« Is This "Senior Adviser" Doing Wolf Blitzer Any Favors? | Main | Risk V. Reward: The Anti-Romney Phone Calls »

"Diamonds v. Pearls" Student Blasts CNN (Updated With CNN Response)

16 Nov 2007 11:21 am

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student who asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate wrote on her MySpace page this morning that CNN forced her to ask the frilly question instead of a pre-approved query about the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

"Every single question asked during the debate by the audience had to be approved by CNN," Luisa writes. "I was asked to submit questions including "lighthearted/fun" questions. I submitted more than five questions on issues important to me. I did a policy memo on Yucca Mountain a year ago and was the finalist for the Truman Scholarship. For sure, I thought I would get to ask the Yucca question that was APPROVED by CNN days in advance."

Now, Luisa is getting "swamped" with critical e-mails.

So what happened?

Writes Luisa:

"CNN ran out of time and used me to "close" the debate with the pearls/diamonds question. Seconds later this girl comes up to me and says, "you gave our school a bad reputation.' Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That's what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality. So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source. If you want me to explain to you how the media works, I am more than happy to do so. But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question."
Rivals to Clinton believe that the debate audience had a pro-Clinton tilt. UNLV was responsible for distributing most of the tickets.

In a separate post, Luisa provides the question she wanted to ask:

Yucca Mountain, NV is the proposed site for the country's nuclear waste repository. Despite scientific evidence that it is a vulnerable site, the federal government continues to push for the plan to move forward. The evidence relied on is unsound and the risks involved in transporting high-level radioactive waste across the country are high. What will you [Sen. Clinton] do to ensure that the best site/s is/are chosen for the storage of spent nuclear reactor fuel?

Sam Feist, the executive producer of the debate, said that the student was asked to choose another question because the candidates had already spent about ten minutes discussing Yucca Mountain.

"When her Yucca mountain question was asked, she was given the opportunity to ask another question, and my understanding is that the [diamond v. pearls] questions was her other question," Feist said. "She probably was disappointed, but we spent a lot of time with a bunch of different candidates on Yucca Mountain, and we were at the end of the debate."

Greg Sargent of TPM Election Central has a CNN spoxperson giving a slightly different story...

Comments (560)

Almost a Truman Scholar and she gets to ask a Diamond vs Pearl question? Too embarrassing to say the least. And yes, the audience was stacked with Clinton supporters. CNN lost another chunk of the 10 percent credibility they had left.

"UNLV was responsible for distribuing most of the tickets."

I'm under the impression that Harry Reid's state party was responsible for distribuing most of the tickets.

Are you sure about your facts here, Marc?

This incidence once again proves that how out of touch the MSM is. Yesterday's debate was very poorly handled by CNN. The questions and the audience was clearly pro-Hillary.

BTW, is CNN brain dead in bringing in James Carville (a Clinton supporter), David Gergen (guy worked for Clinton WH) and CNN's own Campbell (married to republican operative and Dept of Defence spokesman till last year, David Senor) for doing the post debate analysis?? They all praised Hillary. What else one should expect from these hacks? Its time for MSM to wake up.

This was the worst debate I've seen so far this year. They handled the pre-debate show poorly by handing things off to Lou Dobbs (who is clearly a xenophobe), they handled the debate itself horrendously (interrupting candidates every 5 seconds and modifying questions in an attempt to play "gotcha" and create sound bite clips for themselves later), and they handled the post-debate show poorly by ensuring that everyone but the Republican had ties to the Clinton White House. CNN is an equal to FOX News in their bias and inaccuracy.

In addition, it was clear that the questions weren't written by audience members, but were modified for them to read/memorize - that was clear from the first question on - and when Suzanne Malvaux modified the one woman's question to just "will you support a nominee that would overturn Roe" - why bother with the pretense of having audience questions at all? Why not just stick with the moderators the entire time if the goal is to control the questions and debate.

And the diamonds and pearls question? As a woman I was offended by it. I felt sorry for the student who had to ask it - clearly she's smarter than that (based on your post here), and what a frivolous way to wrap things up. I have more respect for the UFO question from the last debate than I do for this one - and that's saying something!

CNN failed big time. They looked like amateurs. The Democrats shouldn't attend another debate sponsored by them.

And all this after CNN itself ragged on Hillary when her staffer planted questions at a rally in Iowa. Silly, silly CNN.


...and what was to stop her from asking her original question when the mike was in front of her?

coward...

oh no, look, wolfies all PO'd at me!

...too many sheep in this nation...

So this is what Clinton feminism looks like. What a complete disgrace and mockery of democracy. After the unrelenting nightmare of the last 7 years, I will never vote for phony, desperate to win at any cost, manipulating Clinton who would rather laugh and equivocate than deal with the serious issues of our time with integrity and sincerity. Our nation deserves much, much better.

Thank you for shedding light on this ongoing fiasco.

And right after the debate to have the pro Hillary commentators, spitting out of both sides of their mouth oowey gooey Hillary won stuff. Ugghh. Unbelievable! If I were a first time voter I'd be so turned off by these Clinton politics. Well, Obama can celebrate with another great endorsement today! GO OBAMA!

Posted by Petey: "UNLV was responsible for distribuing most of the tickets." I'm under the impression that Harry Reid's state party was responsible for distribuing most of the tickets.
Are you sure about your facts here, Marc?

Well, maybe that explains everything. Reid's son is Clinton's Nevada campaign chair.

Maybe they were just trying to make up for the last debate on NBC where Russert, Williams, and Mathews did nothing but attack Clinton. I'm no big fan of HRC, but, "more", if you think the MSM is going easy on Clinton you're the one who needs to wake up.

She should have asked the Yucca question anyway and just gotten removed from the stage.

Another planted question designed to make Clinton look good.

CNN is the Clinton News Network.

Terrible.

The conclusion that it was a partisan crowd rests on the premise that the crowd as a whole booed Senator Obama and John Edwards when they either raised their differences with Senator Clinton ...

... or, in one case, when Senator Obama started to tackle Senator Clinton when she repeated a crass tax scare line that was, indeed, laughably absurd with respect to retirees ... how much payroll income does Senator Clinton think that retirees have in a year? Is she thinking of retired CEO's that sit on the same boards that she does? ...

... but clearly it was not the whole crowd, it was a partisan contingent in the crowd.

Its simply a matter of finding your partisans in the crowd before hand, and priming them to "defend" their candidate from "mudslinging". She certainly has more than enough organization in the state to do that ... there was absolutely no need to stack the house ... the Clinton campaign was simply the campaign who felt confident they could get their partisans to boo without being booted from the event.

I agree that the moderators were terrible. It is inappropriate to sell a portion of the debate as "audience questions" and then change the majority of the questions.

The most egregious example was the person who asked about qualifications for Supreme Court justices. That lady in the blue suit holding the mike just tacked on the abortion aspect. Wolf followed suit and rephrased the question as an abortion-rights litmus-test question, which is was not. I liked how Biden said he would answer the question the woman asked and when she indicated she would like both questions answered, answered them both. After that, though, the question was only phrased as an abortion question.

Wolf Blitzer=worst debate moderator ever.
Russert is second worst. I am not a Hillary fan, but int hat last debate, he was clearly letting his anti-Clinton colors show, which is not the role of a debate moderator.

Overall, though, Clinton performed well last night. Not enough to win me over or anything, but I was impressed with her.

Last night, I was most impressed with Biden. He's really common-sense on most issues, IMO.

Yeah, but who else is going to cover this story...CNN? I don't think so, it will die because all the networks do it.

Prince made the song Diamonds and Pearl popular. Is this what is sounds like when the doves cry? Seriously, Clinton INC are millimeters left of center. This nation is leaning further right day by day. It is sad. Please all Anti-Hillary supporters rally to one true democrat. Just be cause she is labeled a democrat does not mean she represents you.

Petey is half right. UNLV distributed about half the tickets. I sat in that section. There were republcians, dems, independents. People were largely respectful and serious.

The other half of the hall (the side on which Biden sat) were tickets distributed by the state Democratic party. That area too had supporters of all the candidates. There were significant contingents of Obama, Clinton and Edwards supporters.

I'm quite sure that it was the Clinton supporters sitting in the Democratic party distributed ticket area who were booing during the debate. The other candidates supporters were there; they simply behaved themselves appropriately.

On the student, you may have the wrong student Mr. Ambinder. Today's Las Vegas Sun has a brief item about her which uses a different name.

Want a real presidential debate?

Get RID of the moderators, and install chess clocks.

Rules:


1. Candidates each have 10 minutes of mike time, controlled by a clock BUT it is not contiguous mike time. Whenever they want to talk, they hit the button on their chess clock and their mike turns on.

2. If they want to talk over each other, let them! The smart ones will clock out and save their minutes.

3. Let them talk about what-ever they want. The stupid ones will look stupid, the smart ones will look smart.

4. At the end of the night, someone will be smart enough to have the last word.


http://rewinn.blogspot.com/2007/10/real-presidential-debate-with-chess.html

I work at UNLV and am involved in local Democratic politics. UNLV was responsible for distributing half of the tickets, and the local Democratic party was responsible for distributing the other half.

Hillary supporters did the booing. It was embarrassing.

I work at UNLV and am involved in local Democratic politics. UNLV was responsible for distributing half of the tickets, and the local Democratic party was responsible for distributing the other half.

Hillary supporters did the booing. I was at the debate and noticed Hillary supporters doing the booing. It was embarrassing.

Ahhh...the parellels between CNN and Hillary. CNN calls itself "the best political team on television" and Hillary claims the "strength and experience" to be president....both breathless forms of hyperbole. Both Hillary and CNN plant questions. Both CNN and Hillary view truth as a relative matter. And they are both major embarrasments.

Hello kiddies. Do you not think (know) that all the producers and the moderators of the debate are the ones who select and choose the topic and phrasing of questions.

Listen Maria, you don't get to ask a question, unless it meets the producers program goals. Just because you are smart, you don't to be on Jeopardy. This is produced, by professional TV producers, with all the bells, whistles, graphics and story arc that is present in all TV shows.

Even in the YouTube debates, it is NOT the first 20 questions sent to CNN that get selected. The questions selected are those that meet the producers' pre-determined 'story arc' of the debate. All of the debates are done this way. Is this a surprise to anyone? Hell-ooo???

Wow, on top of the outright conservative Republican bias of Wolf Blitzer and John Roberts on display this really takes the cake. Let's close with a stupid question so we can really be just like FOX NEWS.

Isn't it cute that an "Truman Scholarship finalist" thinks that The Economist and the New York Times are INDEPENDENT news sources?

It was not UNLV, it was the Democratic Party of Nevada who gave out the tickets and many were given to DLC-type friends of a party leader. Still, Nevada Democrats have polled over 50% pro-Hillary so except for the rudeness no surprise it was a pro-Hillary crowd.

This was a horrible showing by CNN. The worst part was to have Gergen, JC Watts - two Republicans crowning Hillary as the Debate winner.
And also James Carville who is a close friend of the Clintons. Having Hillary as the nominee is a Republican Dream. They are very afraid of Edwards and Obama.

And all this after CNN itself ragged on Hillary when her staffer planted questions at a rally in Iowa. Silly, silly CNN.

To paraphrase Michael Scott from last night;s episode of The Office:

You know you're gonna get lied to by politicians, but not by journalists.

Or at least, in a sane world you wouldn't.

Another planted question designed to make Clinton look good.

Huh? Wasn't it a little demeaning to ask that of the only female candidate? Doesn't that question serve to trivialize her as a politician? It also seems like a variation on the boxers or briefs question Bill got (back then these kinds of questions were asked on MTV, now they are in CNN debates). Not sure if that was their intent in selecting it, but if people made that connection it would again diminish her as a candidate by treating her candidacy as if Bill is running again, which we know the media loves to do. Maybe I'm reading too much into it though...

wait, so her 2nd question was about diamonds/pearls?
she was a truman finalist, and if she didn't get to ask the yucca question, she was gonna ask about diamonds and pearls?
i don't feel bad for this girl at all.

Not that I'm one to defend CNN (who did a horrible job with this debate), but really...did she HAVE to ask ANY question? In other words, couldn't she have refused? Saying you were forced to ask a question you didn't want to strikes me as a bit lame.

UNLV gave the tickets out in a lottery style to students, faculty, & staff. The information that they collected would not have pointed them towards who might be Clinton supporters. I and several of my colleagues won tickets. I am actually registered Republican and have no preferences on any of the candidates (Rep. or Dem.) at this time.

Being there in person, the town hall questions were definitely staged. Even if the the student tried to ask her original question, she would have been cut off because they were out of time. That, or the correspondent would have added something outlandish on the end of it anyway, like the abortion question.

The student should not have done what CNN wanted. You will always be slaves as long as you are willing to be slaves.

The MSM belongs to 7 Jews, why help the enemy of the human race?

She should have asked her question, then we all could have seen how Leslie and Suzanne treated these supposed real people questions. She would have done us all a great service, either she got her question addressed, or they cut her off just like Bill-O does.

Don't hate the girl, just very disappointed. When she asked the question I just sat there and thought, boy she really made somebody proud with that question. Bet Daddy's thrilled with all of his hard earned money going to her college education, eh.

I love the Chess Clock debate. The reporters and moderators all suck beyond belief, well, not really, I expect them to suck, and they don't disappoint. Glad the Candidates pushed back some, wish they'd do it more and harder. What, Leslie isn't going to cover the Democratic campaign? CNN going to pass on all of those campaign dollars for commercials, seeing as how the Dems have most of the money?

Sadly, a chess clock would be as unfamiliar to most of the Democrats as the game of chess itself.

Hillary supporters are rude people, what difference does it make who distributed the tickets. It didn't matter how many supporters of each candidate showed up, Hillary's group of supporters were the loudest and the most rude at inappropiate times during the evening. They should have been shown the door. Improper behavior should not have been tolerated in this type of forum.

Yes the gender card was played again, in asking that stupid question, and Hillary's answer was playing to the female audience. No Hillary, I do not like you any better, pandering is unbecoming for all candidates especially to women.

As for nuclear waste, and where it should go, Nevada, made the waste, so it should be kept in Nevada. Every state in this country has it's own
garbage problems. The people making the decisions as to where to send their garbage, seem to feel free in deciding to send their garbage to poor rural areas of the country, okay to poison the poor people, not the rich. Nevada is a man made state. If the state is not fit for people to live, close the state and declare it inhabitable, please don't send your waste to any other part of this country. By the way ms. Luisa, no one can make you say or do anything you don't want to, you
obliged CNN because you wanted to be on television.

MSNBC and Russert is pro Obama and pro Edwards, Fox news is pro Giuliani and the GOP.
I`m happy to hear CNN was pro Hillary.
This girl wants her 20 minutes of fame.

CNN has chosen HRC as their candidate and FOX has chosen Ghouliani as their candidate.

Gee, thanks for narrowing the choices. All that brain activity that would have went to critical thinking about the candidates can now be put to more creative means, like shopping or reading about the blonde bimbo of the week.

NEWSFLASH: CNN and FOX are reporting that Britney Spears and OJ Simpson have a "love" child. OMG!!!!!!!

Look, this girl, while she may be bright, was in a high-pressure and tough spot, with producers from a huge network telling her what to do on a moment's notice. I don't fault the young woman at all.

And to the above poster who wrote about Campbell Brown...Brown is married to former Viceroy of Iraq, Paul Bremer's spokesnoodle, Dan Senor. Senor is now an advisor to the Romney campaign.

The conflicts of interest with Carville and Brown arise not from their relationships to candidates, but from the fact that neither Carville nor Brown nor CNN disclose any of the relationships.

Great and interesting comments about the Debate from this site. We should be glad that the questions of Diamonds or Pearls wasn't asked to one of the male candidates. Sometimes it's hard for people to see a qualified strong woman who can do as other female Presidents around the world do and that is stand up for truth. Americans honor their Mothers and hold them to the highest esteem but would want an idiot, drunk, druggie who steals and lies for President of the United States. Our country is in the worse shape it's ever been in with the weak lying President who American picked twice. If Hillary is attacked because she's a woman but best qualifed what do you think will happen if Senator Obama is picked. Look for the racist to come out strong and maybe bring back the real history of America and use RACE as their tool. We have seen the GOP use God and it worked next will be Women/Race to get another corrupt GOP in office. The Supreme Court is lined up to do what they are told. The GOP doesn't have to worry about the only Black Justice anymore. Yes Justice Thomas is totally insane and see DEAD PEOPLE. The rest of the 5 paid Justices are just looking for more oil shares to do as their told.

Further, I have to wonder if perhaps John Roberts and CNN didn't perhaps steal the young lady's question on Yucca Mountain.

Does anyone else remember the "Mac or PC" question from Boston in late '03 during another CNN Dem debate? There's a history of silly Q's like this.

But most of the format was fine, so it's no big deal.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

CNN did a terrible job:


Dobbs mocks dems prior to debate.
12 minutes of nothing as we wait the first question.
Gotcha questions with little time allowed for policy explanations.
Allowing the audience to boo was poor form.
Allowing the audience to applaud was a mistake.
Malveaux ruins audience questions with gotcha gotcha.
Campbell Brown gifts HRC with gender junk.
Diamonds or Pearls???? very embarassing.
Then cap it off with HRC supporters: Carville and Gergan??

CNN sucked last night.

The booing of Obama and Edwards whenever they criticized Clinton was beyond offensive and disrespectful. Clinton would have won my respect if she had interrupted the booing and called for the audience to be respectful of all the candidates, because each of them is strong enough to stand up for themselves. But, of course, she didn't, because she was gaining from the boos. Her silence was sad and tacky.

Personally, I think the young woman should have gone ahead and asked the question she wanted to ask. Sadly, we've seen what happens to folks who ask politically incorrect questions to politicians: they get zapped with tasers. It's time for this new generation to simply break the rules and make some noise. There's not much left to lose.

Who moderated them Lincoln-Douglas debates?

We've got that moron Campbell Brown asking about the "boys club" comment that was covered and explained ad nauseam for about a week.
That is all she could some up with?

Hilary should have said, "Women are sometimes, because of their inane questions, forced to prove themselves beyond what a man would"

Don't ever forget, folks, that CNN is the Clinton News Network. Slick Hillary and her husband, Honest Bill, are darlings of the Party of the Ass as well as the mainsteam media. They share impressive JD (from Yale) and BS degrees, as well as AHKH - all horsemen knew her.

Said Luisa: "So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source." Yikes. Economist and NYT "independent"? Not part of "the media"?? Next time, Maria Luisa, please advise people to skip those rags and read the internet. Start with http://www.whatreallyhappened.com 15 minutes a day every day for a month.

If we're getting this much mess while Hillary is just campaigning to be president, then how much will we get if she's elected? People have to be really self destructive to even consider Ms. Clinton for an important job as this. If they are this self destructive then they should never ever complain about all the destructive things that go on in the world today because they contribute to them.

The Clinton News Network strikes again.

Lord, why don't the parties just produce their own damned debate, and post the video on YouTube?

Then the party could choose decent moderators interested in good discussion, not some moron like Blitzer or Matthews or Russert.

Maybe the Dems could get Jeremy Paxson in from the BBC to moderate.

If she'd asked the question anyway they'd have cut it out or covered it up. They always have/always will.

Personally feel a little sorry for Maria Luisa. Seems like as nice person, if the clip is any indication. Seems pleased to be asking her question, and HRC seems pleased to be getting a softball. Maria Luisa certainly didn't realize what she was in for. Lots of disgruntled people on the internet, leading miserable pointless lives.

She should have asked the Yucca question anyway and just gotten removed from the stage.

Don't tase me bro!

College students mature brains are still forming - recent evidence suggests human brains don't fully mature until mid-twenties. We can give her a pass about the second question perhaps, but not CNN.

Too bad they didn't have time for the Obama question -- "Watermelon or fried chicken?"

"Diamonds vs. pearls"! Do you think they would have pulled that on a male student?

C'mon, folks--if the student had begun asking the Yucca Mt. question, Blitzer would have cut her off. Nicely, I'm sure, but she would not have been allowed to continue. Something along the line of this has already been covered. So, thank you, candidates, UNLV, etc. and it's a wrap.

Having gone through many perfected versions of conversations, questions, after the fact, I feel so much for this young woman.

Let it drop. And at least she got this information into the blogosphere and now has a reply from CNN confirming her story--pretty damn cool, if you ask me!

Oh, and as many have thought up already, Blitzer damn well better ask this question of Rudy!

Now I'm glad I didn't watch this one. I'm a former Democrat who has decided to vote for Ron Paul. I can't see anyone else on either side who really has a sense of what's going on.

Just to clear up the ticket distribution confusion. UNLV was allotted 450 seats for students/faculty. These were distributed via a lottery(1,400 students entered). The venue it was held in seats around 3k.

Wow, people are blaming a 15 year old girl for doing what the producers asked her to do on live tv? I thought liberalism included sympathy and understanding. Some of you guys really suck and should be ashamed of yourselves.

BTW: this wasn't her "second question", all questioners were asked to include a "fun question". This was her fun question and CNN chose it.

Did anyone notice that Clinton managed to avoid taking a position on the pearls vs. diamond question? Her answer was "I like both".

The comments about the audience for the debate being stacked in favor of Clinton are simply not true. UNLV was given half the seats, which were distributed via a lottery system open to faculty, staff, and students. The only information collected at the time people registered for the lottery was name, DOB, and email address; people didn't even have to specify political affiliation, so the pool was open to anyone: Democrats, Independents and interested Republicans. So, please, folks get your facts straight!

I attended the debate. I applauded answers I liked, rolled my eyes at moments of canned evasion, and, yes, even booed Edwards when he lumped Clinton in with the neocons, which I thought was a petty, low blow. Why are people so outraged that the audience reacted to the candidates' responses through applause or--gasp--even boos? You all need to get a thicker skin and revist the idea of what a participatory democracry is all about!

The final question of the evening was indeed lame and embarrasing, and I was infuriated that "pearls or diamonds" was the note on which the debate ended, once again pointing to how impossible it is for Clinton to escape the "gender issue." Campbell Brown, for her role in making Clinton's gender as much of a focus as she did, would be well advised to take a gender studies course.

In the end, I place the blame on CNN. Overall, they did a terrible job running the debate, from start to finish. Wolf Blitzer was an inffective moderator, and Campbell Brown's questions were anything but hard-hitting and substantive.

Do we have to suffer through five more CNN debates?

CNN didn't even mount a poll after the debate. They declared winners. Keith Olbermann gave the debate he handled far more gravitas.

Blitzer and Brown sounded like Clinton campaign PR flacks.

Get a load of the YouTube David Sirota cooked up overnight to diss Hillary's NAFTA response. Skim the US portion of the Economic Report he cites. A lot of the comments are interesting and informative as well.
Click on the "Politics West" link in this post, not on the video itself.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/11/16/david-sirota-on-hillarys-response-to-nafta-at-the-democratic-debate/

It was like the Disnified WWF presentation of presidential hopefuls.

This election sucks. Too shiny, too managed, too "American Idol" for me.

I Forgot "too much like a reality show." Who wants to marry a President?

Only another president of course

I emailed Wolfie this morning & told him it was the worst debate ever, if you want to call it a debate. Campbell Brown's husband was in Iraq with Bremer. They're the ones that really screwed up Iraq by dissolving the Iraqi army.

I used to like Carville & Begala, but can't stand them anymore. Same for David Gergen.

Senator Obama was terrific. Hillary looked like they plastered the makeup on her a couple inches too thick.

I feel sorry for the student, having worked hard to have a decent question and ending up with a question that should never ever been asked, ever!

