« Polling In Iowa: Why A Lead Might Be A Tie | Main | Anuzis-Dingell: The Future Of The Primaries? »

America's Rising, And It's Raised A Bus

10 Dec 2007 03:48 pm

pics%20028.jpg

There it stood, in the center of of a convention hall at the Polk County Convention Complex. A massive tour bus, emblazoned with the slogan for John Edwards's final message iteration: "American belongs to us."

The theme to that slogan is "America rising." Positive. Crisp. Easily remembered thanks to a Bruce Springsteen song.

For the next eight days, Edwards and his entourage will brave the icy highways, traveling to medium-sized cities and small rural hamlets.

Edwards began his final stump speech with a joke about Hillary Clinton and the "silliness" of the end-of-year campaigning.

Then he said: "You are the guardians of what kind of human beings we'll have as the next president of the United States."

"We must," Edwards said later, "have a president of the United States who can restore trust between the American people and the president."

Here Edwards is reaching out to those Obama supporters who are inclined to choose Edwards second -- trust and accountability are the central organizing principles of the final, final stump speech Edwards will give.

Toward the end, he said: "Are we going to be looking for careful political calculation, or are we going to be looking for bold, strong leadership for the United States?"

He finished speaking, and the crowd, mostly inorganic, mostly uniformed union members, cheered.

And the bus rolled off stage left. And then somehow, it made it to the street level, one floor below.

Comments (12)

What makes a crowd "mostly inorganic"? Just because they work for a living and wear a t-shirt with a union affiliation, does that make their vote less valuable?

And by the way, next time you're at a Clinton or OBama rally, ask people how many of them showed up "organically"? Campaigns build crowds; all of them. If they didn't, you'd write about that too.

"What makes a crowd "mostly inorganic"?

I took it to mean they weren't wearing Birkenstocks, but I have no idea what Marc actually meant there.

"All Your Bus Are Belong To Us"

would have been much catchier.

"All Your Bus Are Belong To Us" would have been much catchier."

Considering that Edwards is going to win Iowa and the nomination by winning the base, I'd say the original "All your base are belong to us" would be even more apropos.

Petey, I'm less sympathetic about what he meant. I see this all the time -- a candidate, Edwards especially, speaks to a crowd of mostly union menbers, and reporters write things like "he didn't speak with actual voters."

Its worth reminding our press corps that working people, whether they like it or not, are citizens too.

"Petey, I'm less sympathetic about what he meant. I see this all the time -- a candidate, Edwards especially, speaks to a crowd of mostly union menbers, and reporters write things like "he didn't speak with actual voters"

Perhaps you're right. The meaning is unclear. And I agree with you that unions gets horrible treatment from the MSM, one of the things I think an Edwards administration is going to help ameliorate though the bully pulpit.

But I tend to see Marc as a pretty straight-shooter, so I'll assume he meant what I first thought he meant. If you're correct that he was saying union supporters aren't "real" supporters, then shame on him.

People just assume (erroneously) that union folks have been paid to show up.

Considering that Edwards is going to win Iowa and the nomination by winning the base, I'd say the original "All your base are belong to us" would be even more apropos.

LOLZ!

When are we going to get some real covereage of positions, not the horserace or an artsy description of a campaign prop

Re: griping about the word "inorganic," press flacks are fascinated by the prospect that "ordinary folks" can be inspired by the political process. Actually, let's just say "politics"--these folks supposedly are untainted by the knowledge that any "process" exists at all.

The problem is--as Marc alluded to in his last post--ordinary folks do not show up at the caucuses. Who do you think is going to show up on a cold dark post-NWE hangover night? Probably the same people that showed up four years ago: the local party hacks, the old people who have been called 938452 times and have nothing better to do, and the crazy "political fans" not unlike those who post reply comments on this site. Inorganic indeed.

And this is why Barack Obama never had a chance in Iowa, because even though Obama has people who know better (John Norris, for instance), his field strength looks suspiciously like that of Dean or Bradley. He is the big story right now, but he is merely a sideshow to the question of who gets the nomination.

The key story is whether Edwards's organization is strong enough to withstand the best punches Teresa Vilmain, the Dewey Square All-Stars and Iowa's best field staff can muster. The Iowa field battle of Edwards vs. Hillary is going to decide the whole thing, and as you can see it's not even fair.

In this fight, Hillary is about a good a bet as the Patriots vs. the Jets against the spread.

"The key story is whether Edwards's organization is strong enough to withstand the best punches Teresa Vilmain, the Dewey Square All-Stars and Iowa's best field staff can muster. The Iowa field battle of Edwards vs. Hillary is going to decide the whole thing, and as you can see it's not even fair."

Yup.

But I'll take a thoroughbred vote getter against the best that Dewey Square, Glover Park, and Penn, Schoen can muster.

Hillary's org shouldn't be underestimated, but if Edwards can't overcome a bunch of Beltway weenies, he doesn't deserve the nomination in the first place.

You win nomination races by winning elections. How you win those elections is irrelevant, be it by owning the Beltway hacks or be it by having the best candidate.

January 3rd is going to be a very interesting day.

Sean, have you checked the internals lately? Obama is now performing very well among people who have caucused in the past.

Michael Whouley or whoever the DSG has working for Clinton in Iowa are going to have their hands full. Say what you will about turnout and organization, but the outcome in 2004 did not differ dramatically from what the best polling was showing.