HRC's records as First Lady of Arkansas, also not yet released?

Rashomon, Wrong Obama's records are not available. What you call official records are votes etc but no schedules, meeting minutes, etc. They have said at various time that "none had been specifically asked for" then when the SunTimes disputed that they said "no records exist they may have been discarded".

Please stop the Obama lying.

Reasonable. But it has been seven years.

As for Obama's record, it is worth distinguishing between releasing documents that exist and releasing documents that don't. I certainly could not comply with that kind of request because I do not take meeting minutes and no law requires me to. Has the Sun Times figured out yet whether any state senator has kept and released records? Or whether they are even required to? Wouldn't that normally be the first step in a story like this? But I suspect the Sun Times and Ms Sweet are just running interference for Clintons. A record is defined by law and if Chicago defines record as voting record and has no requirement that he keep a record of his schedule, or even keep a schedule for that matter, Rashomon is right.

Clinton's record however was kept. The only difference between her records and Obama's is that his are already publicly available, and hers will be, one day, eventually....

Does it seem reasonable that someone smart enough to teach law would spend 8 years in the Illinois State Senate and not have appointment books for that time frame? Heck I keep old calendars for years just in case I need to go back and check a date.

I am just suspicious that Obama states he didn't keep and doesn't have ANY records for eight years of his life in public office. But hey, that's just me.

As an example, Lynn Martin was in the Illinois State Legislature from 1976-1980. She has records archived from that time.

http://web.library.uiuc.edu/ahx/uasfa/2620092.pdf

Surely there are records somewhere of Obama's official activity as a State Senator. If not, than isn't he essentially saying, yes I spent 8 years in the Illinois State Senate and talk about my legislative experience and success there, but no I don't have a single record from that time in office. Does this make any sense?


Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.