I feel even more sorry for the American electorate after last night's debacle. It stands out as the worst "debate" to date
--the moderator lost control of the situation from the first question,
--the questions were mostly pap,
--the constant reassurances that "we have plenty of time" only highlighted the ultimate total lack of even-handedness in time distribution even among the top candidates (Obama: 18 minutes, Clinton: 16; Richardson: 14; Edwards: 10)
--the scripted questions and interference from the "journalists" (see in particular Campbell Brown's interjection of abortion into the valid question about what quality a candidate would seek in Supreme Court justices)

The media is making an absolutely mockery out of the political process in this country, turning it into the worst of infotainment. The desire by CNN to script the questions was blatant even before this student wrote the first word on her MySpace page.

I don't know what the answer is to the total disregard for open and honest debate of serious issues by CNN and other media outlets. But if I were anyone other than a committed political junkie and last night was the first time I'd tuned into this election, I would have turned off the TV and decided to check back in around Wednesday, November 5, 2008 for the results.

The one thing I did notice. The whole crowd cheered loudly when Dennis said IMPEACHMENT NOW!!!!

All of the above is MOOT> Who in the HELL would EVEN consider this criminal for the Presidency?? Are you people totally brainwashed?

I thought it was ironic that Campbell Brown asked Hillary the "gender card" question when she had to know that the "Diamonds or Pearls" question was coming up. The media has a double standard. Hillary is not supposed to play the "gender" card, but the media is allowed to give her stupid, girly questions. How was she supposed to answer that stupidity?

Teresa, you hit the nail right on the head re: the media's double standard about how Clinton's gender is or is not supposed to factor in all of this. She is caught between a rock and a hard place, and clearly, that's exactly where the media are going to keep her. I wish everyone would wake up and realize that ALL the candidates possess a gender; it's just that masculinity is so thoroughly connected to mainstream politics that most people cannot even see the way in which it operates. I am disgusted.

With the current candidates on both sides, we are in major trouble in this country. If this bunch of clowns is the best that we can do, we are in need of a national enema! Ron Paul at least knows of the plans to destroy our sovereignty by the globalist cabal, and addresses the issue as the rest of American either has an Ipod in their face, or are resting comfortably, thinking that everything is just fine. Ron Paul is not perfect either, but we sure have some sorry choices to attempt to get us out of a mess unlike any other this country has ever faced since it's inception.

If Hillary Clinton is the democratic "front-runner", we are in major trouble indeed. No
executive experience whatsoever, no real positions that she will take except to cater to every special interest group and the corporate globalist's needs.
She is obviously the network's choice for the oval
office, and that is a scary thought as well.

If these are the best candidates we as a people can produce, we are failing miserably.

With the last three administrations, in office who
all have done so much damage to our nation, we need REAL leadership to address the crucial issues
of our time. Clowns just won't get the job done folks! I know plumbers and truck drivers that can
out think this batch of political nightmares!
It is no longer acceptable to vote for the lesser
of two evils, or vote for someone that is
"electable" (the news media's new tactic to get
you to fall in line with the two corrupt parties).

Both parties have failed their constituents miserably! Our nation has been destroyed by the two parties in one fashion or another. We should by all respects have a dozen parties and not just
two corrupt one's to choose from. It is a sorry
state of affairs, when all you have is corrupt A
or corrupt B to choose from. Tisk tisk tisk.

Don't let the media choose your candidate for you!
Do not fall into the "you are just wasting your
vote" fallacy! Vote YOUR way, for YOUR reasons!

With these candidates, we are surely doomed!

If these are our sharpest tools in the shed, we
need to go tool shopping folks!

She was probably stunned by Hillary licking her lips and starring deeply into her eye's (probably wondering how sweet she would taste), so she didn't have the will to ask her own question. Just what America needs, more pre-planned criminals running the Whitehouse. Didn't Billy-bum-jammers wife feel any shame the first time her husband got nailed? After all, the guy was impeached, wasn't he?

Guess being a jerk-off is a good thing in America.

I attended, in the UNLV section--what previous UNLV posters have said is right on--I'll merely add that, while the booing seemed to me to come from the other side of the hall, and was by no means pervasive, it was noticable that almost nobody applauded those attacks. people applauded most loudly at lines that went after Bush....it seems to me that unless Obama and Edwards can find a way to attack Hillary that dosen't allow them to be made to look angry/unfair, they are doomed--& this won't be easy.

oh, and Blitzer is an absolute buffoon: since when do you read "forcing a bunch of people to answer reductive context-free yes/no questions" when you look up "debate" in the dictionary?

I am disappointed that CNN which was once a respectable news agency has allowed itself to fall into the pits with Rupert Murdock.

I am also insulted that Hillary's clan would insult women voters with the Diamonds and pearls. They did the unthinkable with asking the 'airhead' question as if women couldn't possibly care about or understand politics. Hey, she even insulted herself with that one. And, BTW, Hillary, don't whine and claim you didn't have anything to do with it. Of course, you didn't directly, but you knew basically what was going on or your campaign is out of control. How can you expect us to believe you can run the country if you can't run your own campaign.

One other thing that has been ticking me off lately. Everytime I listen to Hillary her years of 'experience' grows. Well, this is all news to me because I didn't know that the 'wife of' status was something you could count under experience. So, then are you saying that if my husband is the CEO of a major company I can then start applying for CEO jobs because of the experience I gained as 'marital experience'? That is dumber than dumb! She was only the 'wife of' the governor of Arkansas and the 'wife of' the President of the United States. Now if she wants to haul out her 'experience' with the Health Care Proposals in 1997, I'll have to remind her she failed miserably and if she had succeeded, we would have health care today.

Also, I remember when Hillary and Bill arrived in Washington and she wore the rag around her hair looking like the country bumpkin or something. She promptly insulted all country music fans by insulting the Queen of Country Tammy Wynette. She was defending Bill and saying he didn't 'fool around' and she got a bit boisterous and said 'I ain't no little Tammy Wynette standing by my man.' which proved to be wrong too. She even knew already that he was so she was simply lying then.

When will people realize that politics, the MSM, Congress, etc., is all phony and not here for we the people, but for the corporate interests of the elites and globalists. The bankers issue and control OUR money, which is against what the Constitution states! ONLY Congress has the right, yet the criminal system we live in continues to allow this horrific act to continue. Unless Ron Paul or Mike Gravel is "elected", America will become part of the North American Union, thus obliterating not only her history, but the rest of our rights, freedoms, and privledges! The world truly is a matrix of sorts.

CNN (Clinton News Network)

I think that her question was an embarrassment to the university. To think that an educated person, would sit down and allow for someone to censor her, it is outrageous. When that mic is on, you can say anything you want. She will never live this down, and will never again, have the chance to ask a question to world leaders in this format again.

Did they tase her, bro?

When I heard the "Pearl and diamond" question I immediately thought it was planted in order to lighten things up. Surely that question would make it appear that questions are not planted or screened, yet we see it was!

I watched the Spin Room after the debate, it was clear and obvious the whole debate was focused on Obama and Hillary. Edwards is a smuck. Dodd was pretty solid but the libs are putting the most "votable" in front.

Would they have tazered her had she ask another question?

They don't call it the Clinton News Network (CNN) for nothing.

Why did any of you assume CNN or FOX was unbiased?

Of course this was scripted. Look at the time left. Not a question asked with any permissible time for redress by any other candidate. Does any serious viewer really question the posing and answer of her last question???> (If not, please lie down and do not vote - except what crayon best fits the #2 spot on that drawing)

Especially given many news' sources claiming that "Wolf Blitzer" (nice name - how much did it cost?) was going to come on hard, only to woos out.

H. Clinton is as bad as G. Bush. Learn and move on. Or . . . . get the same.

Well of course the questions are planted. Wouldn't want the big bad peasants to hurt itty bitty Hilliary's feelings, now would we?

Seriously, 25 years of the two family rule (Bush/Clinton) is enough. I don't care who you vote for, but enough of the monarchy.

Come on those of you who are giving her a hard time. Have you not read the book about what they did to Kathleen Willy? Or to Vince Foster?

The Clintons are part of the new mafia cross them and die.

The Clintons excel in debates or interviews where they control every aspect of the event. Pre-approved questions with focus grouped answers always play well with their easily-impressed base. This makes Hillary nothing more than a marginally talented actress with full scale MSM support.

It's like saying Britney Spears is the world's greatest singer because she's so well marketed that her albums always sell.

If you're voting for Hillary, you're the world's biggest VOM. You are also tone deaf.

the Yucca Mountain question was equally stupid

who cares about nuclear waste, just ship it to Zimbabwe

If this young lady believes the New York Times isn't just as biased and untrustworthy as CNN, she needs to get a new perspective.

So glad I read this. During the debate I said out loud to my husband, "There is no way, our girls are going to UNLV". CNN rigged this one big time. And the Clinton camp set it up with the fake warning on Drudge as if they and CNN are totally independent of each other. We're still with you Barack!

This incident doesn't surprise me. CNN was the same network that selectively edited comments from pro wrestler John Cena to falsely imply an acknowledgment of steroid use. It's shameful how a former bastion of legitimate journalism has stooped to such tactics.

No follow up on Hillary's driver license for illegals flip-flop from last debate? Very weak, Wolf.

As for the student, how about a better spare question, with a little teeth to it?

Hillary will lose, anyway.

"College students mature brains are still forming - recent evidence suggests human brains don't fully mature until mid-twenties. We can give her a pass about the second question perhaps, but not CNN."


Glad she wasn't with us at Berkley in the 60s.

What stopped this girl to ask the question she really wanted once she was "live" on the mike??

-------PRESS RELEASE--------
November 16, 2007 - Atlanta, Georgia. In light of the current election season and to offer our support to our political partners, CNN is proud to once again temporarily change its name to, "Clinton News Network." We will assume the original name of "Communist News Network" once the election is over.
-- CNN PR Director

So...let me make sure I have this right...You submitted the question. And CNN asked you to ask it. What's the problem? I live in Texas and don't give a damn about the Yucca Mountain whatever or diamonds or pearls. It's wholly trivial and just another thing for people to bitch about. We're all so caught up in the partisan bullshit that it distracts us from addressing any real problems in this country! That's what the media, their corporate string-pullers and politicians want...to keep us distracted. They feed us the bait and we run with it. Wake up, people!

Wake up, don't complain (can't now use the word bitch), you got what you should have expected in a democrat controlled state, city and university. The MSM has annointed a person as their candidate and with an investment in such goes a push in that direction.
Voters in NV should be smart enough to read what they saw and vote accordingly. Not be told my the media what to think...unless you are brain dead or willing to be lead around like sheep. Get a backbone when you watch debates.

The impression I get is that the student submitted that question as one of her "fun" questions, and not that CNN told her to say it. Am I wrong?

Dumbfounded is as dumbfounded does. Wishing I knew the questions before the tests. So sad we have deteriorated to being force fed a devious, arrogant, sanctimonious maggot in a dung heap.

The girly questions were asked trying to make Hillary look like popular Oprah. Maybe Hillary should start a book club.

Get a life people - start talking to people face-to-face. Make your vote your protest!

Her husband during the "debates" was asked, "boxer or briefs." I can see something similar being asked of Hilary--"Tampons or pads?"

It is so easy to Hate Mrs Bill Clinton, let us count the reasons why. Flip to page two, after the first one hundred reasons why. HRC the Hindeberg of the Democrat party.

Just goes to show you - the media let's us hear what they want us to hear.

I can see the future - people will email issues of concern to the candidates, who will then post a searchable database of video clips explaining their positions on the issues. This would be great. The candidates would know what's on our minds, and we could get the almost-uncensored answer from the candidate.

Jeez, is the future here yet? I can't wait for it if it's not.

Gee, to Petey, Harry Reid or Clinton - What is the difference. He is in her camp so it makes no sense to even question who gave the tickets out - Clinton.

Also it was forcasted that Hillary would have a "Breeze" on this debate by anyone with a Brain after her disaster of the previous debate.

What a bunch of losers, IN BOTH PARTIES!.

Ms. Asbestos Pants or Mr. PLASTIC

Makes me just want to cry about what is in store for the next year till th eelection and then the 4 years after.

Phyllis Schafly, as a young woman, would have asked the questions she wanted to ask. Conservative women have courage and class.

My husband and I watched the debate; it was for the first time for us this pre-election period. We felt that the questions were unfairly distributed amongst the candidates. It was obvious who the favorites were. As a woman, I was totally offended by the "pearls or diamonds" question, just as I was offended that the male candidates were described as "boys". How shallow do they think the American people are? Was that the best CNN had to offer? If so, we won't watch another.

You people better shape up. It's HRC's turn and anyone who gets in her way, well read some history.

No betrayals and no tolrerance of treason. We'll remember who are freinds are and punish our enemies. No more Mrs. Nice Girl.

Remember what happened to the woman who lied about her husband, remember the unfortunate accidents in Arkansas and remember this time she'll have the CIA, FBI and the Special Operations people.

The only income and healthcare will be from her.

Suck it up and vote for Hillary if you know what's good for you.

OMG she says an independent media outlet like the New York Times???? Is she nuts? CNN, FOX, the WSJ are all owned by Jews. They therefore bias the republican debates in favor of all of the Jew-backed candidates like Jewliani, Mccain, Thompson, and Romney and the Democrats in favor of Hillary and Obama, both card-carrying communists.

What do you mean MADE you ask the question? If you felt it was beneath your dignity you could have not asked it. Wheres your integrity Truman Scholarship finalist?

Clinton News Network
Communist News Network
Censorship News Network
Take your pick....

Thats why I listen to Fox News and Talk Radio

CNN is for the intellectual brain dead hippie pinko commies that think that it takes the government to fix problems. Some people never learn that if you want to be truly free get the Federal Government out of running our lives. Free Health care will not only bankrupt the country, but you will now die waiting in line for an operation. Look no furthur than the Post Office, Tax offices and Drivers License offices. Wake up people! The friggin government just gets in a free economys way.

What do you expect? After all it is the "Clinton
news Network"

Question to HRC: Diamonds vs pearls.

No other news media mentioned the planted question, I found the news posted on the Drudge Report.

At least none of yall's candidates got booed like Dr. Paul in the Fox debates.

I support Dr. Paul, but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in hearing and understanding the viewpoints of others.

Maybe we can find common ground in our commiseration. :-D

This is what we have come to: the MSM determines what the plebeians will have on the menu for "news," the plebeians are hand-picked to ask questions of the election candidates about those manufactured issues, those questions are further filtered by someone behind the scenes, the question is then asked by the plebeian, whose question is then reinterpreted (and spun accordingly) by Wolf Blitzer, and then the candidates spout off non-committal, meaningless answers.

Diamonds or pearls? Republicans or Democrats? Who cares? This country is run by an unholy alliance of plutocrats who pretend to be on opposing teams, when they are only in the game for each other, fighting over marginal scraps while they tax the hell out of us into infinity. Meanwhile, the kingmaker MSM mafia takes its share, becoming referee while we watch it all unfold, powerless.

Our democracy is a laughing stock, our populace and elected officials are largely uneducated about basic economics and world history, the dollar is falling into the toilet to bail out house flipping, over-leveraged gamblers, and everyone is fat. I've had enough of this. I'd rather move to a different country than wait to drown on the Sinking Ship USA.

To the person who thinks that the media is tough on Hillary, how can you think that? If they were tough they'd ask

Would you support amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens if you became President?

or how about this one

Would you support gay marriage?

Would you support gays serving openly in the military?

What would you do to protect America against the terrorist threat? there were 5 attacks planned on your husbands watch and 4 actually took place, so would you go back to the status quo ie burying your head in the sand in reference to terrorism?

Those are the questions these fools should be asked but the tough questions only go to the republicans.

It would have been more appropriate if Hillary had been asked if she wears "boxers or briefs".

But she probably would have answered, "Both".

How is the New York Times or The Economist any more independent than CNN?

What the heck- who really cares about this issue- I cant stand Lou Dobbs- if his head swells anymore we will have an explosion like we never seen before- he reminds me of the kid that always got picked on- he is such a jerk

If I had the ticket I would have asked my question.Whether they liked it or not!!This is the biggest problem in AMERICA .Voters and CITIZENS being excluded from the process.

That debate was terrible. No candidates gave fact filled answers - it was all more of the same, and the crap about Wolf running a great debate with praise from the Clinton camp? Any time any one camp praises how a debate was run it means it was not run properly.

I want to see straight answers and the candidates mix it up. no more of this 'talk around the issue' and obfuscate crap.

Every candidate sucked last night and CNN failed miserably with the pre, post and during handling. And now we hear the questions were planted?

What a joke.

Lou Dobbs is such a xenophobe that he married a Mexican-American immigrant. I guess that's news to Lou and his wife. I see the hateful brownshirts at La Raza (The Race) have successfully brainwashed the guilty white liberals into supporting their racist, anti-Semetic, anti-white, anti-Asian, anti-black push for reconquista of the American Southwest.

Democrat, Republican. I don't see any difference. Hillary Clintons plan for America is the same plan as Dubyas dressed up in different package. As is Giuliani's, as is Edwards, as is Obama's. They are all cut from the same political cloth, more war, more doublespeak, more $2000 plate insider fundraisers and lobbying special interest groups. More of the same destruction of the American dream.
The emperor wears no clothes folks-wake up.

The media are "the deciders". They control the horizontal and vertical. Anyone who bucks their pre-planned narrative will be squashed like a bug.

CNN is a joke!! What a farce last night was. Wolf Blitzer caved just like all the rest of the weasels at CNN.They don't even try to hide their left wing preference. If (God forbid) hillary gets the job CNN will be officially named "network of propaganda". They make me want to hurl!

Sorry to break it to ya Maria, but the New York Times is the furthest thing from an "independent source".

Why anyone continues to be surprised by this woman is beyond me. Her lust for power could spell financial doom for us all if she is elected

Hey Libs: 48 hours ago Hillary was an advocate for 20 million people. In that time period, she turned her back on them. Now that is leadership!

Gays have experienced the same 'suport' followed by the same old 'civil union' crap.

Hillary is part of a very, very bad history. I invite you to consider the theme of an essay I wrote--one that addresses dynamics never linked by anyone in the press. Get past the 'sounds kooky' notion and consider what my 30 years of police experience led me to. In a nutshell:

1. Bill Clinton is sexual with an intern in the Oval Office.
2. He bombs The Sudan and Afghanistan 2 days before her Grand Jury testimony.
3. He bombs Iraq 2 days before his impeachment vote.
4. Liberals ALWAYS remind us that it is our fault--that terrorists are motivated by our policies and our actions.

5***Question #1: What did Bill's bombing accomplish in terms of their response?' 9-11 was the response not just to Clinton's bombing, but to his decison to fool around with Monica, and his subsequent bombing to get her off of the 24/7 news cycle. The Monica Lewinsky affair, in my opinion, may have led to 9-11.

***Major point: The media has asked itself why Sandy Berger would have comitted such a patently outrageous crime as to steal and destro classified documents just prior to his 9-11 Commision testimony. I would offer this:

Most everything about 9-11 and Clinton's administration was already in the public domain. There was no smoking gun of incomeptence, and even the CIA firewall issues were well publicized. So what would Berger be willing to steal to keep from public awareness? My theory: There is no way that we didn't have pre-9-11 intel reports that specifically linked threats made with 'wag the dog' or Monica references. Many extremists and mainstream Islamist leaders were speaking out about Clinton's motives in bombing them, i.e. Monica Lewinsky. It is almost vertain that some pre 9-11 attack threats specifically referenced Monica or 'wag the dog.' Clinton would in no way want that in the record at the 9-11 Hearings.

You can read my entire essay under my 'essays for boring days' section of my conserrvative music CD web site @

www.conservativemusiconline.com

The NY Times is no more independent than CNN or Fox. Owner Pinko Sulzberg is a raving MoveOn lunatic. The Economist is probably more independent than the Clinton News Network, Faux News or the NY Slimes.

What a joke. I would never vote for anyone that was afraid of Fox news. If they are afraid of Bill O'rielly how are they going to take on Iran and Korean dictators. Hillary has already shown how tough she is when she let the Horney Hillbilly walk all over her and she sucked it up.

I love that Harvard study that showed CNN was more biased than Foxnews. This "debate" was another clear cut example. The biased liberal liars that make up the new MSM are not only a naive bunch of elitist hypocrites, but these pseudointellectual "victim" peddlers are now becoming more brazen about it. That's OK, the higher you think you are, the harder it'll feel when you fall. Worthless "journalist" idiots.

...further proof that the political process is just a wag the dog type of scenario. the people, those pesky voters, really don't matter anymore.

You Yanks are going to get the President you deserve. Anyone with half a brain can see what the Clinton News Network was up to.

Although I agree it was a pretty silly question to ask a candidate, I really don't think it made the school look bad. It's not like it's the first stupid question to ever be asked. Press conferences are flooded with them.

The University has plenty of legitimate things to be embarrassed about. This certainly isn't one of them.

I didn't have to have a ticket to get in. All you needed was your Student ID. You can tilt the rep/dem scale at the debate but you can't tilt the 4 million people who watched.

When Bill was in the White house, we all used to call CNN, Clinton Network News. Now it has been proven true.

Before one of the debates between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, the word was out that Bush was going to go on the offensive. The CNN moderator had talked to the audience ahead of time and knew what kinds of concerns particular people had. As soon as Bush went on the offensive, she went to an audience member and asked him what he thought of campaigns tactics that were aggressive or attacking. The audience member said he didn't like that kind of campaign. Bush, of course, then stopped his attack, as the moderator surely hoped he would. It wasn't just Bush's looking at his watch that doomed his campaign. It was the tactics of the CNN host.

I wish that Hillary had married O.J.

College Students are the LAST people I want to get questions from. They have yet to enter the workplace. Have yet to raise a family and are clueless on most political issues other than the left wing pablum fed to them by their Bolshevik Profs .Most still living off their parents too.

What a joke. Does CNN still wonder why their viewership is dropping? Whoever is responsible for having Blitzer on the payroll should lose their job. Probably the same person that came up with that last question.

And the NYT is better than Clinton News Network? ROTFLOL . . . .

The media wants to control the message, because they want to control your voting...

Reject liberal media propaganda!

How does CNN 'make' you ask anything u dont want to, were u just to scared to say NO? or couldnt you say sure CNN i'll ask this and then when they hand you the mic, you ask the question you want to?

I was dissapointed that CNN "folded" on asking the tough follow-up questions to incomplete or spun answers by the candidates. I believe Mr. Russert helped clearly point out the wekness in Mrs. Bill Clinton in being able to handle the tough rigors that come with being President of the United States. I was hoping to see how the other candidates faired under the same "heat". After all, if there is a terror stand-off or a nuclear showdown, we want a cool calm, well thought out head making the decisions. To-date it is obvious that one candidate is not up to the challange. Thank you Mr. Russert and I'm dissapointed with the "sheep" at CNN.

Oh God. Maria's a Democrat. She can't be that smart if she's planning on voting for a Democrat. God. And CNN--it's a socialist organization. Democrats are more interested in power than in national security. If she thinks the New York Times is an independent newspaper, she's more of an idiot than I originally thought. Finally, Hillary is dangerous and she certainly doesn't give a crap about the "common people." She just wants power. And if Democrats think Iran isn't our number one concern, they're idiots too. I will do everything in my power to stop the Democrats from taking the Presidency in this next election.

g

I watched the debate on the video stream on CNN.COM. After the debate they had a post debate show on CNN.COM and read several emails from viewers. All the ones they read were pro Clinton emails. Hello !!!!

