« A Biden Memo: The Real "Clear Contrast" | Main | Hugh Hewitt v. David O'Steen »

Who ISN'T Planting Questions These Days?

15 Nov 2007 10:48 am

If planting questions is part of the Clinton ouevre, it's still surprising that a flood of questioners haven't outed themselves (although they might be embarassed).

The Nation's Ari Melber thinks he may have found the Clinton plant disease in Salem, New Hampshire.

One of this examples:

The other YouTube clip, which appears to be from the same Salem event, features a young woman asking about Social Security. “Hi, my question is about Social Security reform, and I’m glad you mentioned it today. And, I’m asking because I feel like my generation has given up hope that we’re going to receive a Social Security check when we retire. So, with the current state. And I want to know, as president, what’s your specific plan to fix Social Security for my generation? Specifically, would you protect the Social Security trust fund, that’s running a surplus right now– but right now Congress can dip its hand into it and spend on other programs that has nothing to do with Social Security.” The YouTube clips, which were posted Wednesday night under the account meldoecase, include Clinton’s answers to both questions.

Sounds like a planted question, indeed.

But it probably wasn't a Clinton plant -- the question was probably crafted by one of the innumerable outside interest groups who are funding issue advocacy campaigns in the early primary and caucus states.

Divided We Fail, a project of the AARP, SEIU, NFIB and the Business Roundtable, aims to "engage the American people, businesses, non-profit organizations, and elected officials in finding bi-partisan solutions to ensure affordable, quality health care and long-term financial security – for all of us." Their supporters often ask candidates what seem to the human ear to be questions derived from a focus group. (What normal people use the phrase "financial security" when discussing retirement?)

Then there's Ed in 08, one of the two Bill Gates-funded groups operating this cycle. Ed stands for EDucation; Ed questioners (Eddies?) typically ask candidates for "specific answers" about how to "turn around" America's schools and lay out comprehensive K-12 reform proposals.

The ONE campaign is like the presidential motorcade of outside groups and is a full employment service for non-aligned political operatives. Arguably, it's the most effective of the bunch. Its questioners ask about poverty, AIDS and global health.

The League of Conservation Voters has "The Heat Is On," which vows to make global warming a priority issue for candidates.

Candidates are visiting early voting states in search of public support. This is our chance to place the issue of global warming before the candidates. Check out the Event Calendar to attend a candidate event near you

Then there are the 9/11 conspiratorialists, the Lyndon Larouchies, the anti-monetarists, the questions planted by rival candidates....

All of which is to say that it's impossible to participate in a totally pure town hall meeting where the agenda of the questioners and the wording of their questions are derived entirely from their own experiences.

Comments (11)

About two days too late, I realized that dressing up as a Lyndon LaRouche supporter would have been an awesome Halloween costume. Next year.

Whatever group it is, they should work on getting people that sound a tad competent...

http://political-buzz.com/

Seems to me you are conflating interest groups working to get their issue in front of candidates with a candidate planting questions at their own townhall meetings.

The interest groups are leveraging the townhall format to get their message out. The candidate already has a bully-pulpit to get out his or her message, so it seems there is no need to plant questions (at least not the same reason an interest group would do so). More likely that the candidate is trying to control/limit the scope of the debate at the townhall meeting.

There's a difference. A big difference.

Big-friggin-whoop. They all do it!

Further, it's not as if Clinton sent a plant to heckle another candidate.

You are still missing the point. It is not about: everybody does it. Its about: Craving transparency from government after years in the desert living under the Bush truthiness doctrine.

Its not about everybody does it! We don't want to do it anymore!

I'm Jo Jensen and I asked Senator Clinton the Social Security question. It was not planted at all. I'm passionate about Social Security reform, that is why I am a member of Students for Saving Social Security (S4) -www.secureourfuture.org. A non-partisan grassroots student group which is for students and run by students. We are not with any of the mentioned issue advocacy campaigns because we are independent and have a shoe string budget which mostly goes towards pizza and t-shirts for our student volunteers.

S4 educates students about the issue of Social Security reform and lets them know that their voice in this debate counts too – after all we are talking about our future and almost all college students when asked don’t believe that they will get a Social Security check from the government. S4 is basically a group of motivated students that wanted to make it easier for other young people to be able to make a difference and take action on an issue that concerns them and one that they are passionate about. Through the S4 website students register vote and students are encouraged to attend their local town hall meetings to talk directly with the candidates.

So for the record I did not work with the Clinton campaign, and my question was not planted. I arrived at Salem high school 3 hours early to get a good seat and after the talk, I raised my hand as high as I could and lucked out that she called on me. Students around the country care about this issue and it only cheapens our genuine passion when accused of having a planted question.

And to respond to Matt’s comment that “Whatever group it is, they should work on getting people that sound a tad competent... “ I would like to point out that it is incredibly intimidating to stand in a room with about 500 people and ask a U.S. Senator a question about an issue that you are passionate about. I am excited that I was brave enough to ask my question about Social Security, but now I understand why perhaps more young people are not asking questions due to the overwhelming environment.

Jo Jensen thank you for coming forward here .Doesn't sound to me like you're easily intimidated. Good for you..stay strong and continue to speak up.

Jo - thanks for having the guts to ask the question. Ignore the carping.

I can't wait for the return to the White House of the FBI files on opponents, travel office firing for the sake of their pals, losing then finding law firm records, cattle future trading, intern chasing Clintons. But I guess it depends on what your definition of is ... is ...

I mean lets face it, is there a single 20 something male in America today that wouldn't love to be able to claim that "that" was not really sex just a new definition of "second base".

Wooops, the Internets debunk another media commentator person's words. Or, to put it another way, "Jo Jensen" sounds like she is who she says. Go Jo!