We don't call CNN the Clinton News Network for no reason

*

Get real... you actually expect a Clinton to compete on a level playing field. That's just not how a Clinton plays. Nothing is left to chance with a Clinton, Americans are just not to be trusted to not bring up something that does not "poll" well.

This debate was all about damage control for the last debate. Hillary is as phony, contrived, and just plane dishonest as she and the rapist ever were.

Clintons: don't vote for them...JAIL THEM!

*

While I think Maria should have gone ahead and asked her original question when she had the mic, I wasn't there and so cannot really fault her for caving. Perhaps she was afraid of being tased.

"Diamonds or Pearls" makes no sense, but if you supplant "Man or Woman" or "Piercing or Tattoo" or "Birth or Death" then it makes sense for Hillary to say "Both"

So one reason the debate was so biased in favor of Hillary is because CNN (The Clinton News Network) got to pick the questions.

I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough to watch CNN.

as a democrat i fear that for sure the republicans are going to get in again. i hoped that hillary would be better than the mess we now have in her. she is really lousy and she has all that money and owns the media because she and bill threaten them. we democrats have to all support another major democrat and get rid of hillary. i say obama. it has to be him. i hope he can get in even though he is african american, because the republicans are gonna chew up and spit out hillary. a sad day for us all. i cant believe this garbage.

So our choices are; a woman, a black, an ambulance chasing lawyer. No Thanks/

Sorry, but this student says nothing in her own defense to bolster her image. While historically a fair publication, the Economist is more often now shown to be a publication that has turned to anti-administration proagandists who manipulate data in their commentary. But more important, anyone who dares to cite the New York Times as a fair, independent news source lives in a protective cocoon.

On balance I have to say that the idiotic question that she asked was actually better than that which she planned. Her screed re: Yucca Mountain, "Despite scientific evidence that it is a vulnerable site, the federal government continues to push for the plan to move forward. The evidence relied on is unsound and the risks involved in transporting ... radioactive waste across the country are high," is the same rhetoric that was pushed regarding WIPP to block its opening. But in its 7 years of operations WIPP has processed 5000 shipments of waste without incident, either in transport or in storage.

This Luisa girl stated that she had to submit 5 questions with one “fun” question --- DAYS IN ADVANCE --- which means that there is absolutely no doubt that the Clinton Camp also had those pre approved questions days in advance!

I’m afraid that when it comes to “Propaganda Politics”, Obama, and Edwards were little school boys that didn’t have a chance against the smooth and slimy Clinton Propaganda Machine. They got set up and knocked down in a completely pre-staged event produced on Clinton’s behalf. If I were them -- I'd be Pi$$ed!

• The CPM stacked the audience with Clinton flunkies to stop the real debate by booing Obama and Edwards whenever they went after Hilary and it worked like a charm. It Stopped them dead in their tracks.
• They had CNN pre-approve the all the questions, which means the CPM also knew exactly what was coming so there would be no surprises for Hilary.
• Wolfe Blitzer played the perfect lap-dog for Hilary so he would keep getting invited to all the cool parties.
• IF CNN chose the exact question for the Luisa girl to ask, they no doubt also chose the pre-canned questions of the others in the audience as well.

If this is what we can expect from CNN in the future debates, Both the Candidates and the Voters should BOYCOTT the other CNN sponsored debates.

That way we can skip illusion of a debate and just let Wolfe tell Hilary how wonderful and smart she is all evening.
This was truly disgusting to watch and I won’t make that mistake again if it’s on CNN. I’ve Blocked that channel from my TV!

Please pass the koolaide!
Maybe then I will be able to understand what it is that people see in Hillary, Obama, and the rest of them.

EVERYONE HERE HAS MISSED THE BIG POINT!!! Let's be honest - who cares about a nobody student or a worthless cable 'news' network? The bigger issue was in the ANSWER to this question! If Hillary (or any candidate) wants to score big when handed such a dopey question, they should respond with something like this:

"You have just been given the chance of a lifetime to ask the potential leader of the free world a question on national TV that could help shape the result of an entire presidential election, and you asked me THAT? It is NOT worthy of this debate, and I will NOT dignify it with an answer. We have very serious issues to face in this country and so little time to address them."

An instant 10 point leap in the polls! Also, no network would ever again dare to take this route. But you have to 'earn it', and Hillary was not quick enough to seize the opportunity. Just think Thatcher - now there is a REAL leader who would have swatted that one back with a look that could kill...

The MSM thrives on scripting and manipulating the masses as shown by this debate It was obvious that Hillary was their girl (Wolf Blitzer’s along with the audience) from the beginning.

On the immigration driver's licenses issue they gave her an obvious softball pass.

Why didn't they get ask some common sense questions, such as.... do you believe in full control of our borders and strict enforcement of immigration laws before any consideration of amnesty?

Or would you vote against AIPAC and Israel's interests if it was obviously in USA's interest?

It was not a debate. It was a group interview. All they did was listen to media windbags pontificate and respond with sound bites.

Oh how far we have fallen from the Lincoln-Douglass debates.

This is the first of the Democrat debates that I watched and could not believe how incompetent they all sounded. On top of that I believe the front runner (Hillery) is dishonest! WOW! I am ready for a women, black or hispanic, but they should be qualified for the job.

I think the last question should have been changed to "OK Hillary, which is it . . .
tampons or pads?"

they should've asked the hildabeast..."so, how many people do you see committing suicide in YOUR administration...and do you madam hildabeast, forsee russert being "fosterized" in the near future?"

Someone mentioned that CNN (Wolf Blitzer) and Hillary are alike and why do you suppose that is?

Let me enlighten you... wolf blitzer is a former AIPAC lobbyist. Guess who Hillary gets a huge chunk of her support from?? You guessed it, the same Lobby that put Bush in office. AIPAC.

And now, you know the rest of the story! Between AIPAC, the Israeli Lobby, the Military industrial complex, and Fox news and Murdock, who else would be the elites pick, your candidate has been chosen for you and all players are in place to support that decision... it will be Hillary!

The top runners are Hillary, Obama, and Edwards and what do they all have in common along with Dick Cheney???? They are all active members of the CFR... council on foreign relations that wrote the recommendations for regionalizing the US with Mexico and Canada and doing away with our borders and our sovereignty. In other words every single one of them had a hand in that document.

Hmmmm Guess Kucinich, who got very little coverage, is out of the race since the elite doesn't want him to win. He doesn't belong to the CFR and Rockefellers minions or support rocky's agenda for perpetual war and globalizing.

Good luck voting if you pick anyone but kucinich who is the only true democrat up there, the rest are simply NEOCONS. Dennis who got very little floor time from CNN, has been the only one standing for principle without flipflopping around.

The only good news in all of this is the republicans are having the same problem on their side with ron paul.... they do the same to him they do to Dennis. Wouldn't it be a great ticket to have either Dennis or Paul as the Presidential candidate and the other one the VP... boy would that throw them all for a huge loop. Then lets see what a real debate looks like.

Hillary has been talking legalese for so long she has forgotten how to talk straight. That was evident during the entire debate.

To all of you commenters that think she should have asked the question she wanted to ask rather than the one they approved, don't you remember "Don't Taze me, bro!!!"?

"Diamonds Or Pearls?"

How 'bout "Hot Carl or Cleveland Steamer"

HAPPY FRIDAY!

Does it make any difference whether the tickets were distributed by unlv or the Nevada dem party? They're both frothing-at-the-mouth psychotic liberal institutions. It's like the difference between getting hit by a bus or a train, is it really worth discussing? Another embarrassing night for liberals and their MSM puppets, another great night for the GOP without even uttering a word. The MSM pronouncements of her "comeback victory" will live in media infamy.

Dennis Kucinich got the least amount of time... but CLEARLY is the only candidate that has not been bought and sold ten times over by corporate interests.

He is going to come from behind and he might even win... IF enough of us pull our heads out of the sand long enough to vote for the ISSUES. Every position Kucinich stands for on the issues... is what more than 75% of American's believe.

He is a candidate for the working man... for the REAL people. Not for the stuffed shirts and the corporate boardroom types.

The people of this country are controlled, and kept in the dark, by the corporations through a biased main stream media (owned by corporate interests). People who feel afraid and hopeless give up their power. Keep people in fear by keeping them in debt and tying their healthcare to their jobs and you make them feel hopeless... so they don't vote.

Votes MATTER. We CAN take back this country from the corporate interests if we vote the ISSUES... and are not fooled by 30 second sound bites or distracted by non-issues. Do the research and you will see that Kucinich has a solid, common sense approach to the problems of this country.

Get out there and vote for a man of the people. It is true that the best things sometimes come in small packages!

Dennis is THE MAN!!
http://www.dennis4president.com

America will get the president she deserves and from where I sit, it looks like America is about to do "Bill Clinton, part 2."

China must be ecstatic - They finally will get their hands on whatever military secrets the first Clinton failed to oblige them with.

[ROFL]... oh.... oh.... that is rich...

"if you want to read about real issues important to America... I suggest you pick up a copy of ...the New York Times or some other independent source..."

New York Times... an independent source? Oh my goodness... oh man... I can't breathe... gotta stop laughing... ahem ahem ahem...

OK... seriously though, CNN forced her to ask that question? I don't think so.

This college chick is just a product of modern culture in that she refuses to take responsibility for her own actions.

There are always choices... she had a number of choices... she could have: just not asked the question, defied CNN and asked her silly other question anyway, etc. There are ALWAYS choices.

She just needs to take responsibility for choosing to ask what she did. Period. She can say she's sorry... that she was caught up in the whole circus... whatever. But don't blame CNN for this. (And that is coming from someone who has reviled CNN for years... and still does, for that matter).

Why does that last question sound in context so eerily like "What do you wear, boxers or briefs?" by another "brilliant" mtv college student. Deja Vu all over again.

Not only did the Hillary Camp make sure that Wolf Blitzer was made to only ask Hillary soft questions that would be easy for her.. Now we got Cnn pulling this crap...... Staged, Scripted and bought and paid for by the Democrats and Cnn and its other supporters

Libers are not protected from the wrath of the 2 Clinton Dynasty...All heil Queen Clinton

Libers are not protected from the wrath of the 2 Clinton Dynasty...All heil Queen Clinton

Libers are not protected from the wrath of the 2 Clinton Dynasty...All heil Queen Clinton

She should have just refused to step up to mike and ask that question.

I'm right of center politically, and no "feminist" by ANY stretch of the imagination, but even I thought that question was chauvinistic of CNN to give to that young lady.

a debate will only be as good as the individuals.
networks,handlers and hacks can only do so much.
"garbage in garbage out"
the future looks rocky for us all.

Looks like the Clinton gang rigged this one with CNN. I do not like Obama, Edwards and to a lesser extent Dodd but this whole debate was rigged for Hillary. CNN is a disgrace.

Did this girl have a gun to head ordering her to answer that ridic questions? What a fool. She made herself, and other young women, look like complete idiots.

Money question from clueless coed, 2007-style: "Senator Clinton, the world wants to know: spit or swallow?"

The chick should have asked the question about Yucca Mountain that she wanted to ask. After all, what could they have done to her? (Other than turn off her microphone, have 3 cops hustle her out of the room - knocking her to the floor and tasering her on the way, and then charging her with disturbing the peace unless she agreed to shut her mouth in the future.)

Isn't 21st Century American democracy great? It's just the thing that God wants us to impose on the Iraqis.

This used to be a great country. (sigh)

Who cares about the diamonds or pearls question?the one that should have been asked her is"when staging phony suicide attempts ,do you prefer left or right handed gun blasts,ie foster &willey.How long do you suppose before we have clinton campaign officials showing up at rivals campaign stops and planting questions as the local campaign?That way we can say they all do it.Like the clinton campaign making calls about the mormon faith and the MSM wondering if it is rudy or mccain,ya right.This is just the beginning of the most corrupt presidential campaign in this nations history.Brought to you by cnn,msnbc,nbc,abc,&cbs.No wonder they won't debate on fox.Might get some real questions America wants answered.

So if the moderator asks HRC a tough question, then they are anti-Clinton? Wow, this woman is going to skate into the nomination.

As much as Clinton News Network staffers(gaffers?) must DESPISE having to work shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs they know they are a necessary evil for the station otherwise CNN would go by the way of the Dodo and Err America, as they are the only two that can generate any kind of ratings at all!!!

Is anyone suprised? We're talking about CNN and Clinton here. No wonder so many potential voters have such disdain and apathy for politics and government. We keep supporting the corruption. We keep talking about it as if it wasn't happening here.

I am a Democrat, but this is one more reason why I am supporting Dr. Ron Paul for President.

Our political system is so rotten down to the very core that we need to plant a new tree, not trim some branches.

Ron Paul has inspired a REVOLUTION. Google him, or look him up on Youtube. WATCH what he says and does, it's going to get interesting.

Freedom. Liberty. Ron Paul. CNN and Billary Clinton can kiss my ass. Their all lying to us. How many more years of Bush/Clinton do we really want?

It is getting more apparent by the day the smartest people in America are the ones who either never attended four year colleges or dropped out early. Seriously, except for engineering and medical students, what the hell are the other majors worth, even science has become politicized by liberalism, might as well outsource them too!!!!!!!!!

The fact that I dont watch CNN, and dont even have, or PAY for cable, and don't PAY for a news paper subscription IS my statement on the current state of "media". I get my news from talk radio and the internet where I can quickly browse for GOOD WELL WRITTEN, and challenging material written by the amatures of commentary who are are many times more thought provoking, and who challenge me and my though process more than the over educated and arrogant "professional" journalist.

All you have to know: Hillary is essentially a co-rapist. No management or leadership experience, no integrity, completely unable to assume responsibility for anything less than the perfection of over spent lies. Both she and Bill are loathed (that word again, Billy)by our men and women in our armed forces - beyond loathed, hated. As a combat veteren, VN 69-70, they both are beneath contempt.

Ron Paul will eat their lunch.

Want another republican in the White House? Give Billary the Dem Nomination.
She will buckle under real pressure. Obviously CNN and even her own people know this. Why else would she be handed all the favoritism in this last so called debate???? And still not be a clear winner. There has to be someone better than her!

Simply amazing and terrifying. This great country can do no better than this cast of egomaniacal, self-serving compusive liars. Sad and dangerous for this nation.
A liberal or conservative outlook is of no real consequence to me anymore. Where can we find a person of integrity and fortitude who has an actual interest in the country?
Hilary will take ANY position that is deemed politically expedient. Edwards "the poser" makes me ill. The rest seem no better.

I couldn't bare to watch all of it, so switched to "Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader", and no, CNN is not smarter than a fifth grader, and neither is Hillary and her cohorts.

Most of you people are ridiculous with your anit-Clinton banter. Hillary is so obviously the best and smartest choice.

And as for that a** who made the "bitch" comment, I would say: That's President Bitch to you!

Hillary couldn't tell the truth if her life depended on it. Sadly, neither can any of the other candidates. I want a "None Of The Above" on any ballot that comes out. Maybe we need to vote for Stephen Colbert! He's the only one I can trust.

"CNN lost another chunk of the 10 percent credibility they had left."

So what does that leave? .0000001%?

I find myself watching CNN less and less. I think last night did it for me, no more CNN. That was a joke. I really wanted to hear Hillary have to answer the tough questions. Anyone who can not has no business being even considered for President.
No more Clintons or Bushes. It is time for some new ideas and new people!

So sad that CNN makes our college students act like 10th grade welfare recipients w/o any ideas between their ears.

No wonder they don't allow FOX to be hosts. They (CNN, candidates and politicians) wouldn't understand FIRST - the question and SECOND - might not get it RIGHT!!!

Last night, Biden appeared to be the least objectionable of several dwarfs.

With regard to the pearls vs. diamonds question, what did you expect, people? As James Earl Jones would say, "This is CNN".

I don't think you would hear a diamonds vs. pearls questions if the Dems had the guts to debate on Fox News.

Damnit Diamonds or Pearls which one did she go for? Or did she say both have extremely good qualities and then decided to declare war against them?

Did this girl have a gun to head ordering her to answer that ridic questions?
Posted by Cherie | November 16, 2007 8:30 PM

- - - - -

Uhh . . . with the Clintons, this is not such a big stretch of the imagination.

Does HRC wear boxers or briefs, and they made of ass-bestos?

Thank God for (oops, can I say that name anymore?)
lengthy campaigns. Each month we find revealed what a shallow, deceptive, ambitious airhead Hillary is.
No one needs to beat her, she's doing it to herself.

I was undecided until I saw last night's debate.

Ron Paul has my vote.

CNN and Wolf Blitzer reminds me (I'M old ) of a world war movie in the forties and Wolf is a German spy capatured my the English military .
He's little man who's told what to say .In a mans world ,Wolf wouldn't have made the team.
He is CNN A LOSER in the Debates

I have never had much respect for Blitzer and his ex-AIPAC credentials. It doesn't take much to know where is loyalty and agenda lies, and it most definitely is not for helping the USA find a POTUS candidate that will best serve the interests of the USA.

If he was an ex-agent of China or Russia or North Korea we'd be better off as at least we could complain without being ridiculously accused of racism by Abe Foxman.

UPDATED WOLFFY ole BOY hum? "CNN host outstanding" I guess you dont have balls!
Category: News and Politics


Prove it Wolffy ole Boy and ask Hillary the same question if you have the BALLS!!!
Category: News and Politics

CNN's Wolf Blitzer has been warned not to focus Thursday's Dem debate on Hillary.

'This campaign is about issues, not on who we can bring down and destroy,' top Clinton insider explains.

'Blitzer should not go down to the levels of character attack and pull 'a Russert.

'' Blitzer is set to moderate debate from Vegas, with questions also being posed by Suzanne Malveaux...

Blitzer says he is not being pressured by any campaign:
'No one has pressured me.

No one has threatened me.

No one is trying to intimidate me'


I guess you are truly a american liberal after all!

When people ask me why I am an anarchist, I refer them to incidents like this. So long as there is a ruling class of whores scrambling for power, they will control information and communication and education ad the currency. Power is all they want. Well-educated intellectual morons who vote for power lusters like Clinton or Giuliani are responsible for the mess the world is in. Leadership requires followership in large quantities. It is up to the government-licensed media and the government-run schools to provide lots of followers. They do it well.

Most of you people are ridiculous with your anit-Clinton banter. Hillary is so obviously the best and smartest choice.

And as for that a** who made the "bitch" comment, I would say: That's President Bitch to you!

Posted by Wendy


Not in a million years Wendy (a million is a really big number, sorry about that. By the way, what's anit mean?)

Why do you think it's known as the Clinton News Network? In the pre-debate discussion with the pundits one Clinton mouth piece started listing Bill Clinton’s accomplishments and used welfare reform as his greatest. No one on the panel bothered to mention that he VETOED it TWICE and only signed it because the votes to override it were there. With CNN, reporting is deceiving people into believing what you want them to. And ignoring the facts that don't fit their preconceived notions. Like when Blitzer started freaking out in 2004 when it was apparent that Bush had won. It was laughable.

The only people that declare wars are republicans. I can't believe there is all of this CNN bashing, at least it is not FOX News! That cannot even be called a news station, there is absolutely no true news reporting there. If anyone wants to get true news they will get it on independent sources from the net or just watch the Daily Show and Colbert Report!!

"Hillary is so obviously the best and smartest choice"? If voting for HRC is supposedly based on thoughtful debate, why is the 'gender' card always the lead point? The 'diamond and pearls' question reminds me of the lame 'boxers and briefs' inquiry to Bubba at the MTV 'townhall' meeting in '92. The MSM is trying hard to shamelessly coronate queen Hillary. Thankfully, we are a republic and coronations were left behind in Europe, Asia, Africa and wherever the founding fathers came from.

What an inane, self-serving spectacle. Clearly the whole event was set to push Hillary and the CNN "talent" was either too stupid or too venal to prevent it. All her cackling, the "analysts" who had all worked for them, and finally Diamonds or Pearls -I'm done with CNN.

WOW!! Lets see, a debate that has pre-approved questions...sounds like state controlled media like Russia or China. Pathetic, so much for a free America....you have been hoodwinked, you have no choice or voice and your vote surly does not count. I live in a communist country, and it's called America! Freedom is sham!!

What a disgrace.....I have never seen any debate so badly presented... Clearly pro Clinton.... of all of the candidates Biden showed the most resonable answers...

Take it all in good humor, it is an act. Hillary is already anointed as the next President. All this lead up stuff is just entertainment leading to the final act. Enjoy watching the script because you have no input.

What's one more softball in a softball game?

Doesn't Hillary really betray her femenist roots by riding her philanderings husband's coat-tails?

What is respectable about that?

This is another confirmation that the Clinton Hitmen Squad do their job. Wolf was warned by the Clinton's to be a good boy and he caved in. He was disgusting how he kissed butt to Hillarious Hillary. This was a setup to make her look good with mink gloves. She could not handle another serious moderator like Russert. All softballs from The Toothless Wolf. The Clintons own the media and if anyone steps out of line they are dead meat. I pray for Maria Luisa that her future will not be ruined. Her question was another Clinton plant posed by CNN.

the girl caved in to Clinton news network. She should have asked the hard question and let the chips fall where they may. It isn't as if this girl could be fired by CNN she is a student or maybe she is a plant hired by CNN? the plot thickens

They don't call CNN the Clinton News Network for nothin'!

every person who says that HRC was picked on in the last debate and claims they are not a supporter of hillbill, is either a moron or a flat out lier!!(I WOULD SAY A PLANT FROM THE MIGHTY CLINTON WAR MACHINE) russert was just trying to get a straight answer from her.(and she still has changed her mind since changing it on stage in the debate).

There should be a movement agreed upon by every dissatisfied person out there to not elect Clinton or Giulliani on the basis of upsetting the establishment.

whats the surprise? its CNN for crying out loud.
what did anyone expect? a fair and balanced debate?

The Yucca was already asked and discussed. She was asked to write down questions serious and silly. She did so..so shut the f up! You got on T.V., now go on FOX "news" and bitch.

What a JOKE!
The Yucca mountain question is just as vapid and irrelevant.(Obscure Scholarship notwithstanding) CNN and the mainstream media will always promote the Clintons in any form, for any office. Anyone who beleives that debates are not staged is deluded.

Hi, you guys really need to watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

It's by a guy named Evan Sayet, who used to be a writer for Bill Maher.

It's very important for people to understand Evan's theory as it explains why the Modern Liberals (as he calls them) want us to lose in Iraq, don't want us to drill for more oil, have a mediocre healthcare system, are against the 2nd Amendment, for taking control of our kids away from the parents, etc. You'll see why they naturally take all of these positions - even when it is obvious that the results are harmful.

Conservative people have been dancing around this stuff for years as we cannot really comprehend why Liberals are like they are. Well, this video explains it.

You'll need some quiet time - about 45 minutes to watch it. The Q&A at the end is very good.

Bill was asked, ..."boxers or briefs". The girl should of ask Hill if she was back in diapers yet?
That would of been as interesting as any of that other piffle we heard. Like I heard someone say one time,"They only lie when their lips move", that's the only thought that ran through my mind last night.

I thought Biden won, but even he looked resigned to the idea that CNN had picked their candidate and he didn't have a chance in that venue.

So will CNN be at the table to bail her out when she's faltering in talks with IRAN? Or will they just cover it in the news as the president is doing a superb job in talks and making progress when she's actually lost ground and probably surrendered because she can't hold her own in debate.

when someone can show many ANY large organization that HRC has ever successfully led, I might consider her candidacy legitimate.

until then - I think her experience is insufficient

Mitt Romney 08

The big loser was the Democratic party. Nobody looked like a credible Presidential candidate. It was so tacky, they all seemed kinda silly and sleazy at the same time. Even Wolf Blitzer came off like that barely competant substitute teacher who shows up unprepared.

I believe CNN was ordered to go soft on Hillary because of all the negative press she has suffered lately. Hillary WILL be elected to office next year, that much has already been decided by those in attendance at Bilderberg in the Brookstreet Hotel, in Ottowa, Canada last year. Heck, she even showed up for half a day to accept (a felony violation of the Logan Act).

Everyone is afraid of Bush and what he will do. He is called Hitler...but he is only laying the pipe for what Hillary will step into and take advantage of.

Her husband made it acceptable for Feds to murder our own citizens (Waco, Ruby Ridge). Bush made it acceptable for the military to patrol the streets (Mexican and Dutch troops patrolling New Orleans post-Katrina) and for private security contractors (read: Blackwater mercenaries) to enforce drug laws; and believe me, it won't be a far jump for them to begin enforcing anti-terrorism laws.

Now, Hillary is going to come in and nexus the two previous presidents' "advances" in law enforcement. A lot of people are going to die under her watch, and the liberals are going to excuse every second of it because there will be a female Democrat at the helm of it all. The conservatives will put up with it because she is going to expand the war on terrorism.

Rupert Murdoch is holding fund-raisers for her. Roger Ailes is meeting with her. The money behind Bush knows that they cannot get another Republican into office and they are lining up behind Hillary. These people expect results for their contributions and Hillary is not the kind of person who will disappoint her benefactors.

There are no choices left. Nobody to vote for. I'm a Ron Paul voter but I don't believe he will be given the nomination and he has already stated that he is not interested in running third-party.

If I may very loosely paraphrase Warren Zevon...

Send Precious Metals, Guns and Stored Food.

Hold on tight and don't forget to wave hello to Iran, the Amero and the North American Union.

Think of the bright side Maria. At least those hacks from CNN didn't make you ask if she prefers panties or a thong!

The Clinton News Network pandered to a Clinton one more time. They soft soaped Hillary, and hammered Obama.

Nice job CNN, proving once agin they are very far from Fair and Balanced.

Get on your knees Wolf, and eat Hillary - but for what? You lost my last spec of respect for you and for CNN. CNN sucks these days.

Go Obama!!!

I truly beleive that the Dems will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory next year. Don't give up Pat!

Hey, now you democrats are finally starting to see what it's like when the CFR-controlled media starts messing with your side of the political spectrum. Vote AGAINST any candidate who is on the Council on Foreign Relations. They are the collective "think thank" behind the "one world" agenda adopted by Bush 1, Clinton (terms 1 & 2) and Bush 2. Twenty years of this crap is enough. Vote Ron Paul.

I'd have liked to hear someone ask why we are not drilling for oil in Alaska considering the current price of fuel

I am confused as to why CNN needed to host this debate. Why don't they just do 24/7 news coverage saying Hillary is our choice, and all you sheeple need to just vote for her?

Why the deception of a slanted moderated debate were Hillary is treated like a queen, and others are just flotsam to make Hillary look good? Why no hard questions for Hillary? Why a jewelry question for Hillary.

What a huge crock!!!!!!!!!!!!

CNN has zero credibility, and Wolf either chickened out, or was ordered to make Hillary his "girl".

What a waste of air time from the "Clinton News Network"

Excuse me while I go vomit.

Diamonds or Pearls? And she couldn't even make decision on that!
The Clinton News Network did a fine job with the Hillary Clinton infomercial. Wolf Blizter, court jester, should be proud of his performance and the way he treated the Queen. The second-level follow-up questions were insightful and provided all viewers the necessary information to make a voting decision, wait a minute there were no second level questions. The Senator has a problem answering questions because even she knows how morally bankrupt the Marxists ideas are. Her goal is to get elected, of course she may not be able to answer the yes or no questions asked during the inauguration.
The good news is We the People will get What We Deserve, thats the great thing about our democracy.

You expected Clinton and the Democraps to really answer "any questiions" they can't control? Are you kidding, Clinton News Network and girly man Wolfie would just faint if you ask all those Gas Bags a REAL question. Thats why they won't win in 2008. They are all phoney.

I don't even remember her question subject matter, but didn't everyone notice the woman who had to repeat the question under her breath to herself as she tried to remember what CNN told her to ask? It was quite a struggle for her to remember it all!

Wolf the Bullshit did a great job. At one time, he sucked Bill Clinton, ate Hillary's pussy, and took CNNs dick right up his ass.

Way to go Wolf, you had sex with 3 people on prime time. You must have studied under Bill the Molester and Hillary the enabler.

Another victory for that douchebag Wolf Blitzer and CNN (Clinton news network). Could they bend over any more for Queen Hillary or possibly give her more softball questions? If I were Obama or John Edwards, I would seriously reconsider any further CNN debates. Shame on CNN and that pudwacker Wolf Blitzer.

Bet this never gets posted!

How many women does Bill Clinton have to rape (allegedly) in order to alienate the womens' libbers? Pathetic.

I did not see the debate since I was working but I have heard parts of it all day long. The most ironic thing is how Hillary continually uses the "girl" card. You know when another candidate or Tim Russert challenges her statements or position she says, "These men are mean to me just because I am a girl". She should stop that whining. It isn't believable and if the other candidates don't call her on it they are idiots with less cajones than Hillary. To top it off, she got the pearls or diamonds questions and that is such an stupid question but it furthered her stereotype that she is trying to use against men.She should have been wearing pink and a tiara.

Hillary's strategy will backfire.

She has been at it so long and so desperatly she will not be able to resist whipping out her secret weapon, Bill, so much that the American people will be nauseated by he time the general election comes around Even the Clinton groupies will realize they are not quite ready for for 4 years of more scandals. But this time it will be from BOTH barrels. Bill would generate so many scandals from the co-pilots seat that it would dominate Hillary's agenda.

I think the thought of it will sicken even the Dems.

By the time the election nears. Everybody will alraedy have their fill of the Clintons and will fall back on a more crdeible alternative. Any of the Republican candidates (well ...almost any) will suffice.

McCracken, if you truly believe that Colbert and the Daily Show represent 'true news', than you are as well informed as the young lady who thought that the NYT was unbiased. I am willing to bet that you have never even watched Fox News because of your pre-formed biases.

Actually, perhaps Wolf has been offered the press secretary job at the White House. Tony Snow showed it could be done.

I'm very disappointed in the younger generation. Where is the courage? Once she has the mike in her hand and the cameras focussed on her, CNN has absolutely no control over what she says. Why didn't she ask a very good question about Yucca Mountain?

OKAY OKAY SO THE YOUNG NAIVE STUDENT BLEW HER ONE AND ONLY CHANCE TO SEEM RELEVENT AND SMART. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SOLDIER AND HIS MOMMY WHO WERE SO ANGRY ABOUT DAT BAD ODE WAR. BOO HOO -- YOU TWO WERE DISGUSTING WHEN THERE ARE REAL MEN OUT THERE IN IRAG AND AFGHAN DOING THEIR BEST TO SAVE YOUR ASSES. GOOD THING YOU BROUGHT MOMMY TO SPEAK FOR YOU MAYBE YOU SHOULD ASK MOMMY TO GO OVER TO IRAQ FOR YOU TOO - POOR BABY --- YOU C O W A R D!

Hillary cried Wolf.

The Wolf cowered away in fear - or perhaps was bribed or threatened. The big bad Wolf turned out to be a lamb, and he got sheared big time. His testicles were put in the lock box.

What a crock of shit.


While flipping channels after a long day of file auditing, I stumbled across the Dem debate and found myself rolling with laughter so hard I nearly fell off my chair!

It was like a visual and mental roller-coaster ride for the senses! I don't think I have been so entertained in a long while; what with all the crap coming out of Hollywood you know. It was refreshing to see our politicians as they really are..., Bozo, Gonzo and all the rest of their ilk!

Too bad..., I've really loved being an American and after the show's amazing finale, I realized that it had pierced something deep inside to see the freak-show our Leaders and fellow countrymen (i.e., CNN), have become.

If there was ever a time for prayer, it is now and this is the place..

Between Wolf and Carville, CNN just traded their credibility for some future payoff that Billary owes them.

Also watch to see if some huge Chinese money "somehow" gets invested in CNN within the next 6 months.

Las Vegas debate? Yawn... Wake me up when the real candidates debate.
Member of the vast Capitalist conspiracy.
Now I know how my great grandfather felt before he left the old country to come to America.
Re-defeat communism!

Marc, thanks for posting the story. Matt Drudge, thanks for linking to the story. And, in advance, thanks to Rush, Sean, Neal, and Michael, for covering this story next week on your talk shows.

Visualize whirled peas.

If you think CNN is biased, try ANY local Boston area media outlet.

They don't call it the Clinton Network News (CNN) for nothing.

These are the critical thinking skills being taught in our colleges? The media and republicrats behave like this because we keep letting them, not because that's reality. Stop voting for idiots, and you'll start setting your own reality.

"I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That's what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality."

CNN broadcast Saddam's propaganda before the invasion - in trade for being allowed to broadcast. Through some twist of logic they thought being there was more important than truth.

Same thing happened last night. Different tyrant, same trade. Wolf got the word from the Clinton camp - don't pull a Russert...

'Diamonds or pearls' plays to the superficial stereotype of women and is a mindnumbingly stupid - everybody knows Hillary is all cubic zirconium. Fake to the core.

We all know what would have happened if she asked the wrong question...

DONT TAZE ME BRO!!!


zzzt

I note that she never says what the question was. "What is your opinion of Yucca Flat?" That would be a waste of time. What was this vaunted and sacred query?

Rob Mac, since when is it "attacking" when journalists ask hard questions of political candidates? Somehow, I always thought that was their job. Or am I in the wrong country here? Are they just supposed to feed them easy question that make the candidates look good? That is why the MSM is viewed so badly today by the majority of Americans.

Some lady in the audience took about 90 seconds to ask a question and she kept losing her place but recalling every word of the question. I wish someone would have a look because it seemed so planted!

It seems that most of us were disappointed by the debate. Why? We will not see quality debates until we have quality candidtes. This bunch just demonstrates, yet once again, that none of them have the attributes of a statesman.

I didn't catch Hillary's response, but I'd bet she opted for diamonds.

After all, Monica got the pearl necklace.

Well folks, what are the five most scary words in the world?

HILLARY CLINTON, COMMANDER IN CHIEF !

"Prince made the song Diamonds and Pearl popular. Is this what is sounds like when the doves cry? Seriously, Clinton INC are millimeters left of center. This nation is leaning further right day by day. It is sad. Please all Anti-Hillary supporters rally to one true democrat. Just be cause she is labeled a democrat does not mean she represents you."

What in the hell are you talking about? Hilary is about as far left as you can get. she's not a democrat though, she's a Stalinist, and no world leader will take the woman seriously.

The only reason she's a candidate is her last name. She runs on a platform of 'well I was in the white house', yet it just happens to be that currently, info on anything she did then, won't be available until after the elections, how convenient for her.


All 3 of the democrat party front runners are political lightweights with no real leadership experience. God help them if they're ever foolish enough to go up against the Republican front runners in a debate.

Really. PlantGirl I (Iowa) and PlantaGirl II (Nevada). PlantGirl I was attacked by Clinton, Inc. for a question the Hillary folks planted. O.K.. PlantGirl II was attacked by CNN. Sure these are both coincidences(?), but I submit that they are not singular in form and bias. There is something fishy going on with Hillary and CNN. This poor woman is a pawn of the vast Clinton/CNN coincidence conspiracy. Hey? How do you know when Hillary is lying? Her lips, and the subjugated lips of Clinton hangers-on are moving. I hold Hillary in Contempt.

first of all asking hillary relevant questions is not a form of attack. I like the modderator was curious about her messed up positions on the matter.

Not following up on the same topic at this latest debate after hillary obviously has changed positions 3 or 4 more times is just criminally negligent for the host of this debate. If clinton had a good answer it would not be considered an attack. Any time she gets stuck its somebody else fault.

The lame question at the end of the debate was so moronic BUT it did provide yet another example of why not to vote for her. Like most every other topic she landed on both sides again.

Blitzer is a little boring monotone...never liked him before..like him even less now.

I thought Joe Biden gave the best performance.

Now we know why CNN is losing audience share!

I dont get any of this. I just want someone to answer real questions from real people. Why should the sacred cow (CNN) be able to see what questions can and cannot be asked.

I am considered a nut job and a conspiracy theorist. I am put in the same category as 911 truthers, who i heartily disagree with but they are welcome to their opinions and to ask questions. I will ALWAYS be considered a conspiracy theorist because no questions can be asked about certain issues. Like Guliiani with his company building superhighways with Cintra. Will he be asked this? NO!I want real questions, real debate, and a real candidate. As someone who is an issue voter and hate parties, I AM PISSED!

STOP ASKING QUESTIONS FOR ME! STOP WITH STUPID BS! I WANT TO KNOW WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU STAND FOR, AND WHAT YOU WILL DO FOR THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!!!!!!

The only one who does this is Ron Paul, but I cannot vote for someone who leaves Israel fend for themselves, and is backed by the KKK.

Anyway, contact me with love or hate, just be dont be political, be REAL!!!

Who cares if the disease is from an Elephant or a Donkey, just kill the virus! not to hard. dang, I am so worked up.

Personally, I don't care! We have very poor candidates to choose from anyway!

The ones that would work for ALL citizens, and not special groups, don't get the financial backing they deserve....probably because they don't kowtow to these special interests groups!

As for the girl, I would have bit my tongue, before I would ask such a stupid question...even if that's what CNN wanted.

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate.

This was actually a brilliant satire by Maria.

Here is the inside "joke":
Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

CNN was simply embarassing, nothing more than a Clinton certified version of Fox. Everything from the audience fix (Clinton's campaign got 900 tickets, with 100 other tickets going to UNLV students, and *packed* the audience), to Wolff Blitzer's cravenly weak caving into the Clinton machine's demands -to- his softball questions of her, to Carville being an independent analyst, and these planted questions, makes one believe that CNN needs to publically acknowledge that their handling of these debates amounted to their being used as a PR tool in her campaign.

If I have to hear one more time about how all the 90 year old ladies come up to Hillary while she is on the road to tell her they can't wait to see a woman in the WH, I'm going to puke all over my fake driver's license I use to make sure I can illegally vote in this country.

Welcome to Communism 101, kids. All hail Hillary.

REAL EMAIL!!! devilbunnyfrank@live.com

I dont get any of this. I just want someone to answer real questions from real people. Why should the sacred cow (CNN) be able to see what questions can and cannot be asked.

I am considered a nut job and a conspiracy theorist. I am put in the same category as 911 truthers, who i heartily disagree with but they are welcome to their opinions and to ask questions. I will ALWAYS be considered a conspiracy theorist because no questions can be asked about certain issues. Like Guliiani with his company building superhighways with Cintra. Will he be asked this? NO!I want real questions, real debate, and a real candidate. As someone who is an issue voter and hate parties, I AM PISSED!

STOP ASKING QUESTIONS FOR ME! STOP WITH STUPID BS! I WANT TO KNOW WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU STAND FOR, AND WHAT YOU WILL DO FOR THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!!!!!!

The only one who does this is Ron Paul, but I cannot vote for someone who leaves Israel fend for themselves, and is backed by the KKK.

Anyway, contact me with love or hate, just be dont be political, be REAL!!!

Who cares if the disease is from an Elephant or a Donkey, just kill the virus! not to hard. dang, I am so worked up.

"I,m very disappointed in the younger generation. Where is the courage? Once she has the mike in her hand and the cameras focussed on her, CNN has absolutely no control over what she says. Why didn't she ask a very good question about Yucca Mountain?"

Nice point Tom. Not to attack the young girl personally, but where the hell is the rebellion and defiance with this generation? I don't see the passion and distrust of authority which we had as teens and young adults. Those traits empower and energize kids and hopefully ferment decisive well thought out opinion later in life. I guess in the age of "everybody wins" baseball leagues and competition at any level viewed unhealthy, the motivation for confrontation might be missing...

Ms. Lewinsky got a pearl necklace from Bill. I bet Hillary really like pearls.

The word down on the Strip is that shortly before the debate dear little Maria Luisa had been physically threatened with deportation backstage by the snake-headed James Carville and was equally terrorized into asking the deplorable Diamonds and Pearls question by Wolfe Blitzer, who Rudy says looks good in drag.

Wolfie, stop interrupting people all the time... Stop it! Stop! Guys like Richardson and Biden you cut off in mid-sentence, just when they began to launch into a critique of Washington insiders and bureaucrats. Seems like you had certain areas you were ordered to keep unexplored and off limits.

Just another CNN/FOX stage-managed political distraction meant to keep the sheeple befuddled and perplexed... I mean entertained!

Boxers or briefs?
Diamonds or Pearls?
Republican or Democrat?
Constitution or Illegal Wiretaps?
Honest Elections or Electronic Voting Machines?
Habeas Corpus or Martial Law?
Ron Paul or WWIII?

Post by Elsie earlier pretty much called Dobbs a racist. This is nonsense. The racist defense of illegal immigration is ignorant.

Most sane Americans want security. We are not goign to get that with a wide open border with a country that encourages their own people to leave the country, that outsources IT jobs to India, that does almost nothing to help educate its own citizens, that almost does nothing to clean up its country of criminals, drugs, kidnappers.

It is greatly offending to me that foreigners come into my country unscreened for drugs, criminal history, or disease.

The USA is in debt enough to allow millions more people that do not want to learn english..that want free services that I am paying for from my hard work. There's already been more than 100 hospitals in the southern USA closed down solely due to the free services given to illegal Mexicans.

The USA is being invaded and being taken advantage. They are abusing our system and could care less for our laws.

No contributions to the tax base, no contributions to the social security system..but they want free education, free public safety services, free medicine.

Actually it would be better for the world if the USA invaded Mexico and cleaned up that country so that they could support themselves. Right now Mexican politicans seem to want to do more for Mexicans in the USA, than Mexicans in Mexico.

I live in a border state and our crime rate has skyrocketed due to the illegal Mexicans running amuck through the neighborhoods at night prawling. Looking to steal whatever is available.

The purpose for immigration is valid: to screen people for disease, for a history of crime, to check their qualifications, and to fulfill quotas.

We've got hundreds of thousands of highly educated people from other countries waiting in line to follow the LAW of US immigration. They speak english and can provide high skills for our workforce. But due to quotas many of them can not come in. The quotas for Mexico have filled for the next 200 yrs. No more Mexicans!

Fence the entire border

Secure our ports

Let more educated people into the country..not criminals and people with disease!

Most of the Mexicans did nothing for their home country. And most of them will absolutely do NOTHING for this country except to take advantage of it and its citizens.

What the heck is a spoxperson...isn't is Spokesperson?

Yes, CNN has lost all credibility with me....why not just come and say..."we are for Clinton"

The whole Hillary thing makes me sick too....is she trying to not remind people if she gets elected it is Bush,clinton, bush, clinton...

I thought we were a democratic republic...not a quasi-monarchy of two families.

CNN planted that question - and HRC knew it was coming - I am sorry I would have asked the Yucca question or at least say "CNN is making me ask probably the most inane question ever asked at a Presidential Debate, and I refuse to ask it"

She cannot handle tough questions, she is afraid of Fox News and you want to put her in charge of our national defense? She is not qualified and she will get a lot of us killed as a result. Please come to your senses, there are at least 10,000 women more qualified to be President than this weak, hide behind her skirt fraud

"The student should not have done what CNN wanted. You will always be slaves as long as you are willing to be slaves.

The MSM belongs to 7 Jews, why help the enemy of the human race?


Posted by DEW | November 16, 2007 1:44 PM "

What???
Bhaw-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!

DEW, ... did you say "7 Jews"???
He-he, snort! He-he!!!
Don't Taze me bro, ... but are you serious?!?
Wait!
Holy Hillary ya'll ... DEW is serious!!!

. . . Bahw-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!

I don't understand why someone would listen to CNN. Personally, I'd tell them, "Yes, I'll ask your approved question" and ask whatever the hell I wanted. If they stopped me or otherwise didn't like it, what could they do?

Can you say CNN? How about Clinton News Network?

As expected.

No Hillary. No Jewish support for this family. They (The Clinton's) sympathize with the terrorists. Face it. Giving the Palestinians what they want is not enough and bad enough. Fight "Her Thighness, Hillary Rotten Clinton". Stop her now.

Shalom.

I finished the debate disgusted with the way CNN handled it. I care about issues, not inter-candidate politics. CNN asked way too many questions about media-generated inter-candidate politics. The moderation of the event was unbalanced and focused on the poll leaders. Wolf is incompetent as a debate moderator; a copy reader does not automatically qualify someone as good debate moderator. Find a professional mediator next time. Also, the post-coverage on CNN did nothing but talk about the relative effectiveness of the public relations executed by the three leading candidates. The rest of the candidates were not mentioned, and there was no recap of the issues and the positions of the various candidates on those positions.

I want to watch a debate where there are professional mediators, questions focused on the issues, and reporters who focus on the issues and help viewers organization and outline the facts of the candidates positions. CNN is obviously unable to provide that.

I could give a rat's ass who Wolf Blitzer, or some other CNN flunky, thinks "won".

Forget gender. Forget race. Forget political party. The question is: which potential candidate stands for the United States of America? Which candidate stands for the Constitution? The law of the land? The answer as far as I can see is Ron Paul. He really is the only one who talks about the Constitution. He really is the only one who can try to lead us forward to the great nation we should be. Please study what he says. His message is straight and clear. That's what we need, now more than ever!

Am I the only one who caught this vile creature's comment...?

"The student should not have done what CNN wanted. You will always be slaves as long as you are willing to be slaves.

The MSM belongs to 7 Jews, why help the enemy of the human race?"


Posted by DEW | November 16, 2007 1:44 PM

Since when does The Atlantic endorse anti-simitic hate-speech??! Anti-semitism is a SIN! And even if you don't believe in God, it's just pure ignorant hatred. No wonder the donks are lsoing with every poll...

I dropped CNN as my second source for news after Drudge, mainly because they dropped their Science tab. Their slant has been disappointing, but it is now even more obvious that they do not cater to the intellectual crowd. The girl who asked the question is not a professional and cannot be expected to think of all the ramifications of her question at the spur of the moment. I applaud her for admitting the setup and realizing her decision was a mistake. I had no interest in the debate or those candidates, but quite frankly, I will look further to see - Was it diamonds or pearls?

Seems like most people don't understand what Yucca Mountain is about. When they host a debate, they throw a bone to the host city/state and touch on a local issue. Yucca Mountain is THE issue for Nevada. The Federal Government has been building a neculear waste repository there for years in total disregard for the people in this state. The repository will house nuclear waste generated throughout this country. Nevada does not have any nuclear power plants. The site they have chosen is unsafe due to earthquake and ground water problems. When scientists have proven the site is unsafe, they change the safety standards. How typical, build nuclear power plants all over the country without first having a place to store the waste. Onsite seems like a good choice, you made it, you keep it. Placing the waste in Yucca Mountain will result in widespread contamination of the Las Vegas area, the only question is when. The day may come when we have to block roads and trains to keep the waste out, and most of us are prepared for that. This is a huge issue for our state.

What do you expect from the Communist News Network?????

As if there were not enough reasons already - people, let's overcome this entire phoney establishment and get behind Ron Paul

As a Federal Sky Marshall, I will be on the lookout for Muslims who plan to attack this nation using our airplanes as missiles. I will sit in the front and I will start paying attention to any dark-skinned Muslim man and any liberals who get on my flight.

Libs. I'll be watching you.

Of course Blitzer is going to be nice to HRC. He doesn't want to be the next Vince Foster.
http://www.lizmichael.com/clintond.htm

You could have just said no, girl - but you wanted you 15 minutes of fame. Don't whine now.

A great man has often said, "beware the government-media complex". Open your eyes, listen and you will see the bias.

It is funny listening to people trash Fox News. People are so used to hearing the left handed spin from all the other networks that when they hear anything said or slightly favored to the right it freaks them out like they own the majority on opinion. Sorry folks at least 1/2 of the country think farther right than Fox News and most of them think Fox gets a little to the left for their taste. The silent majority is a reality. Only the college brain washed few on the left make up the minority left and can only win with smoke and mirrors.

(Heard in the wings: "Say, what time did you say we put the dog up on the pony?")

Marc,

I never said I was "forced" by CNN to ask the question. I was asked to memorize those two questions that were finally approved by CNN. I was asked to write both serious and "light-hearted questions" by CNN editorial producer. Since I was asked to have both of my questions memorized, my impression was that I would have the opportunity to ask both. I was supposed to ask the fun question first, then the serious question. But Wolf ended it there. That was it. Thank you.

Respectfully,
Maria Parra-Sandoval

ANYONE who thinks this wasn't a planted audience-
shame on you.
Obama and Edwards-----ALL the candidates, should refuse to appear at ANY of these set-up "debates"
So very sad.

Of course it's scripted.

Our "news" networks our owned by government contractors. Go look it up. Follow the money.

Both Hilary and Guliani's campaign managers were on the Blackwater payroll until just recently. Romney's finance guy was Blackwater too.

Do you really think either one of them will end the war when the campaigns on both sides are being run by the same mercenary company?

Nick: "Sorry folks at least 1/2 of the country think farther right than Fox News and most of them think Fox gets a little to the left for their taste. The silent majority is a reality."

Yeah, that's why you Republicans won such an overwhelming victory in 2006.

Pearl Necklace. Pearl Necklace. Pearl Necklace. Go, Billy. Go Go Go........ Go Billy.
This is a diversity rap. Rap it when you read it. Rapit when you feelizzle it.

Hillary is so sexy in her Pant Suits....
No wonder Bill digs her...

Harry Reid's son is chair of Hillary's campaign in Nevada and the Nevada political establishment has lined up behind her. They controlled the seating at the debate and they stacked it for her. Simple as that.

Harry Reid and Sons. Go back to live in Searchlight NV. Where you belong !!!

It was painfully obvious that the fix was in. The Clinton machine probably has dirt on all her major opponents and for the most part they just stood up there passively looking shamed, speechless and at a loss for words like somone had a knife to their throats. Only Clinton appeared to still have any interest in being president. Blitzer was a much better butler than a newsman, seving up softballs for Clinton and protecting her by cutting off Obama and Edwards. The debate was shuch a sham, they should have had a credits line "tonight's debate produced and filtered by Clinton campaign staff."

Almost every single comment on this article has restored my faith in humanity. Almost every single one.
Thanks you all, I will sleep well tonight.

Why do you think they call it the Clinton News Network. This debate was a farce. It was so obviously choreographed to make Hilliary look good. In fact many talk shows predicted the press response the day before the so called debate. Why no HARD questions? How can Hilliary be in charge yet say she did not know about pre-approved questions? How come no one ask her if it was un-ethical to accept money from the people her husband pardoned? Hillary would not last two seconds with a un-scripted question.

The media is biased. We see the media on the left pushing Hillary and on the right pushing Guiliani, Romney or Huckabee. While I agree with some of what Ron Paul says, I will support Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo in the Primary.
If we do not seal that border soon, we are heading toward a North American Union. The issue for Nevada may be Yucca Mountain, but for Texas it is the Trans Texas Corridor, aka, NAFTA Super Highway coming out of Mexico.

CNN A Pro Clinton slant? Well their not known as The Clinton News Network for nothing!
Look at The way they treated King Bill In the 90's. they practically rolled out the red carpet for him.
Do you expect them to allow tough questions to be asked of the queen? Everybody knows Wolf Blitzer Is in Love with the Clintons Commies stick together!

The debate was fake. CNN failed.
Questions was fixed.

The debate was fake. CNN failed.
Questions was fixed.

It ought to disturb everyone that the Clinton machine is actively trying to control media outlets in such an obvious and troubling fashion...and it ought to a huge disgrace for CNN that they're allowing Hillary's campaign to browbeat them into being Clinton lapdogs.

If she actually gets elected president, you'll get even more of the same type of media control. Double-plus ungood, America...

I couldn't stomach watching the so called debate I'm so glad I didn't waste my time. I did get a giggle out of the post though.

The available tickets were distributed equally between all the candidates. Some students and faculty also received tickets.

It's really brilliant. And evil.

Not only did the diamonds and pearls question make Hillary seem more feminine which is what she needs right now. But the campaign gets to get people to attack it as a gender question as if it were a negative even though it's positive for her campaign to be seen as more of a woman.

my head's going to explode.

CNN has had their adgenda driven by the left for years and their rigged pro-Hillary debate is the latest example.

Wolf batters the other Dems while asking Madame Socialist cream puff questions!

To rig questions in an effort to make Hillary more feminine is a loosing cause. I was present several years ago when she showed herself to be a mean-spirited, strident and totally masculine individual screaming statments in a very Hitlerian manner - minus the dark moustache of course!

It would be interesting to see a true demographic of the CNN audience and compare it to the Hillary crowd.

Hillary needs to plant the American flags, and let the questions fall where they may- not let the flags fall and plant the questions as she seems to do

B posted: "Hillary supporters did the booing. It was embarrassing."

No, people are just sick and tired of negative politics. Most just want answers not attacks. What's wrong with wanting a candidate to just answer the questions on the issues?

Obama and Edwards had an agenda before the Philadelphia debate to bash Hillary no matter what she said. Some people here just wanted to see her go down, and she didn't.

It was nice to get to hear what Biden, Richardson and Dodd had to say...the other dude? Well I never can understand what he actually is saying. He just answers every question with something about the war irregardless of whether it fits or not.

Nobody forced the girl to ask any questions at all. The fact that students showed up at all to a rigged event only goes to show that the world they are getting is the world they deserve.

Like husband, like wife.

listened for one plus minutes to see the rigging and had to go to restroom to regurgitate'HRC' was spinning or dancing with her partner of choice for the evening 'WB'. Sad state of affairs to "call this a debate". A real "Monkey and squirrel" show as what I saw. One chasing after the other nut and liking it. Stand by America, If this is the best that MSM can produce, we are sickened for the worst.

With the way the moderator turned from wolf to lamb & the reports of stacking softball questions with no follow up clarifications in favor of "Her Thighness, Queen Shrillary" is there any doubt that CNN really is an acronym for Clinton's Nominating Network?

Get used to it. CNN is firmly a leftist news organization which promotes Hillary Clinton. Wolf Blitzer is a sycophant that would never ask Hillary a meaningful question or expect a meaningful answer; he is a disgrace to the newsworld--certainly not an Edward R. Murrow or Walther Cronkite. After a debate you should be able to say something meaningful about the debaters' remarks. In Hillary's case it was blather, meaningless drivel, and more of the same. You know nothing about this woman other than the fact she would undergo waterboarding if it would help her get the nominatin.

What do you expect from CNN? If you expect the truth, you are really screwed up.

ONE THING YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER IS THAT HILLARY HAD THOSE F.B.I. RECORDS. SHE WOULD ONLY NEED TO FIND OUT THINGS ABOUT HER FRIENDS. YOU CAN BET THE FARM ON HER USING THAT INFO TO DESTROY WHO EVER SHE NEEDS TO. THE KING IS DEAD SO LONG LIVE THE QUEEN. SHE SURE THINKS SHE IS, JUST ASK BILL.

If I knew I had one shot, I wouldn't waste it on such a spurious question. I'd agree to do it, but then start with, "CNN said they would only let me speak if I asked a frivilous question, so I would like to ask a serious one instead...."

She doesn't work for CNN, and if they had censored her mid sentence, it would make CNN look bad, not her. Besides, what are they going to do, physically accost her? Liusa could have written about the censorship afterward and call it a protest to defend her integrity instead of pretending to be the victim.

She dropped the ball by giving in to CNN. She gave up her credibility, so she shouldn't whine about those who question her actions.

al qaeda and the like are just waiting for a dem to get in office. then we will see carnage that makes 911 look like to school girls fighting on youtube. and with the way they regard women over there, if its hillary, its going to be in spades.
im sure they have donated to her campaign.

So, the questions asked were screened and approved in advance....interesting. I wonder if the praise stories telling us how well Hillary rebounded were also written and approved in advance of the debate. It's becomimg more and more obvious that the system is corrupt and that the voters have no true say in our government. It's time to throw everyone out and elect a new set of representatives. We have the power, the only question is do we have the courage to take back our country from the current gaggle of self serving politicians.

This girl suggests that, "if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the...New York Times..." Fortunately she suggests "other independent sources," but it still shows her wacked-out mindset if she still considers the NYT a reliable news source.

Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that "there's not a dime's worth of difference between" Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, banning books like "America Deceived' from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason.
Support Dr. Ron Paul and save this great nation.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
America Deceived (book)

I am a conservative. Voted for Bush. Not too thrilled about his performance.
To me, Biden had some courage. I would feel comfortable with him as President. But he will not get the nomination because he has no "diverse" qualities....which has been in vogue with the democrats for sometime now. Sad really......
CNN and this debate was a farce.

It's not "the media's" fault. It's CNN's fault. They went from a great news station to total BS after Turner sold them. CNN is garbage.

This proves that this debate was nothing but a "dog and pony show". The media is for sale here.

After the Civil War, slavery was permitted to continue via "Right to Work" laws, which, to people in my position, mean: "Right to Enslave your Subordinates."

I'd like to know when these Right to Work laws will finally be overturned. And which candidate is willing to overturn them?

While some my colleagues south of the Mason-Dixon line seem to appreciate Right to Work laws--franchise owners, mostly--more and more don't, and I'm definitely one of them. Right to Work laws inhibit if not cripple "Trickle Down Economics," which were a farce to begin with, and Ronny Boy knew it.

If "Dixie" (ugh!) overturned Right to Work laws, sure, it would affect some businesses, some would even go out of business, but ultimately it would help those businesses willing to change to thrive--and the entire economy would strengthen as a result.

Again, which candidates support overturning Right to Work laws?

CNN disgraceful as usual. I thought the writers were on strike? Who's scripting these shows?

I propose a new debate format.

All debates to held on PBS since the tax payers foot the bill.

Democrats get Ann Coulter to moderate and an audience of Rassmusen certified likely republican voters.

Republicans get Susan Estrich to moderate and an audience of Zogby certified likely democrat voters.

Open mike questions, no pre-screening. Moderator does all follow-ups.

I'd pay to watch that on pay-per-view!

Gary Denton wrote at November 16, 2007 1:06 PM:

"Wow, on top of the outright conservative Republican bias of Wolf Blitzer and John Roberts on display this really takes the cake. Let's close with a stupid question so we can really be just like FOX NEWS."


Haha. What drugs are you taking? Now, Wolf and CNN are Republican? Oh, good grief, you liberals are really up the creek of kooksville. Good luck, you're gonna need it. Don't forget a dig on Fox news, oops, there ya go, You got it in. Good sheep.

But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question."

How many liberals can post here in a day? LOTS!!! How many liberals are angry, upset, anxious, frustrated by the actions of their once beloved press? LOTS!!! How many liberals were afraid to debate with Foxnews? LOTS!!!! How many liberals are gonna screw up their only chance to get back into the White House for decades to come? LOTS!!!

You're a sorry lot.

A more fitting question for Dilliry would have been "Boxers or briefs?" Nice going CNN, you are worse than a joke.

Posted by Butch | November 17, 2007 8:24 AM

"CNN disgraceful as usual. I thought the writers were on strike? Who's scripting these shows?
I propose a new debate format.
All debates to held on PBS since the tax payers foot the bill.
Democrats get Ann Coulter to moderate and an audience of Rassmusen certified likely republican voters.
Republicans get Susan Estrich to moderate and an audience of Zogby certified likely democrat voters.
Open mike questions, no pre-screening. Moderator does all follow-ups.
I'd pay to watch that on pay-per-view!"

BEST POST YET!!!!!!

Maria, you ignorant slut!

I don't know who panders more. CNN to Clinton? Clinton to the latest poll data?

Both lack integrity.

If she thinks the NY Times is an independent news source, the diamond and pearls question was above her intellect. The audience was obviously stacked, and the imbeciles at UNLV proved why they are a third tier university.


anyone with an ounce of sense who's ever watched cnn for more than 20 minutes knows where they stand. It's hilarious hearing all the obama worshippers suddenly crying 'foul' at a practice they've approved through the entire bush presidency

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate.

This was actually a brilliant satire by Maria.

Here is the inside "joke":
Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

If we are going to elect a woman merely to show the rest of the world how "progressive" we are, could we at least wait until we have one that is man enough for the job?

The Clintons have hijacked the Democratic party. I'm saving my vote 2012

Well, Hillary did say her staff would not plant any more questions. She didn't say CNN won't plant the questions for the Hillary campaign. We all know CNN shills for Hillary.

http://politicalnighttrain.wordpress.com/

This farce was NOT a "debate"!!

A "debate" requires that ALL participants speak on the SAME TOPIC!! With the media picking and choosing...not letting some candidates speak on certain topics...not giving candidates equal time...and substituting silly questions for serious ones...all this is is just another 3rd-rate show put on by the Clinton News Network. It has all of the same gravity and national importance as "Scrubs" (and not as much as "The Simpsons").

"So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source."
EVERYBODY knows that CNN is a shill for the Libs but to pick the NYTs as a reliable source? They are proven liars.

"So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source."
EVERYBODY knows that CNN is a shill for the Libs but to pick the NYTs as a reliable source? They are proven liars.

Todays MSM. Why would we be surprised about this?

"...and what was to stop her from asking her original question when the mike was in front of her? coward..."


Don't Tase Me Bro!

What was to stop her from asking her real question, once she was at the microphone?

Maybe, as the CNN op said, it was that her question was already asked. Or maybe, it was the possibility of getting tasered.

Don't Tase me, bro! (Especially not in Vancouver).

CNN and Blitzer were Hillary's operatives.

What about the question of the night about illegal immigration...the set up was let Obama and Edwards ramble on then Wolf says "This is simply a yes or no answer" and calls on HC and she says "no" after saying yes and every other variation of yes in every other forum, and Blitzer doesn't ask for an explanation.

WOW! What a set-up.

As a long-time member of a well-known public speaking club (hint: begins with a "T"), I have often been asked such "Pearls vs. Diamonds" questions during off-the-cuff speaking practice. How the speaker answers is most revealing. What if Hillary had responded by turning to Barack Obama and asked, "Fried chicken or watermelon?" Or perhaps answered, "It's not a choice of pearls or diamonds anymore. With the devaluation of the dollar, it's cubic zirconias or plastic for the American People." Either response would have brought down the house.

Ask yourself what Hillary's response - "Both." - revealed about her. I'll guarantee that there's plenty to learn.

HRC was even 'on the fence' about the question of Diamonds & Pearls.......wouldn't want to offend someone

isn't anyone worried about bill being back in the white house with the staff

yea, go to the nyt for the real news.....LOL!
the libs, cnn and the candidates, will of course get yet another pass.....why, because they're dems, OF COURSE!

"So why did she go along with CNN's agenda?"


Come on those of you who are giving her a hard time. Have you not read the book about what they did to Kathleen Willy? Or to Vince Foster?

The Clintons are part of the new mafia cross them and die.

Maria Luisa needs to understand that because she is a liberal, she is compelled to view her life through the prism of victim-hood.

Maria writes, "But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question." Really? Who should get the blame for asking one of the dumbest questions in the history of political discourse: CNN or Maria Luisa?

The truth is, Maria could have declined to ask a question, she could have asked her original question, or she could have exposed the hypocrisy of the evening by telling the world that the questions were all planted for maximum media entertainment.

Instead, Maria chose to comply with CNN's request to ask the pearls or diamonds questions. Maria does so and then claims that she is not to blame.

Certainly CNN lacks integrity for not making it clear to its viewers that it had already cherry-picked and pre-approved all questions from the audience.

But Maria certainly didn't have to go along with it. I don't see that Maria should get a pass on this one. If she didn't think that was the question she wanted to ask, then she should have had the moral courage and personal integrity not to ask it.

We all make choices as we live our lives. Maria chose to do what CNN requested. Then she claims she has no culpability by implying that CNN somehow forced her to make a fool of herself.

Liberals! Can't laugh with them; can't laugh without them.

What's with the antisemitic crap on this blog? Whether you like it or not, the Jews are God's people and Israel His nation (and no, I'm not Jewish).

Pathetic debate. Why bother having other candidates on stage is they are not allowed to participate? Just have the main ones and be real.
How can anyone present substantive views in such a brief, allotted time? It's just typical of what much of this nation has become, led enthusiastically by all forms of media - superficial.

Luisa wrote: "Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That's what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality."

Well said Luisa. We have drifted from being a republic and our leaders and the media continue telling us that we are a democracy. A democracy is mob rule, and he who controls the mob, rules. Not only is the media scripted, but so are our elections and actions (as a nation). This whole world existence is nothing but smoke and mirrors. Oh well though, so long as people can watch football and drink beer, that's all that matters right?

The Las Vegas Sun's blog posted this insight about Maria Parra-Sandoval moments after she asked her debate question. She has a fascinating history. Look for the item, "The young woman with the last queston." A follow-up story about her is in Saturday's Las Vegas Sun.


http://blogs.lasvegassun.com/politics/2007/11/15/the-young-woman-with-the-last-question/

Both Republican and Democrat candidates breathe a sign of relief after every one of these pathetic debates because they never have to give a specific answer or defend their records in detail. Diamonds or Pearls? Boxers or Briefs? Lohan or Spears? We are doomed.

The Democratic Party and it's media cheerleaders are all crooked and corrupt.You can't believe any of them ever!!

I am encouraged and pleased to read that the comments of those writing responses to the debate on CNN are intelligent, observant and correct in their assessment of the news media in general and of the debate moderators in particular. Our news media is failing us but what bothered me the most is that I didn't think so many people realized it. They do.

We will not be fooled afterall.

This is way too easy. If you want a job, vote Republican; they create jobs! If you want to cry, whine, strike, picket, sue and put companies out of business, vote democrat. Democrats create nothing but hate and distain for anyone that works hard for a living. We owe them a living, don't ya know...

CNN = Clinton News Network

I've been a CNN devotee for years, but they really dropped the ball on this one. Except on FOX, it's been a staple of debates for years that the audience is asked to be quiet so the rest of the country can actually hear the candidates, not a pep rally. How could CNN forget this rule? Other than that, the first half of the debate was actually in a nice format. Unfortunately, it was influenced, and ultimately ruined, by the audience. The second half of the debate was a joke, and the pre-screened questions make it even worse.

Well, after this CNN pro Hillary show now you know why the Demorats weren't willing to have a debate on FOX where real questions would be asked.

the only canidits that have it wright r ron paul and dennis k.and u cant hide the truth.hillery clintin is two faced.and so r the rest of them liers you want something diffrent.you need one indepedent,dem and rep. in the wh to keep the crooks honest.

Stalinism is an ugly, dark and evil thing. Who better to bring it about in America than ugly, dark and evil Hillary Clinton and her salvish minions at CNN? By the third year of her everlasting presidency what she, Carville and the media is doing now will look like a pre-school picnic.

CNN and the Democrat Candidates are both shit. It is clear that CNN is biased towards Clinton and that they are also so pro-Democrat that they cannot try to look un-biased.
This country is in real trouble judging by the questions, candidates, media and members of the Democrat party. All a bunch of losers who have no answers but to cause more problems for the rest of us.

If anyone thinks they are getting an honest debate out of these clowns, they are blind. The woman who asked the question about IRAQ claiming her son was killed was no stranger. She is an activist. I would have loved to see questions asked about Hillary's funny Asian money and her behind the scenes actions during Bill's time in the WH. I'd like to have questions asked of the "smartest woman on earth" about her poor memory during her own testimonies while Bill was in office and after when her brothers bought pardons and she "had no idea" and was "so disappointed." Yeah, right! I'd like to hear straight answers about the mysterious Rose Law Firm billings showing up where they did and why they kept the police out while Hillary swept his office clean.

No one put a gun to her head--she could have said anything she wanted. It's one thing to blame Big Media, but are students of today so worried about gold stars that they can't act for themselves? Why didn't she just tell the CNN flunkies to go F---themselves?

the power of suggestion does work on everyone.the more u lie the less people trust u

the power of suggestion doesnt work on everyone.the more u lie the less people trust u

if we keep the up my grand kids and yours r in deep big trouble.i for one am sick and tired of being lyed to.

It was George Bush's fault!

As a card-carrying Reagan Republican, I continue to marvel at the Clinton's ability to rebound from any and every setback. Whether it's a poor debate performance or getting caught with one's pants down, Bill and Hill know how to survive. Hillary will be the Democratic candidate in '08. It will take a Herculean effort by Republicans to keep her out of the White House.

Why is everyone so shocked by this?

After all - it's CNN!!!

Listen, all you conservatives need to take a good long look at the Bush administration and just shut up and go home.

Both parties are full of it. Time for some new ones.

Well then....if Hillary is the best example of a woman president that America can come up with, it doesn't bode well. She exemplifies all of the worst stereotypes of women that have kept one from being elected in the first place. Margaret Thatcher she's not. The only thing worse was watching Wolf Blitzer withering under the threats from her thug campaign staff and soft balling her all night. An embarassment all the way around.

Welcome to the world of Hillary Clinton. Her handlers are only too happy to keep her in a "safe zone"........We can only hope they will see the light and save us from these power hungry politicians.

I'm suprised she didn't ask the "Boxers or briefs" question. I would have liked to have heard Hil's answer to that one.

Don't you right wing nuts have anything better to do than whine all time. You better start showing some respect for the next president of the United States!

Butch has the right idea for a debate, unfortunately no politician - especially the Dems - would do it. They will not even debate on Fox News. It is clear the the MSM is biased to the Dems, and it is a death blow to our country that Hillary is the choice. With the opening of China trade (campaign funds help)and NAFTA during hubby's reign there will be even more acceleration.

I watched about the first 45 minutes of the debate before the nauseousness started to overwhelm me. CNN could not run the debate correctly and I turned it off. Lou Dobbs needs to be the moderator, but that will not happen in the Clinton News Network. All these Democratic Debates are is ways to get free air time and more MSM reporting.

From what I hear Maria could have shown some backbone by coming up with an alternative question instead of her feel good question, but in truth it doesn't matter. HRC has been anointed and let no one stand in her way.

They had a few seconds left and went for a silly question...one this girl/woman wrote herself. Even some dude on Fox "News" defended it. He other question was ALREADY asked. It was actually pretty much a sexist question for Hillary anyway, although she laughed it off.

She didn't HAVE to ask the question and she herself said it was "silly".

Most of the bashing here does come because everything is linked to the Drudgereport...a group who hate Democrats and love people like O'Reilly, Limbaugh and Coulter. Such bullsh*t.

Well once again the driveby media was easy on HRC. She claims they sling mud at her. All she needs to do is answer the questions they give her. Thank God for Tim Russert who had the balls and was not frightened of the Clinton machine! HRC needs to be asked tough questions. Those democrats are so frightened of Fox news, it is sad. They know Fox news will ask questions the drivebys won't ask. With the Clintons, if you ask them tough questions, they cry like babies."They can fool some of the people..." In my opinion, the Clintons have been the worst thing that ever happened to this country. They have divided this country so much. I think he descecrated the White House Oval Office so badly. It wasn't what he did, it was where he did it. Not only that, he did it while on the job for the American people. It will be so disgusting to have those two in the White House again. I would vote for any other Democrat if it meant HRC would not be the nominee.

Bravo to Maria Luisa for telling the truth. That is what a real American does, stands up for her/his convictions and tells the truth.
Anyone who didn't sleep through the Las Vegas DNC Candidate debate (aka: The Hillary Clinton Road Show), knew very well that CNN stacked the deck Vegas style in Hillary's favor. CNN is without a doubt, the Clinton News Network and not a journalistic entity but a political agenda company. Maria can walk with her head up knowing she did the right thing, unlike CNN and the DNC. Maria, don't even bother worrying about your email 'assailants', they are nothing but political hacks working for Hillary.

So this is what Clinton feminism looks like. What a complete disgrace and mockery of democracy. Our nation deserves much, much better. Every day, more and more, I believe deeper and deeper in Dr. Ron Paul. He is the only REAL person out there willing to do what it takes to get this country back on track.

Well once again the driveby media was easy on HRC. She claims they sling mud at her. All she needs to do is answer the questions they give her. Thank God for Tim Russert who had the balls and was not frightened of the Clinton machine! HRC needs to be asked tough questions. Those democrats are so frightened of Fox news, it is sad. They know Fox news will ask questions the drivebys won't ask. With the Clintons, if you ask them tough questions, they cry like babies."They can fool some of the people..." In my opinion, the Clintons have been the worst thing that ever happened to this country. They have divided this country so much. I think he descecrated the White House Oval Office so badly. It wasn't what he did, it was where he did it. Not only that, he did it while on the job for the American people. It will be so disgusting to have those two in the White House again. I would vote for any other Democrat if it meant HRC would not be the nominee.

Lets not forget that news has been combined with entertainment. To some, this was an entertaining question. Much of Hillary's campaign has been designed around the concept. Hillary is the Celebrity Senator from New York, having taken over that slot from Daniel Patrick Moynihan, although he had the added benefit of being a genuine Statesmen.

There's a lessen here for questioners at future debates: If you're going to be led around by the nose, why bother? What's the point, besides feeling a part of the "process"? And in Hillary's case, you are simply a tool that she uses to claw her way to nanny-state power over all of us. Your ideas mean nothing to her. She has all she can deal with just figuring out how to put her own "million ideas" into effect.

Please - I would have liked to hear George just say one intelligent thing in his entire presidency.

Why doesn't CNN get real and dig up the footage from the Clinton's "welcoming" the Bushs to the Whitehouse? It was a cold rainy day. Hillary was standing at the Whitehouse door shaking hands with the incoming people. In between people she was wiping her nose with her bare hand. That is Hillary's true take on other, lesser people.

HILLARY'S RIGHT......YOU GUYS ARE "GANGING UP" ON HER. SHE'S RUNNING TO TELL BILL TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.......IF SHE CAN FIND WHICH BEDROOM HE'S IN.

Wow,

How on Earth does a news organisation FORCE a student to ask a specific question. I'm wondering if its a gun to the head or just simply kidnapping her family.

When did students begin to simply obey orders, instead of learning and having the balls (so to speak) to actually ask their own questions.

Does it matter? Queen Hillary wouldn't look good in pearls or diamonds.

the democratic process, imo is a facade. corporations run the process for both sides.
how can you ask a very important question of
"how will you, if elected, handle the increasing instability in the middle east?" then have the moderator change the question for you and ask "how will you handle the inceasing gas prices?" that's not the question, then the canidate (puppet) only has 15 seconds to answer.
is it so hard to do what is best for America?
finger pointing, blame game and dodging of the truth is what are all about politicans.
we as Americans should demand more results and less B.S.
planted questions, diamonds and pearl questions, answers so conviluted that you don't even know what you asked, celebrity distractions are plain insults to the collective intelligence.
Moulder said it best..."the truth is out there"

CNN?

Try

Clinton
News
Network

At least FOX would have asked the hard questions.
Typical Clinton machine bulldozer effort, win at all costs type crap.
Ron Paul looks better every day ......

Was somebody holding a gun to this lady's head? Is that why she didn't ask the question she wanted to ask? Nobody was forcing her to do anything. She did it on her own.

Try
NBC
National Broadcasting for the Clintons

ABC
American " " "

CBS
Clinton Broadcasting System

Now the real question is, "Hillary, how do you get stains our of your husband's girlfriends dresses?" The woman cannot run her marriage, how will she run the country?

I think it's funny when Hillary talks of her "experience." What experience? I'm taking a deeper look at Joe Biden. Foriegn policy will be critical in this next administration. Biden seems the only qualified candidate with detailed, though out strategies. Not a shock the Clinton News Network cut him off every time he began to engage the audience.

Many great comments here, except the disgusting anti-Semitic ravings of a few loons.

Maria's response (11/17 at 12:54AM) in these comments clears up why she asked the frivilous question -- she thought she would then be given the opportunity to ask her serious question.

So, we can fault her for being a bit naive, but not for backing down. She's an earnest college student, folks! Don't knock her for being out-manuvered in a split second. She was manipulated by "pros" with an agenda. And it's a good thing she has now exposed the CNN game.

The really sad thing about all of this is that CNN so completely caved by openly and demonstrably manipulating this "debate." And Wolfy surrendered any shred of honor he may have once had. He could have asked something like these questions.

From now on, shame on anyone who now can't see the forest for the plants -- even the manipulated ones!

P.S. Our vote for best post so far . . .

(Heard in the wings: "Say, what time did you say we put the dog up on the pony?")

Posted by Billy Beck | November 17, 2007 12:39 AM

That says it all!

Let's face it. They did not get a lot of viewership based on the candidates, Blitzer's questions (or requests might be a better word), or for the fact that is was on CNN. Millions of people watched because they wanted to see if Hillary would screw up again. With 2 weeks worth of advice on questions she knew would come up, it would have been devestation for her. Other than that, no one really cared about the debate. Oh by the way Dennis. They are "illegal" aliens as they came over here illegaly. Why do they even let this putz up on the stage anymore!

Jackie Rawlings wrote above, "Our country is in the worse shape it's ever been in with the weak lying President who American picked twice..." in her rant against the GOP.

I am really confused... I didn't know Bill Clinton was ever a member in the GOP?

Hillary Clinton is a leftist? Give me a fucking break. That's like calling Rudy Giuliani Jerry Falwell. Shit doesn't wash.

Don't you right wing nuts have anything better to do than whine all time. You better start showing some respect for the next president of the United States!


Posted by Pat

Tell you what Pat. If this woman EVER becomes President we'll take YOUR lead and treat her with the same respect you have show the current President. Surely you won't have a problem with that right?

If the can force a girl to ask a question then they should only sak men to sak them. No one would ever make me ask a question i did not want to. What did they hold a gun to your head you stupid ass.

if cnn. can force a girl to ask a questin then they should stay in the kitchen where they belong. No one would ever force me to ask a question.She is a stupid a hole.

i agree with disappointed. she could have asked the "yucca" question anyway. maria luisa is a perfect example of the mind-controlled automatons produced by our educational system. pathetic...

The Clintons were responsible for the most heinous, brutal violation of civil, human and constitutional rights in this nation's history. Check out what they did to innocent women and children at Waco in 1993: http://www.wizardsofaz.com/waco/waco2.html
Clinton should be asked how she could have allowed this to happen and if she would allow it to happen again if, God help us, she becomes president. She should also be asked why she opposes torture on terrorists but did not oppose it's use on her own innocent citizens. Don't look for anyone in the leftstream Democrat media to go anywhere near this. But I will.

All this shows the fatal flaw of the Clintons. They believe that it is more important for them to be elected than for Democracy to flourish. Lying and manipulating reality is ok because their retention of power is more important than anything else. If they were to show some respect to the voting public they might be attractive. As it sits, they seem dangerous to me.

This girl is a Truman scholar & she think the New York Times is an independent source. WOW! She obviously attended a government school. Where else would anybody learn that the NY Times is an objective newspaper.

I'm as Conservative as they come. So while watching the debate with totally objective eyes, I could not for the life of me figure out what qualities HRC has to be President. She touts her "35" years but as what? I see the ads stating how she "fights" for all of us. Whenever I ask anyone why they are voting for her they cannot come up with a real reason. Ever. I have come to the conclusion that people who vote for her are really voting for "them" meaning Bill and Hillary.

But, as I stated above, I did watch this debate with objectivity first and foremost.

I saw Bill Richardson basically there for a job interview for Hillary.

I saw John Edwards as a man knowing he is going down but, won't be quiet about it.

I saw Barack Obama as the rookie he is. After the past 2 weeks, you'd think he'd have THE answer ready about illegals getting drivers licenses.

I saw Dennis Kucinich pander to the extreme far left and get his goosebumps by shouting "Impeachment!". Yawn.

But......I saw Joe Biden as the guy who won hands down. I have never been, nor will be, a fan of his. However, he was sharp, articulate, ready for anything without a hint of hesitancy. To me, he looked as though he could be (cringe) President.

But Hillary? I don't don't know what troubles me most. The fact that CNN and the audience were stacked with HRC defenders or that people can't see the obvious. HRC's "team" is bullying and strong-arming the media. Planting questions. Refusing interviews. It's as though she's saying "Just give me the Crown and stop annoying me with questions!"

God help us all if she gets in. God help the USA.

Elsie, Lou Dobbs a xenophobe because he wants a secure border and supports legal immagration? Elsie you're a lair, traitor and racist for favoring a foreign race over America and Americans. your a fool that will destroy us.

No wonder some call CNN "Clinton News Network." She has no record and the one she does have is "hidden" and will never see the light of day. Has everyone "forgotten" their tactics or are we so hardened that do not matter anymore. Wake up people. Someone please ask her, What have you done? Not , what is she going to do?

This kind of thing should not suprise anyone; this is how the left operates.

Luisa is supposedly a smart and intelligent person; she simply failed to use her imagination. Why did she accept the conformist mindset and adhere to the CNN-imposed limits? If it were me, I would have simply gone off-script and asked another important question, and one which was not on the list of pre-approved (superficial) questions or topics. What could they have done to her, cut off her mike in the middle of a live broadcast? Remove her from the audience on live TV? Have her detained or arrested? Be banned from appearing on CNN ever again (big deal). Opportunities like that don't present themselves very often, and she blew it through lack of imagination.

To goodwynn:

You're right - it was George Bush's fault!

I think they should ask Mrs. Clinton, "If your husband cannot be loyal to you, why should the American voters?"

My question to Hillary is: What is your favorite cigar? Is it the same brand that Monica enjoys? Do you prefer the blunt end first or the tapered?

Call Lou Dobbs a xenophobe for having a different opinion than you on "illegal" imigration? Why didn't you pull out the old canard Racist, while you're at it.

Stupid. This is why we can't engage in serious public discussions in the country. Our Nation's forefathers are spinning in their graves.

I have never seen a worse debate. I have judged high school speech and debate and have see better performances from freshmen students. The "diamonds and pearls" question says all you need to know about Hillary.

How anyone could have watched this debate and not come away with the knowledge that this was the Hillary Show,is just drinking the kool-aid. When all of our politicians can get away with pre-scripted answers, that are not really answers at all, we as a country are in deep trouble. The talking point answers we were given by all of the canidates leave us not knowing their true positions on any of the major issues. Maybe someone in the press will grow some, , and pin all of the canidates down on their positions on the major issues that are facing our great nation.

Hey, Jackie Rawlings. You wrote:

Great and interesting comments about the Debate from this site. We should be glad that the questions of Diamonds or Pearls wasn't asked to one of the male candidates. Sometimes it's hard for people to see a qualified strong woman who can do as other female Presidents around the world do and that is stand up for truth. Americans honor their Mothers and hold them to the highest esteem but would want an idiot, drunk, druggie who steals and lies for President of the United States. Our country is in the worse shape it's ever been in with the weak lying President who American picked twice. If Hillary is attacked because she's a woman but best qualifed what do you think will happen if Senator Obama is picked. Look for the racist to come out strong and maybe bring back the real history of America and use RACE as their tool. We have seen the GOP use God and it worked next will be Women/Race to get another corrupt GOP in office. The Supreme Court is lined up to do what they are told. The GOP doesn't have to worry about the only Black Justice anymore. Yes Justice Thomas is totally insane and see DEAD PEOPLE. The rest of the 5 paid Justices are just looking for more oil shares to do as their told.

I respect your views, but please express them using correct grammar. Your commentary is negated by your murder of the English language. How 'bout this:

Great and interesting comments about the Debate from this site [sentence fragment]. We should be glad that the questions [question - subject/verb disagreement] of Diamonds or Pearls wasn't [subject/verb disagreement] asked to one of the male candidates. Sometimes it's hard for people to see a qualified strong woman who can do as other female Presidents around the world do and that is [to] stand up for truth. [non-grammatical comment: the reader must assume from this convoluted sentence that Hillary "stands up for the truth." Well...] Americans honor their Mothers and hold them to [sic; "in"] the highest esteem [,] but [would want] [sic; "elected"] an idiot, drunk, druggie who steals and lies for President of the United States. [Pardon another non grammatical comment. But for your commentary to be taken seriously, you should at least tell the truth. Bush doesn't drink alchohol or take drugs] Our country is in the worse [sic] shape it's ever been in with the weak lying President who American [sic; America or Americans] picked twice. If Hillary is attacked because she's a woman [,] but best qualifed what do you think will happen if Senator Obama is picked. [questions get a question mark (?), not a period] Look for the racist [subject/verb disagreement] to come out strong and maybe bring back the real history of America and use RACE as their [subject/verb disagreement] tool. We have seen the GOP use God and it worked [.] n[N]ext will be Women/Race to get another corrupt GOP [candidate; GOP is a political party] in office. The Supreme Court [justices] is [are] lined up to do what they are told. The GOP doesn't have to worry about the only Black Justice anymore. Yes Justice Thomas is totally insane and see [maybe you mean "he be seein'"] DEAD PEOPLE. [Ask yourself why you automatically brand a Black conservative as "insane." In case you don't know, that would be racism] The rest of the 5 paid Justices are just looking for more oil shares to do as their [sic; that would be "they are"] told. [the reader must assume from this statement that 4 of the justices are not "paid"] [It is illegal for any public servant to own anything that may present a conflict of interest, unless your name is Clinton. Anyone named "Clinton" is exempt from laws related to ethics.]

While you are devising your reply to eloquently brand me as a racist, maybe you should read your own racist/sexist diatribe. Yea. Us poor dumb conservatives are automatically racists. But you should be enlightened enough to understand that 99% of real racists are those who accuse others of racism. Uh - Duke Lacrosse and Jesse Jackson come to mind?

As a poor dumb white male once put it:

"Methinks thou dost protest too much."

Curiosity compels me to ask: What would have happened if the young lady had ignored CNN handlers and blurted out her own question? Would CNN have tasered her and dragged her out?

To Jackie Rawlings: What a good little kool-aid drinker you are. I used to be a self-loathing, guilt ridden white female, just like you. I blamed everything on racists and sexists.

Thankfully, I grew up. I learned more, read, studied, researched, to see about race and gender issues in the US. You are a liar, but don't even realize it. You will vote for a corrupt socialist, because she is a woman. You will sing the praises of Obama, despite him attending a madrassa for 3 years as a child; and despite him attending a SEGREGATED church.

Yes Jackie, whitey is not allowed to attend Obama's church. Research it your self if you don't believe me. Did you know that "Senator" Byrd (WV) was the former Grand Kleagle of the KKK?

As for Hil, she allowed her POS hubby to stick his member into any female, with no repurcussions- this included women who did NOT want to be touched by the Perv. Research Kathleen Willey, Juanita Brodderick, Paula Jones. Hil is a feminist? No, she protects her sex addict's (Husband's) bad behavior. Hil makes women look bad.

As for the lame planted question: how utterly embarrassing for that college student, the audience, and Hildabeast. Diamonds or pearls? Yes, great question for a presidential candidate. I expect nothing less from the Clintonista News Network.

So far, this has been the worst debate yet. The dems suck, Richards gives driver's licenses to illegals, Kuchinich is insane, Biden is a narcissiet, Edwards is an ambulance chaser, Obama is a racist. Great choices!

When are the youth going to do their homework ~ follow the $$$ Q~where does the all the money end up ~ to buy TV time.The News tell you little sheep, who is going to be your next Pres and you buy it.
Look up what was said about WE THE PEOPLE many many years ago and start speaking up. Don't sell out like us old farts did ~ ROCK ON

i'm generally a conservative, disenchanted by the republican party since the bush administration, now essentially a independent/libertarian. i have to take my hat off to Kucinich though. he's painted by the MSM as a bit of a wacky bird, but he's the only one up there with any consistency and integrity. Obama and Richardson are close. Dodd and Biden are ultra-polished politicos, no doubt about it, but also empty suit politicians/ demagogues. for the modern dem, their biggest crime is that they are grey-haired white males. HRC, however, is, and always has been, nothing less than a utterly unprincipled criminal. remember the poll that had her ranked as evil as Pol Pot and Hitler? wasn't far off. all the dozens of mysterious deaths of the insiders and enemies of the B.Clinton governship, i mean, how clueless can this country get? if she gets elected historians will ultimately mark this as the turning point of the downfall of America's status as a world superpower. this country will officially have a voting majority of commie sympathizers, dumb/guilty people voting strictly based on a candidate's gender, and other clueless idiots susceptible to the lamest and weakest lies ever foisted on the public.

Unless they put a gun to her head, they didn't force her to ask the stupid pointless question about jewelry. She CHOSE to follow their direction. She could have EASILY asked her own question, but chose not to, then decided to make excuses for her own cowardice later.

The American public are just as much to blame as our oppressors for the oppression we face every day because we ACCEPT the oppression without resistance.

Stand up. Have a freakin backbone. ASK YOUR OWN DAMNED QUESTIONS.

"Bush doesn't drink alchohol or take drugs"

Tell that to Hahvahd Bush. Hypocrisy isn't acceptable just because "you don't do it anymore". Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic, even if you abstain. Once a cokehead, always a cokehead, even if you abstain. You can't turn your back on yourself just because you desire to be more than that.

Personally, I don't think the "Diamonds vs Pearls" question made Hillary look good, I think it made her look like a money grabbing bitch, which is exactly what she is.

Open displaying of greed is not something that endears me to candidates. In my opinion, this question pissed me off toward Hillary more than the Yucca Mountain question would... Not because nuclear waste disposal is not important, but because it just showed what a materialistic cunt she is.

If there are any Oswalds out there, they should keep in mind that an easy shot is easier gained BEFORE they reach office.

With the exception of Kucinich and Paul, my feelings toward this elections runners range from disinterest to disgust.

Its likely that our country will be stolen away from us again, and nothing short of an Article V convention or outright rebellion is going to get it back.

"Tell that to Hahvahd Bush."

Bush went to Yale, dumbass.

Pretty in pink
Has America lost It's mind...This woman will distroy us..If for some sick reason you must vote for her... than at least have the sence to vote all republican to ballance her socialism and give your self a chance to see how she acts in office.
The Debate... I thought it was the NFL...
Marc

LOL Clinton is back to her usual--she learned well from Slick!! She's going to do whatever she wants because she has no fear of being reprimanded for anything--she's a gal, remember??
But, when it comes down to the last card, Hillarious,a.k.a. Nurse Ratchet, will be standing on the side lines saying,"Woe is ME

In November of 2007, Mrs. Clinton was asked about her position regaridng the anti-American disloyal marxist sellout Eliot Spitzer handing drivers licenses to ileagal imigrants for the purpose of voter fraud in the State of New York. Hillary Clinton stated she thought it was a good idea. Then when asked to confirm her position she said the moderator was trying to play a game of 'gotcha'.

In this moment of slipping and being herself, this dumb dumb has unwittingly created a capaign 'sticking' issue that will haunt her. She is grossly on the wrong side of this issue according to the leagal populations wants - no driver licenses to ileagals..

You hear all the talk about "undocumented workers". A riddle for you, what is a bigger threat to our nation than "undocumented workers"? The answer, "half documented workers".

So like other canidates refused to answer personal questions such as infidelity in a marrage, now she may do the same about answering any questions regarding her position on ileagal imigrants drivers licenses, as it is a personal issue and she wont involve herself in 'gotcha politics', or, pressing to figure out where the hell she really stands on an important issue... meaning, she's on the wrong side so pressing her hurts her, equates to gotcha.

This will further confirm her belief that it is better to lie because these dumb ass voters dont know what's good for them.

Ask me what I feel about the issue, press me like a grape, squeeze me as hard a you can, I want you to...its because I have nothing to hide, I believe what I believe and I am proud of it. My convictions are a SELLING POINT. So gotcha means pressing on an issue that your on the wrong side of, an issue your trying to hide from. So get to the truth of a presidential canidate's actual position and its 'gotcha', what a liar. Keep in mind she has also exposed that voter fraud for her party is more important than the public good, and she also showed her willingness to lie about the reason drivers licenses are "a good idea".

The New York Times 'reported' on the debate and called it a "withering attack". "withering attack"? Brutally bludgeoned, a horrific and mccobb massacre, a blood bath of epic propertions, a grizzly and violent assault.

For terrorist blowing up civilians, they are freedom fighters seeking their rights, it is 'differing insterests'.

Has the 'differences of opinons' against bush, a liar, war criminal, intentional killing of civilians, war for his rich friends, torturer, should be impeached...has that ever been described as a "withering attack"?

Do you remember when Bill Clintons second election run, after he was caught fondling the intern babysitter on government property. Where was the 'Separation of Sin and State'? The media framed the campaign contest as "are the Republicans going to 'go negative?", "are they 'going negative". But, with Bush, its not 'going negative' when the Democrats accuse him of war crimes in a time of war.

The media will help to dismantle the Clinton iron dike persona by shielding this babe in the woods from naughty men, how shall this withering flower stand agaisnt terrorists and the Chicoms?

So which is it? It's both. From the media who 'cares about the children' and is also militantly for abortion on demand.

Incredible paranoia by the media, paceing rats trying to outflank Clintons Chavez-ESQ dillusions. In issues of womanhood for strength, she can crush even brass balls with a godess finess, but when this social program pumping lesbian is so much as breathed on...chivalry is back in style suddenly, even for a butch.

The New York Times used these words to describe the conduct of the debates as it related to poor Mrs. Clinton, who in word pictures is curled in the fetal position on a cold wet concrete floor begging for mercy: "strikingly different in tone; parrying criticism from every corner of the stage; vulnerabilities that come from being a high-visibility candidate; attacked; challenged; assailed; tense and combative; target of attacks; surprised by the intensity; assailing her constantly; attacks; line of attack".

I dont agree with Mrs. Clintons politics, but I am sorry that she was repeatedly gang raped in a Guatemalan prison...hey, wait, this article was describing a debate she was in. Their is more adjectives in this article that two days of Court TV, the perverted red diaper false god worshiping zeolettes in the media, Clintons their gal...the Miss Marxist 2008 Idolatry Queen, forget womanhood, forget homecomming queen, this is about the propulsion of darkness and the propagandists are playing both sides of the fence.

"Here, lemmie me get that door for ya Miss Clinton mam, why, I sure would like to assist you in crossing the street Miss Clinton mam", and, "this bitch is as tough as nails and she'll crush the balls of the terrorists if need be".

I guess this battle ground will make the real worlds problems seem very simple when war tested Mrs. Clinton takes the healm of the most powerfull nation on planet earth. After all, the debate she survived, who could question her fortitude?

So I guess the campaign slogan is - 'hold the door open for butch dikes'

Their trickery is going to make her look weak in a time of war, in a time of terror, poor little miss Clinton, she's nice but we dont want to burden her with this difficult job of the presidency. What an abomniation our media.

Wolf Blitzer and CNN are communist propagandists. Wolf himself is a Marxists pervert form Isreal, came over here to help try to destroy our country. CNN is a bunch of hippie comies who forgot to grow up from the temper-tantrum 60's .

I cannot tell you how uplifting it is to hear 90% of these comments. I thought I was the only one who understands the type of people that Hill and Bill are! For sure, they do not belong in the White House!! They are able to fool so many people into thinking they care. They don't care about anyone but themselves and power. Why haven't they ever been asked about the pardons, and so much more?

Some day I would like to see someone make a movie about this:
It would show Clinton in his last days of the being president - remember when he was watching clothes dry and had absolutely nothing to do in the White House ---- With that in mind, then the movie would go to Bin Laden watching him do nothing, while they are planning the attacks!!!!!!!!!!! No President of the United States should have the free time to do nothing and make a movie about it, not to mention get his jollies in the Oval Office!

Cankles or piano legs?

"Don't you right wing nuts have anything better to do than whine all time. You better start showing some respect for the next president of the United States!

Posted by Pat | November 17, 2007 11:01 AM "

LOL... Now that's the pot calling the kettle black... Next president my arse...LOL. Once the first bimbo, ALWAYS the first bimbo.

Hey Chaos Motor -

You're right...it's all Bush's fault!

You're all making this way too complicated. CNN is wholely owned and managed by the New Left, "Progressives," "socialists," or whatever they're calling themselves these days. Hillary, whose first job out of college was for a card-carrying, self-proclaimed communist lawyer. Hillary supports socialist economic policies. CNN has already annoited her President. And this latest incident is only a symptom of the larger plot.

It's that simple.

The Democrats and Hillary have made their positions pretty clear:

Higher taxes mainly on people making over 100k
National health care
Out of Iraq
Avoid war if possible
Our enemies aren't really bad people
Bush is bad
Socialism has worked so well in the rest of the world let's give it a try here

Why would anyone expect anything else but fluff and left wing bias from CNN?

CNN is a liberal cause unto itself. They do fluff pieces on liberal politicians and those who are pro-abortion and pro-homo.
When it comes to Christians, it's smash and smear. Well maybe they can blame it on Bush.

you all need to get a life.

Well, this packaging will happen until Americans have had enough. Plastic, practiced, phoney, and power-hungry. Imagine Hillary being asked plain, unexpected questions and having to answer them based on her knowledge or lack thereof. Then, imagine it actually happening and demand that it does...or you won't vote for her or anyone unwilling to put it on the line. Do all women candidates have to be managed to this degree? Can't a woman run on just her OWN ideas and plans. Wake up students...someone is zipping one by you. We all deserve and can have better.

Ever wonder why the Democrats stayed away from FOX...?

Sorry, I don't buy it.
No one "forces" you to ask a question. The debate was live. What would they have done had you asked a serious question? You would've made a name for yourself as a strong maverick, not a CNN robot.

Glad you're sorry it happened, not glad at your excuse.

This person said spoxperson instead of spokesperson, and that is not a typo. It would be like spoksperson or something, they actually thought that was how you spell it. This person is retarded.

Question issue is not cool, but this person is retarded that wrote this and should never be allowed to write again unless CNN approves what they write in advance.

So...You want to shake hands with Hillary's lap dog ???

Here Wolfie, Wolfie !!!

HRC is the perfect standard bearer for this Democratic Party, which btw when compared to the party of Truman and JFK, is totally unrecognizable. If the party made decisions from a place of reason and not emotion, they'd be seriously considering Joe Biden. The fact that he's completely out of it at this point says a great deal about how little thought is going into this thing. I guess that's what happens when all you can think about is electing someone who will take money from someone else and give it to you.


CNN is CBS and the New York Times. Wolf Blitzer is Dan Rather and Jason Blair. UNLV is Columbia. The Democrats are cowards. Not a single entity here that is trustworthy or courageous.

KCG

Great job CNN! One stop closer to Bill "the rapist" Clinton and his socialist cunt wife back in the white house.

Hillary Clinton sees to it that everything is scripted out in her favor. Will the public actually want her for president? How would she have scripted 9/11 if on her watch. She lied to the press about Chelsea being down there during that time and Chelsea had to come out to the press and tell the truth that she was at a friend's home in the upper East Side of New York City. Lies come so easy with the Clinton's. She's been the darling of CNN for some time and you have noted, they didn't ask the hard questions.

All of you stop bitching. Acting indignant will do nothing if you don't do something about it. Get off your asses, having decent grammar and posting on the internet does not accomplish anything.

After reading the comments I have come to the conclusion that you people are insane.

The issue about the twitty question at the end of the debate is amazing. Unless the girl had a gun pointed to her head at the time, she was not FORCED to ask the question she asked.
Pandering to Hillary and asking a serious question about nuclear waste are obviously poles apart. CNN did an atrocious job with this debate and with their "analysis" afterwards. Fox news are such idiots that they make CNN look like professionals even though they aren't. Well after this debate, CNN has lost even that veneer of professionalism and neutrality. Shame on Wolf et al. Go back to journo school and I might watch again.

I read that only 100 tickets went to UNLV students and the rest of the UNLV tickets went to faculty and administrators and you can only have to guess who they were supporting. I also understand that there was a quota system set up so that minorities were included in the audience.

HC's make-up person deserves an Emmy. Never has someone so ugly and old looked so good and younger.

Biden's sneer was the best thing about the entire debate. The guy knew what is happening. He should have walked off.

I am surprised the last question wasn't "do you wear briefs or boxers?"

And waffling on a dumb question like that? God help us if she is elected. The woman is nuts.

Keep in mind that CNN, along with everyone else, was not warned, but was THREATENED by the Clinton campaign if any of their reporters had the audacity to emulate Tim Russert's behavior.

This is why you only see the smiling Hillary, the touching Hillary, the laughing Hillary, the hugging Hillary etc on all the newscasts. You certainly do not see the Hillary whose favorite adjectives and nouns start with "F". And you won't. They have been threatened, er, warned. Scary.

Instead of asking her about D&P, the young lady should have asked Clinton about Jack Palladino and who hired him and what were his duties. How fast would she had been tasered or how far into the desert would they have found her?

Sure am glad no other "respected" politicians have questions planted for them :)

www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/13/politics/main943382.shtml

Oh, come on! Maria Luisa should have just said "no" to CNN's request so she wouldn't look like a total airhead on national TV. The question was inappropriate and a waste of time. If CNN couldn't get anyone to make a fool of themselves by asking such a stupid question, they'd be forced to allow someone to ask an intelligent question. Maria Luisa needs to take responsibility for her own actions.

After reading the comments I have come to the conclusion that you people are insane.

-- Mental Patient

Hillary Clinton is as phony as a "nine"dollar bill. She considers herself "entitled" and not one of the "people". After all of the debates I have not heard one single position spelled out clearly..especially by her..These candidates are all fluff and no content! Hillary uses Her "race" card..womanhood...and her status as a former "First Lady" to AVOID the tough questions..Is there any other Senator..or elected official who flew around with Security and created a field of Security to avoid answering tough questions and avoiding the press? If these are the "BEST" our party has to offer we are in very sad shape. Only Kucinich says what he thinks..Gravelle is on the Ash Bin of History..and the others dance like Ballerinas..I cannot imagine Any of them LEADING our country or improving any situation we think we face. SHAME ON AMERICA FOR WORRYING ABOUT SUCH NON-CONSEQUENTIAL PEOPLE...

ANY AVERAGE JOE OR JANE COULD SAY CLEARLY WHAT THEY THINK AND WOULD DO ABOUT THE NUMEROUS ISSUES CONFRONTING US...these people are a SHAM..SO WORRIED ABOUT GAINING POWER THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT...IF THESE ARE THE BEST WE HAVE TO OFFER..PERHAPS WE SHOULD SURRENDER NOW UNDER THE BEST TERMS WE CAN GET AND DISSOLVE THE UNION..JOIN EUROPE OR SOUTH AMERICA AND END OUR MISERY NOW!

hILL IS AN EXAMPLE OF BUBBLEHEADS SEEKING GLORY AND RICHES RATHER THAN WHAT IS BEST FOR AMEMRICA!

If you couldn't notice those questions were scripted (especially the lady regarding retirement and social security) then you don't deserve to vote.


-----------------PRESS RELEASE------------------
November 16, 2007 - Atlanta, Georgia. In light of the current election season and to offer our support to our political partners, CNN is proud to once again temporarily change its name to, "Clinton News Network." We will assume the original name of "Communist News Network" once the election is over.
-----------------------------------------------
-- CNN PR Director

The student had a golden opportunity to indicate that the ClintonNewsNetwork directed her to ask a staged question (a corny one at that). She should have asked the commie, queen bitch how much a loaf of bread costs in todays markets.

Why don't republicans ever get these stupid silly questions? No wonder these pee-wee Democrats stayed away from Fox News-sponsored debates. They wanted an infomercial not an actual debate!!!

Curiosity compels me to ask: What would have happened if the young lady had ignored CNN handlers and blurted out her own question? Would CNN have tasered her and dragged her out?


CNN didn't hold a gun against her head or threaten her, but these liberal commies are generally very influential and manipulative--they have experience in manipulating thousands of people every day through their broadcasts, so I am sure tricking a college student into thinking it's a better question to ask then her original question was an easy task for them; when she later came to her senses, she realized how she was dooped.

-Aron

So, we will judge you for asking the question. You were the one with the microphone in front of your face. You SHOULD have asked your prefered question despite them telling you what to think.

"And the diamonds and pearls question? As a woman I was offended by it."

Ugh, I can't take it anymore. Really -- you were "offended" by it? You felt injured in some way by the question? You are a lesser person now, having heard such words uttered aloud? You are now in some sort of psychic pain because of it?

Really -- you were genuinely, truly offended by it?

You know, the hair-trigger "I'm offended" stuff that has come to dominate the American discourse is getting old. It's a charade, a game: Everybody knows that nobody is ACTUALLY offended in 99 percent of these instances, but we all sit here and pretend that something is supposed to be perceived as offensive, and we play the stupid game.

You weren't "offended" by the question, "as a woman" or otherwise. You merely heard a string of words that your brain realized provided an opportunity to PRETEND to be offended. That's all. You should apologize for lying to everyone here. And quit talking about being offended by stuff in the future. You're gumming up the discourse, making real communication more difficult, and causing the world to spin a little less efficiently than it should.

"As a woman, I was totally offended by the 'pearls or diamonds' question, just as I was offended that the male candidates were described as
'boys'."

No, you weren't. You weren't "offended." Quit lying.

Remember when Clinton came up with 'Midnight Basketball'? There's got to be a way to ease sexual frustration in high crime neighborhoods, 'midnight brothels'? Hmm, why not...

For example, the Clintonization of America. When high school girls ventured into routinely and irreverently performing oral sex on their guy friends. You and me re-voted him in because the money was good. You traded your daughter for money soccer moms. Maybe that's why you let your daughters dress like whores.

Hillary Rodham C. A communist antifamily lesbian Marxist. One of satins angels that makes Eve look like pre-Eve Adam. Mrs. Clinton has referred to imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt. She indicated she talked to Mrs. Roosevelt about being a first lady. "She usually responds by telling me to buck up, or at least to grow skin as thick as a rhinoceros," Mrs. Clinton explained. It would be nice if leaders in the White House prayed to God. Her and her husband never paid one months mortgage in their lives.

CNN had a debate?

Ninety-five plus percent of you would have asked the question CNN told you to, too. Google "Milgram Experiment."

Even people who think they may be killing somebody will do something somebody they perceive to be in authority tells them they "have to."

Very, very few people are impervious to peer pressure, and the people around them in those situations believe said people are total jerks for not going ahead and doing as they're told. People around them will heckle and giggle at heckling to curry attention with authority figures.

Try it sometime. In a group, openly refuse to do something an authority figure tells you when the people around you don't have your back. "Protests" and things where you have the support of peers don't count.

So, Demoncraps all, the only sane one Gravel of Alaska they baned from this made for liberal loons TV notadrama. So they get all gussied up and preen before God and each American who should not have been watching them make ready to kill America if ever any one of them gets elected President. The chance even if its only 10% one of them gets elected is much to high.

Wake up America mental cases all of them.

Even more, this girl was a student. Students are conditioned to do what they're told, automatically, all the time, by authority figures.

Don't think so? If you're a student, try a little experiment. If you're in high school, stand up in one of your classes. Move to the back of the room, keep standing, and refuse to sit down. Don't be mean, don't be nasty, just don't go sit down. Note the other students' reactions.

When the principal comes to get you, do go. Hopefully you won't get expelled.

But realize, this is over as simple a matter as standing up. That's all. Just standing up when an authority figure tells you to sit down.

She's a student. CNN was the "authority" in charge. She did what she was told.

Or don't you think bully boys would have hauled her out if she didn't do what she was told. How embarrassing. All but one or two of you would have done it too, so don't be a bunch of hypocrites.

Rapist and lesbo are marxists.

Maxism is the antithesis of a Christian society. And they have packaged their positions in such a way that the normal run of the mill uninformed and undereducated masses of airheads in this country bit on the bit.

Thery also attract the out-and-out rebelion against God - homosexuals, woman's "liberation" advocates, people with their hand out, and those who are simply to high-minded for the crusty and dusty Holy Bible.

Maxisism is simply the counter-Christ's answer. The ones that are smarter than God, the ones who crave power and other earthly indulgences answer to the way a society should be run. Godless and man-made principles. Instead of the way God himself has proposed we prosper.

Instead of saying "we are the anti-God alternative", proponents of marxism simply market their positions as the caring choice, the feel good way, the compasionate way...they appeal to the flesh and not the spirit.

Thats why Clinton and the Left cannot talk openly about what they believe. Homosexuality, abortion, and wlefare. What they promote is the exact opposite of the Bible.

I totally agree--the debate was flawed!!too bad Wolf was pro-hillary all the way. I was very dissapointed on how she let hillary express herself and did not follow up..hillary is a smart politician..I'm a democrat but I'd rather vote in a republican if hillary is the ultimate nominee...

What else did you expect but support for her from CNN? More commonly known as the "Clinton News Network". My personnal expectation is nothing less than slanted reporting on the best days they have.

I am a conservative who cannot stop laughing at these Democrats. It should be noted that they have everything going for them for the election: a twisted Iraq war, momentum from the 2006 election, and an extremely biased media protecting their backs (Oh and don't forget about the ACLU). If the Democratic candidate doesn't win in 2008, it would be a complete embarassment to your party. The Republicans have a huge hole in convincing the American public they can some how lead this nation forward. Hillary has no idea what she believes while showing no promise and Barack is dancing around on television. Are you kidding me?
Also, how about showing some decency to our president rather than treating him like a piece of trash. Attacking Bush's policies is fine, but attacking Bush himself is not. That is just a sign of immaturity.

UNLV = Brian Greenspun = Clintons

I know many in the top echelons of Las Vegas and UNLV. Bill Clinton and the Brian Greenspun go way back and he is a huge supporter of the Clintons. He also pretty much controls what UNLV does so nobody here in Vegas is surprised the audience was stacked in Hillary's favor.

This doesn't surprise me in the least. Hilliary's poll numbers were dropping in the last debate before this one and they needed to do some thing to bring them up, so they gave her some slow pitch questions right down the middle. This is exactly the same reason that every question asked of someone the media doesn't like for example Ron Paul starts as an insult and then turns into an accusation which if he's lucky he has all of 15 seconds to credabily respond while all the time being interrupted by the moderator.

Let's ask Judy Ruliani which s/he prefers: Diamonds or pearls?

Just to be fair.

Let's ask Judy Ruliani which s/he prefers: Diamonds or pearls?

Just to be fair.

Look, the news events are going to be scripted. That is the way the MSM wants it and the way the Clinton Machine wants it. The MSM wants to have a bit of a race for the nomination since they are paid by the eyeball, but they know that in the end Hillary will win. They know that Hillary is the only truly viable candidate for president in 2008, and they have accepted the inevitable. Therefore, they aren't going to go too far toward angering the ultimate winner bacause she could make life really hard for them once she becomes president.

Paul needs somebody to replace his table salt with lithium.

Didn't Bill Clinton give Monica a pearl necklace?

Let's hear which candidate will bring home the troops from the Endless War...instead of Endless Egos

Hats off to Russell (Nov 17 2:14AM) - he stated the Clinton Machine had dirt on her opponents and what do you know, the story that she has dirt on Obama but is not releasing it comes out today - what a joke! It's coming, but they will make it look like someone else released it (I think they were hoping Novak would release it) and then claim they weren't the ones.

They are scum and this proves it - how would they have the information in the first place unless they were digging through the trash?

For those who watched the earlier debate where Clinton was so dreary, Gergen and company were saying that she handled herself well. They were the only ones who thought so. The fact is I know what that jellyfish will say before he ever utters a word. Milquetoast was so gleeful at her performance in the last debate. The only two with any true fire are Dodd and Kucinich. Ugh CNN...i can see now where Republicans refer to it as the Clinton News Network.
Bring back Russert. These folks need to be tested hard not lobbed softball questions. Diamonds and Pearls was just one of the soft balls sent Hillary's way

C'mon people, when is the American public going to wake up! They stubornly hold on to their Christian values. A blind fool can see that man-on-man anal sex, killing a viable baby behind his or her monther's muscle wall and selling the parts for profit, and inner cities full of millions of criminal's being supported by you and me via welfare to reproduce more and more dependant criminals is the way to run a society!

WAKE UP!! Vote for Hillary, Hill/Bill, Rape-o/Lesb-o, its time to progress into the future with age old sin from the past, back to the future, or step forward into the past with us!! either way you look at it, lets get more sophisticated and worship mother-earth, mens anuses, dead fetusus, sloth, and the golden-calf god that is the "US Government", and two of its main deciples: Bill n' Hill.

What an exciting movement!! I feel the 1960's al over again., it gives me goose-bumps! Together you and I can give some supposed "creator" the finger! - Weeeeeeee, how Freeeeeeee!!!!!!

Far out, this is so cool, HAIL TO THE QUEEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It was so obvious that the majority of the audiency was pro Clinton by the booing and applause ratio that was heard by the TV audience. It was also obvious that Wolfie Blitzer didn't ask Clinton any difficult or follow-up questions. Why didn't he ask her why she changed her mind again and again about driver's license for illegal aliens? Did someone, as in the Clinton Machine, get to him as they did to the NY Gov.? Was Wolfie scared? So very obvious partisanship on the part of CNN. Clinton News Network.

Diamonds or Pearls??? Is she a candidate for the President of the United States, or "just" another woman? Imagine her going up against a foreign dictator? Does she run and cry foul if someone gets tough or disagrees with her? Or will she take us all down the road of Socialism where she feels comfortable? Learn from her performance history, young people, or it will be repeated on your life, and it isn't pretty.
Regarding the young woman who was "forced" to asked the question. It's tough to stand up for what you believe in a public forum, but, if not you, who? Clinton has told you all that you can't function w/o the govt. helping you. She thinks that you're all incompetent. What will you do when then a clintonesque machine comes knocking at your door demanding that you wear a burka or a star on your sleeve? Then it's too late. Read history beyond your liberal college professors tell you. Learn your history or you and your generation will be repeating it, and it wasn't pretty.

Regulating the questions reminds me of that great film about life in Soviet East Germany, "The Lives of Others".

S.

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate.

This was actually a brilliant satire by Maria.

Here is the inside "joke":
Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

"As a poor dumb white male once put it: "Methinks thou dost protest too much."
Posted by Good E. Nough | November 17, 2007 1:54 PM

Dumb white MALE?

Um, that was a statement from the Queen in Hamlet Act III Scene 2.

Nice try though. Thanks for playing.

Idiot.

I can't understand why anybody, from either side of the aisle, would try and put a spin on why NONE of the candidates have had to answer any tough questions. Russert tried to hold Hillary's feet to the fire, and that should be the standard for all candidates. Answer the tough questions on issues that matter. Anybody can spew platitudes all day long. The problem isn't with the candidates per-sey. It's with the citizens that vote who only care about the letter next to the candidates name, rather than whether or not the candidate will actually effect positive change. You idiots are the problem. If you could look at the election with an objective eye, you'd see none of these hacks, Republicans or Democrats is any good for this country. Again we are forced to choose the lesser of two evils.

Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

The recent Democrat debate was a joke. The drive-by media is so in bed with the Democrats, they offered to wash the sheets afterwards. Why is it that there has been no discussion on Hillary's past, her husbands lying, adultry, and having his Arkansas Bar license suspended for five years.
If Hillary is for 'working people,' she fled Arkansas which per capita has some of the lowest wages so fast the dust never had a chance to get blown away. Why hasn't her promise not to run during her service as Senator to New York, and the two hindred thousand jobs she promised for upstate New York whose econmy is in shambles!?
Marxism is alive and well with the Dems. Wake up nimrods, Democrats will take our nation back to pre-9/11 standards. Things aren't great now, but it will be far worse.

This is sooooo stupid.

Who cares what the presitential canedates think? Brit is being treated unfairly by some dumb judge in the hollywoods.

Get the prioreties strate.

Right on, RightOn. I knew that Bill gave Monica a pearl necklace, but I could not remember where. Thank you for reminding me that is was in the Oral Orifice. Bill Clinton is very generous to the ladies!! My god I cannot image 4 or 8 more years of Her Thighness and the former Rapist-In-Chief.

Hillary's planted questions have been going on for months, and the only amazing part of the story is that the media has taken so long to pick up on what has been happening with her campaign. When Hillary spoke at the Quality Inn/Highlander in Iowa City on April 3, 2007, she arrived late and kept the crowd waiting for about 40 minutes as she huddled in a back room with Johnson County (Iowa) and Des Moines party functionaries. Once she was introduced by Johnson Co. Supervisor Sally Stutsman and former Iowa First Lady Christie Vilsack, she gave her prepared speech and then took about a half-hour's worth of questions from the audience, which surrounded her on four sides with Hillary at the middle of the indoor open square space.
To put on the appearance of herself as the family values/loves kids candidate, about midway through her Q & A session Hillary took a rather long and highly scripted question which a schoolgirl spent about a minute reading from a piece of paper she (the girl herself) held, as the girl faced in the direction of the media risers and their cameras. The girl had been positioned in the front row, at the center of her quadrant of the audience. After Hillary gave her "isn't that cute" response, evidently imitated from the style pioneered by Art Linkletter half a century ago, she resumed taking questions from adults.
Finally, after another 10-15 minutes of Hillary ignoring children, Christie Vilsack rose and interjected, "it's almost time to go, time for one more question." On that signal, Hillary went straight to a schoolboy located in the front row, middle of the audience, 180 degrees opposite from the schoolgirl. Once Hillary gave another "isn't that cute" response to the boy with his back to the cameras, the Q & A was indeed over, and the crowd started dispersing.
The whole thing was as patently contrived at the schoolkids who provided "happy Chinese children" background for Nixon on his historic trip to China, viz. kids who had their jump ropes and hair ribbons confiscated as soon as Nixon left his outdoor appearance site. So, I went to look over the kids in the Quality/Highlander audience a little more closely. The girl and her mother were rewarded by having their picture taken with Hillary. The boy was wearing a Hillary staff badge. Just prior to this event, Hillary had promised ex-Gov. Tom Vilsack, who was there with Christie, that she would help him retire his campaign debt from his recently failed presidential bid. --END--


The chess clock is a great idea. Only I would say only one speaker at a time. Add to that, the candidates submit questions, and they all discuss those questions. Every candidate gets asked every question, even if all they do is say, "Pass".

Then a moderator who only pushes them along if they slow down, but he doesn't get any real say.

The readers of this article seem to be a very smart and informed group. That's the good news.

Who cares if she asked a stupid question?

http://askaslacker.blogspot.com/

almost a truman scholar?!?!

if she couldn't win the truman, then i wouldn't expect a hard-hitting question from her.

lightweight.

Next question will be "Obama, do you prefer a Corvette or a Lamborghini?" And that's about as deep as Communist News Network will get with the Democrats!!!!!!

O.K. Slacker. That question represents the kind of questions that Hillary thinks should be asked. She takes it as a personal attack when someone dares to ask her to give a position on the issues. It seems like the smartest woman in the world would be happy to answer any question. She is running to run the country. Diamonds and Pearls? Whatever.

So, does anyone out there REALLY think today's political process is a substantial discourse on the issues? Forget it. It's sound byte city, baby. That's what people care about. You can rave all you want about who asked what question, but if you want to know what people really care about, check the Nielsons, then you may as well pull the covers back over your head. CNN, Fox, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, even the Weather Channel; who cares anymore? We've got American Idol, Survivor, and whatever else is on TV. Lowest common denominator. Get used to it.

Bill assaulted women. When the women came forward, Hillary assaulted them next.

Bill and Hillary both abuse women. Bill assaults them pysically. Hillary assaults their character, their background, and trashes them in public and the media. She abused them mentally and emotionally once they told the truth of what Bill did to them. Hillary may as well have raped them herself.

No rapist as first man. No enabler of abuse of wmen as president.

Say no to abuse of innocent women - no Billary in the white house, no blow jobs from 19 year olds for Bill, no dropping trou, no rapes.

NO TO BILLARY.

Grace

Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

Why did Wolf Blitzer roll over for Hillary?

Because otherwise Bill would have fucked him in the ass.

Wolf was scared of Hillary's untrimmed wookiebush.

Watch this video of Bill Clinton discussing jewelery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

Take that cigar and smoke it.

The fact that they did nothing to dispute their obvious skewing of this debate, it's completely clear that the collective stupidity of the liberal, left wing Democrat Party was, and is, overshadowed only by their mind numbing intellectual dishonesty.

Classic feather light debate where nothing was settled and Clinton got softballed. But hey, you liberals get what you deserve because if you all think that SHE'S going to pay for all of her socialistic policies, then you're all so very worthy of the party mascot of which you all belong, which is of course, the Jackass.

Bring oral sex back into vogue!!! There are 8 years worth of kids who do not know what fellatio is all about. Elect Mrs. Bill Clinton. Keep perversion alive. Diamonds or pearls?? OK.

And than they wonder why Biden has trouble breaking thru the top tier? The fix is in folks, the fix is in. Hillary is the most defeatable Democrat. They want easy pickings for the Republican nominee. Biden would be a shoo-in for the Democrats.

CNN has become Fox News.

Any credibility they had has been blown. They have stacked the deck six ways in favor of Clinton.

The moment I heard the "diamonds or pearls" question, I knew it was planted to favor Clinton. Since she had a pat answe already, with an appropriate facial expression fo feigned surprise/delight, I think she was waiting for it. I think it was CNN's gift to her. CNN was saving it to be a closing question, and to give Clinton the opportunity to end the debate on a note of humor, while also affording her the opportunity to "show" that she can quickly make choices, even if in a humorous way. It was to be counterpoint to her waffling on driver's licenses for illegal aliens.

Speaking of aliens, in the closing question of the previous debate they asked Kucinich about UFOs. Clearly, this was an "are you still beating your wife?" question intended to make him look crazy.

Very crafty.

These questions reinforce the argument that these are the Clinton Presidential Debates

Note that in all these debates, Clinton is always positioned center stage, and she gets more questions and more time than anyone. Note that most of the the questions of other candidates, which are selected and phrased by CNN, are structured to elicit responses that will reference Clinton's positions, so that she still gets the attention, and then gets to respond, giving her yet more time.

I'll go one better than the chess timers.

I say, give the same time to all the candidates, ask them all the same questions, put them in isolation booths where they can't hear the other candidates' responses, and after their time is up, their windows go opaque and their mikes are shut off.

I agree that if their responses are short, they should be able to bank the time for other questions. Limit the questions to issues, and require that both the questions and the responses be devoid of any references to other candidates. The questions continue until the candidates run out of time, and the shorter their responses, the more questions they get to answer.

About DEW--Is anybody awake at the other end of this thing? Anybody reading these posts before they go up? Same question re "sky marshal" Jake B. He's a sky marshal like I'm Marshal Dillon. Then we've got "Billary"'s sexual speculations.

Let's see: Nazism, racism, and obscenity... I see an Intel ad at the top of the page. Intel, do you know what you're sponsoring?

I wish Hillary were more honest. During the holiday season her husband Bill used to give half of Washington pearl necklaces.

Tired of NlGGERS?

Visit the forums of www dot NlGGERMANIA dot ORG

That's http://www.niggermania.org

The young lady was free to ask whatever she wanted - because this is America. If she had gone ahead and asked a question she wanted to ask, CNN approval or not, yeah - they'd have cut her off, but at least a whole lot of people would have seen it for what it was - censorship. Yes, I think she has to take responsibility for the choice she made (to ask the diamonds & pearls question), but we can learn from out mistakes. Gotta be quick on your feet, dear.

One other thing - I am sick and tired of hearing people refer to the President and Republicans as liars when I read stories like this. Who are the REAL liars?????

I see that Bill Clinton isn't the only Sen. Fulbright,(D) ARKANSA, follower here. Real nice ******mania. Get lost. Really.

CNN clearly wants Hillary. Fox News clearly wants Rudy. Tim Russert is clearly one of the last true journalists left on TV. I'm hoping for a McCain-Obama race. That would be an enlightening race. Clinton-Giuliani would ensure the country stays bitterly divided another four years. Wolf Blitzer was absolutely terrible.

What amazes me about Senator Clinton’s campaign is that anyone is surprised by recent events. I place Ms. Luisa “diamonds or pearls” question on par with a question of boxers or briefs for the male candidates, irrelevant. The fact that it may have been planted by a CNN employee only supports the suspicions of many that CNN selected Sen. Clinton as the next President some time ago.

It also reinforces the use of gender as campaign issue. Playing the gender card has worked for her in the past so why is it a surprise to anyone that Sen Clinton is using it now. Has the media forgotten the Clinton/Lazio debate in 2000 where Lazio approached Ms Clinton and she shied away? As reported by the NY Times, a week later, Ms. Clinton portrayed Mr. Lazio as a “bully” in front of a group of mostly women supporters. Sound familiar?

A POX! on CNN and the Agenda Driven Media...there is no above board dealing with the public dishonest reporting on top of dishonest politicos is a recipe for disaster!!!

I am not sure why i get the feeling that US will head to the same spiral, vice cycle of the last 20 years (Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton, Interesting Pattern reminds me of emperors and kings not wanting to share the thrones they never really earned, scary also, do the math! WAKE UP!).

I strongly think we need a new approach to handle things if we want to keep our fundamental government. All i see is mediocrity and not democracy. All i see is politicians not people concern in improving the nation and the world as a whole. All i see is selfish, fat, self centered, i-wanna-win-and-be-cool candidates that should not be given the honor of representing us. It is a shame that no one has been able to be honest and to excel to prove they're the right choice for the seat, not even we the people.

Hillary should let things go, and should be ashamed of herself, She's gotta be kidding, reminds me of a Texas Chainsaw Massacre story line, psycho holiday. i mean can't we see the picture here. It's MAD, DISGUSTING to try to get to be the president of US after the scandal of her husband, what woman/man will be fine after been cheated, this is ultimate and extremely crazy.

It is also a shame the We The People as the only owners of this nation don't take responsibility for our government and our system. It is a shame that we let this president take away our rights. We are the people not the terrorists. It is a shame that we don't do anything about this situation. We are stuck in a big pool of mediocrity, this is not the America that succeeded, this is the type of society that ends up burned and ruined. Let's not let that happen.

OUR PRESIDENTS ARE MISREPRESENTING US! IT'S NOT RIGHT! PEOPLE WAKE UP! ESPECIALLY US YOUNG AMERICANS, LET'S TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY! THIS IS A DESPERATE CRY TO ALL OF US!

BTW, isn't the Republican, Democrat and other parties becoming obsolete here. If we want to build a good government we should work together not against each other. They claim they'll do that. But to me they keep going after each other's tails. THIS WON'T STOP with any of this candidates. Maybe with one exception, is he reads this, he knows who he is and he'll run and win.

Diamonds and Pearls? What do anybody in the world care what she likes? Who even cares if she's dead or alive? Who even cares?

What we care for here is who will end the war successfully, who will integrate out wealth for a better future, who will tie up the knots that no one for the last 20 yrs have care to do, for example, UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, JOBS, IMMIGRATION, SPACE SCIENCE, STEM CELL RESEARCH, EDUCATION, POLLUTION, WAR, WEAPONS IN GENERAL, DRUGS, AND MOST OF ALL CORRUPTION.

STOP THE BOAT

GOD HELP AMERICA

Trouble is, Democrats don't have an alternative to Hillary. She's beatable in a year when the party shouldn't be, but which of them has a better shot? Obama can't win (too liberal, and he'd be successfully swiftboated as a muslim), Richardson's not ready for prime time, Dodd just doesn't have the stuff. Perhaps Biden?

I tried to post earlier, and I guess it was "rejected" due to my opinion..
Let's put it this way. If, by some fluke of nature that the former Mrs. President Clinton were to become president of these United States, I would move overseas until her "reign" was over, or she were impeached, whichever came first. She and her loser husband are cut from the same cloth. They live by the "don't do as I do, do as I SAY do". It's their world, everyone else is just visiting. They are both liars. And unfortunately, they come from the South, as I do. They make all Southerners look like trailer trash. They both make me sick, they have NO morals, character, or integrity. And the former Mrs. President is trying to be elected on her husband's coat tails, on the "novelty" that would be if a husband and wife team would to be made president. Her years of experience? Only on riding her husband's coattails.
Just hearing her on TV, and I flip the channel, no matter what the show is. And the occasional " Billy and Hil Show" of trying to look like the normal American family/couple can only be termed as laughable. Every time (the few times) I see photos of them showing affection, I have to wonder how much anti-nausea medication it must take for each to be that close to the other. Her because of her knowledge of his 'misdeeds', and his because she is an insufferable wench. I am teaching my daughters to NOT use her as an example of a progressive, confident, moral, ethical, good woman of character. I specifically do NOT want them to be like her.
I am disappointed in our newsreporting of today. To read the news reports, the Former Mrs. President is doing such a great job and the public think she is the best thing since white bread. But to read blogs, posts, etc.... the general public don't see her that way. I am afraid that people may vote on just because they think it is the "popular" way, when it is really on the "newspaper owners" way....
Women like her make me, a woman, want to go into politics to show that we all aren't that way, the "Hillary" way. And won't try to win the "Clinton" way.
So, given that I have again tried to post my feelings on the "Clinton Royal Family", I wonder if it will be rejected again. I can't imagine for what, I haven't used profanity. I have only posted my opinion on both Hil's campaign and her "experience" or lack thereof, and of the "royals". ((I think Hil and Bil want to be the first royalty of this country)). Something I just can't help but notice, but where is Chelsea? Isn't she supporting her mom, or is she sickened by her mother's degradation of the modern woman.

According to the MySpace page linked above, Maria Luisa is 15 years old. Maria Luisa must be truly precocious to be a UNLV student at her age and to have been writing "policy memos" on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository a year ago at age 13-14. Also, the MySpace page is private so how can we verify the assertions Mr. Ambinder made in his blog posting? We can't. And that's what the MSM like, unverifiable reports. That way "we, the sheeple" just have to accept blindly the garbage they spew out.

Watch this video of Bill Clinton discussing jewelery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

Monica Lewinsky received the pearl necklace from Bill Clinton in the oral office. Hillary is a raw rough diamond, uncut, unpolished, and very far from brilliant.

Clinton News Network strikes again.

Clinton News Network strikes again

"Bush doesn't drink alchohol or take drugs"

Tell that to Hahvahd Bush. Hypocrisy isn't acceptable just because "you don't do it anymore". Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic, even if you abstain. Once a cokehead, always a cokehead, even if you abstain. You can't turn your back on yourself just because you desire to be more than that."


Mr. Motor.

Point taken. I have personal experience with this. The statement at least implied that Bush doesn't currently (and hasn't in years) used alchohol or illegal drugs. There are plenty of examples from all walks of life where this is not true. If you want to say that Ms. Lawrence is right and that Bush is a "hypocrit" regarding drugs and alchohol, then so be it. Personally, I don't care what he was. But if he kicked drugs and alchohol, then he derserves credit on that front. Her pathetic diatribe clearly implies that he is currently an "idiot, drunk, druggie who steals and lies." That would be her words.

We cannot have an intelligent debate when hatred, lies, and dis-information are quoted as fact.

The first giveaway of the uninformed (or the self-inflicted ostrich, etc.) is to accuse others of their own guilt.

That statement I stand behind. The person who wrote the referenced clap-trap is ill-informed, cannot carry a logical thought to a conclusion, uses lies instead of facts, and is the text-book example of a racist. That would be: judging a person based on his color of skin, rather than the content of his character. Poor old Clarence Thomas. I used to think he was quite brilliant. But Ms. Lawrence has enlightened me; he's just an ......Well.

I thought Bush went to Yale.

There is no such thing as alcoholism. It is an invention of the 'its not my fault,
I have a disease" crowd.

You either lift a drink to your lips or you dont, simple. No disease that I know of
forces your body to pour a drink, then forces your arm to lift the glass to your mouth,
then forces your mouth and throat to accept it. Its called temptation, some are tempted
more than others for alcohol.

To say once an alcoholic always an alcoholic is a lie. This is an excuse for people
to gain an identity of victim status and for attention. And also it feeds the temptation
by reaffirming over and over again that they have in the past fell victim to temptation, like repeating "I suck, I suck, I suck, I suck...", not good.

Alcohol or drugs are simply a habit which can be addictive, it has nothing to do with who you are, other than making a choice towards either makes a statement about what is going on with you spiritually at that moment in your life.

Dont blame me for the above comments, I'm just addicted to the truth and to reality, I cant help it.

Speaking of addictions, I hear Bill Clinton is still addicted to sex, and his fake wife is still addicted to power, and we the tax payer are still paying for both...

Are his lips moving?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs

Deny, Deny, Deny.

"I thought Bush went to Yale."

He did, I corrected myself but can't edit already submitted comments.

"You're right...it's all Bush's fault!

Posted by carole | November 17, 2007 3:04 PM "

What planet are you from? I never said that.

A person with some real integrity wouldn't let herself to be pressured into asking a lame question such as the one Maria asked Senator Clinton.

I could've sworn I heard Maria follow up w/ something along the lines of Clinton being the only one shining on the stage. If she really did, she needs to stop blaming CNN for any heat that she may have recieved.

I'm a little surprised that Maria Luisa so easily fell for CNN's trick move to have her ask an innocuous question of Mrs. Clinton at the "debate."

In was a live event after all. Maria could have simply asked her own question and ignored CNN's. What could they do? I am left wondering what would have happened if Maria, when she got to the microphone said something like this:

"As you all know, CNN approves all questions before we are allowed to ask them. But it my case, CNN supplied me with a question they wanted me to ask. I was assured that I would be allowed to ask my own question after I asked theirs. That's okay with me but I'm going to change it a little bit. I'm going to reverse the order and ask mine first. (Asks her question, presumably followed by answer.) Thank you. Now CNN's question is a sort of "Boxers or briefs" type of question. It is (diamonds or pearls question). Why would they want me to ask such a stupid question? Do they think all young people are so stupid? Is this a question the Clinton team came up with and didn't want to "plant" themselves? Mrs. Clinton, did you or your team have anything to do with planting this question?"

Being a live event, I wonder how Mr. Blitzer would have finessed his way out of this?

If she didn't want to *have* to ask the diamonds v pearls question, why did she write it and submit it in the first place? cnn did nothing wrong by telling her to ask her own question. don't blame them, take responsibility for your own actions and grow up. "oh, they forced me to ask light hearted questions..." no they didn't.

As to the waste that is supposed to "repose" in Yucca Mountain - it is not just from Nevada. It is supposed to include military waste and the waste now accumulating at 100+ nuclear power plants around the country.

That waste sits in very vulnerable out-of-reator fuel pools that must be circulating cool water throughout to keep highly radioactive used fuel rods cooled. There is little protective containment, period.

This fuel will need to be contained and transported to Yucca Mountain, traveling through major cities.

There is so much of this waste sitting around the country and still being produced by operating nuclear plants, that Yucca, if it opens in 2012??, will be filled within years of that.

And to think that there are people out there PROMOTING nuclear power as a solution to global warming. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results! Nuclear is not the answer - it is not an option if we are to maintain a democracy.

As to the waste that is supposed to "repose" in Yucca Mountain - it is not just from Nevada. It is supposed to include military waste and the waste now accumulating at 100+ nuclear power plants around the country.

That waste sits in very vulnerable out-of-reator fuel pools that must be circulating cool water throughout to keep highly radioactive used fuel rods cooled. There is little protective containment, period.

This fuel will need to be contained and transported to Yucca Mountain, traveling through major cities.

There is so much of this waste sitting around the country and still being produced by operating nuclear plants, that Yucca, if it opens in 2012??, will be filled within years of that.

And to think that there are people out there PROMOTING nuclear power as a solution to global warming. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results! Nuclear is not the answer - it is not an option if we are to maintain a democracy.

After watching Hillary plant questions at Newton, Iowa and the "Pearl or Diamond" question at UNLV, I can envision how a Hillary run US will look like. It will look more or less like the Musharaff run Pakistan. Hillary does not follow any rules of democracy. Her comment about how only a Clinton can clean up a Bush white house shows how she feels entitled to run the country just because she is a Clintonite. The planting of questions show how she is willing to put aside democratic principles and use whatever tactics (like what is happening in Pakistan) to tilt the polls in her favor, all because she feels she can. Our founding fathers restricted the number of terms for a president to 2 so that the country does not fall in the hands of one family. This country should not become an aristocracy. No more Clinton in the White House.

CallMeIshmael in this post wondered what would have happened if Maria Luisa had switched the CNN planted pearl or diamond question with her original question she was planning to ask. If Maria Luisa had stood up and asked a question othr than what was planted by the Clinton camp, they would have called her a heckler and asked security to come and take her away and tazer her. We already saw that happen when a student stood up to ask Kerry a question in Florida.

Would you trust miss Clinton to watch your kids? She would kill a baby
for more power. Does she like men - find them desirable, does she respect them? Does she respect anything? She doesn't even respect women. She has alligator skin and a iron spike for a heart.

What are miss Clinton's hobbies? None? Just the pursuit of power? Who is she? She is a hippie that got lost decades ago, now she is so far gone in strife that she has no personality, no being, just a warrior with a fake public act.

People will not vote her in, no way. Americans smell something about her like a fresh turd from a childs diaper, you know something is wrong.

Would you feel comfortable being around miss clinton one-on-one? NOT. Noway is America going to invite this bizarre humanoid into their living rooms for the next 4 years. She is insecure, has a huge identity crisis...her identity is derived from burying opponents - nothing more. A true cynic.

She has one of these insecure personalities that covers it up with a huge ego. She knows better than us, how to run our lives, yet she doesn't have the balls to reveal her true self because she knows everyone hates her.

Impossible for people to elect her, they didn't elect hound dog face Kerry for the same reason, he was a insecure mean high school nerd class president. A bitter personal failure such as miss Rodam Clinton.

People in this country vote in large part for VIBES...you got bad vibes...'you not get' voted in...that simple. And Clinton's vibe is like a wicked step mother that is controlling and looks to destroy the ones she has been entrusted with. Not a maternalistic loving mother that will comfort you. A helper. A strengthener.

No, her true developed skill is to tear down. People in this country know better then to elect that to represent ourselves on the world stage.

The bottom line, people don't like controlling bitches...she will not be voted in, period.

The more she hides who she is, the more she exposes who she is. This will only get worse as the campaign ensues. When the situation pressures her to give account, she is way to insecure to be rejected on a high level. Its easy to be rejected when you put out a false
persona because there is no personal loss there. People will see that they still don't know her and the challenge for the public will be..."who is she really?" As the public becomes more dissatisfied that they really have not enough information to go on to vote for her, instead of sacking-up and giving her neck to the wolves, fragile iron maiden Clinton will then revert to her protection - trashing her opposition and trying to control the information flow.

This will backfire big time on this huge national stage where the audience demands a certain level of vulnerability. The further along she is before the people realize she is unwilling to show her cards, the better for the opposing party. Because there wont be time for the democrats to chose another candidate.

The wheels will come off in a major and embarrassing way. The public won't buy this - 'don't reveal yourself just trash your oponent' stuff. Thats the kind of stuff dumb high school boys do due to shyness and testosterone.

There is a deep deep personality problem here. A complete lack of integrity. Trashing your opposition is not enough of a recipe for leadership, not to lead the free world. We need more.

We need a person that is big enough to be vulnerable. A person secure enough to humble themselves before man, before God. A person that is strong enough to fogive. A person that is courageous enough not to let the world create a cycnic of themselves.

Miss Clinton is a weak coward. She tries to cover this up with the age old dictator mask. A mask of supreme power and confidence, a mythology of complete control, such as Sadam Husein did. But deep within there is a shakey person. They are not very sure footed if taken away from their self erected throne of power that was made at the humiliating expense of others.

Even their fake vulerabilities are a staged act to try to personalize themseves, endear themseves to the viewers. Thats all the much they think of their fellow humans, ignorant trash not to be associated with. Deep inside they consider themselves trash.

The campaign of Hillary is not based on a person, but on a concept. They have cleverly left out the person. "Experience, qualifications, understands whats needed, bla, bla, bla". Thats because pitching the person that is Hillary is like trying to sell a catsup popsicle on a hot summer day to a lady in white gloves. Miss Clinton is a resume without the interview. She wants the job site unseen because she already earned it in her high mind. And if your to stupid to follow along she'll convince you otherwise not by leading, or selling herself, but by trashing her opponents.

Do you remember how these people stole stuff from the White House when they left last time? The pardons? The vandalism?

See you around miss Clinton...but never again in the Oral office...

I wish we could go one day without seeing HRC's face on the TV or on the Drudge Report. I am sick and tired of seeing her!

I recall the poignant ? back when to Slick Willie:
Boxers or briefs?
Perhaps the ?, Panties or thongs is next!

Hi? i thin it easy

What a horrible thing it would be to have the Clintons in the White House again! Remember that video of Bill at the end of his presidency? Walking around with "nothing" to do. I want to see a split screen of that video - showing Bin Laden planning to attack Americans, while Bill was making that stupid video.

fzurbvko fdwog eiok gvxz lird hbtdquska kbgvia

fzurbvko fdwog eiok gvxz lird hbtdquska kbgvia