« Updates | Main | Early 2007 All Over Again »

Local 226'S Power In Nevada

13 Jan 2008 08:19 am

Barack Obama's confidence-inducing endorsement by the Culinary Workers Local 226 in Las Vegas is a major boost to his chances in Nevada. 226's endorsement was ferociously courted by all the leading candidates, all of whom are well aware of its value.

But there are reasons to believe that the endorsement won't matter as much to the outcome of the caucuses themselves.

Consider: while the union claims 60,000 active members, many are not registered voters because many are not citizens.

Most 266 members live in four, compact Assembly districts in Clark County, but on the day of the caucuses, at least a third of them will be working. (It's MLK weekend -- one of the busiest weekends of the year in Las Vegas.)

The caucus rules helpfully carved out at-large caucus precincts -- this is now the subject of a last-minute lawsuit, possibly initiated by Clinton supporters -- on the sites of major employers, but the delegate haul from them will be small: less than 5% of the total. And remember: delegates in Nevada, as in Iowa, are allocated proportionally.

Local 226 has greater sway in state elections, where the popular vote matters, and in Assembly districts. But its power in caucuses is unproven, and there are reasons to believe that it will not make too much of a difference for Barack Obama.

There are reasons to believe that members of the Culinary Workers, like the SEIU, which just endorsed Obama in the state, are not solidly behind Obama, although a majority, or a plurality probably support him.

Now -- the union has put its reputation on the line here, and when the Culinary Workers "go all out, they go all out," one Nevada political analyst told me.

Make no mistake: Obama's campaign is glad to have the 226 in their corner. But some journalists -- myself included -- have portrayed the endorsement as dispositive. On second look, it just isn't.

Comments (28)

Clinton focuses on economy in Presidential race Obama focuses on RACE!LETS ALL CONTINUE TO DO THE JOB THE MEDIA FAILED TO DO, EDUCATING VOTERS AND NOT PUSHING AN INEXPERIENCED RACIST DOWN OUR THROATS!!! IN A TIME OF WAR AND PENDING WAR AMERICA WOULD BE FOOLISH TO THROW SUPPORT BEHIND OBAMA...IT WOULD BE THE LAST FALL OF THE US. WE CANT AFFORD TO GIVE HIM 4 YEARS ON THE JOB TRAINING SEE HOW THAT WORKED OUT WITH BUSH!!! SENATOR CLINTON IS THE BEST CHANCE WE HAVE TO START HEALING IMMEDIATELY! SEND OPRAHBAMA BACK TO ILL TO GET SOME EXPERIENCE AND SOMEONE NEEDS TO TELL MICHELL OBAMA TO SHUT UP!!! WHITES AND HISPANICS ARE EXTREMELY SICK AND TIRED OF HER RACIAL REMARKS!!!! WHAT A POOR EXCUSE TO BE FIRST LADY, SHE NEEDS TO LEARN TO BE A LADY FIRST! ALL AMERCIA NEEDS HELP NOT JUST BLACK FOLKS OBAMA!!!!

BY DENNIS CONRAD
WASHINGTON -- For the Barack Obama household, 2005 was a very good year.

Not only was Obama sworn in as a freshman U.S. senator, but he reaped big bucks from book deals and his wife got her own promotion and hefty pay raise.

Their total reported household income surpassed the total from the seven previous years combined.

According to joint tax returns filed with the Internal Revenue Service, the Obamas, had $1.67 million in total income last year.

Book royalties and advances brought in about $1.2 million for the senator-author. In late 2004, Obama landed a three-book deal worth $1.9 million. The first book under the contract, The Audacity of Hope:

During 2005, the South Side Democrat's income as a public official almost tripled to $154,047, after he left the Illinois state Senate for the nation's capital.

His wife's income as an administrator at the not-for-profit University of Chicago Hospitals nearly tripled to $316,962, from $121,910.

**(Ms. Obama, vice-president for external affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals, putting out feelers indicating she'd like to get some corporate management experience.” As if working for a hospital that charges uninsured minorities 5.4 times as much for drugs as Whites with insurance isn’t enough cold hearted corporate experience. Plus she cause hundreds to loose their 11.hr jobs she said to be more efficent)

In 2005, she was also elected to the board of directors of west suburban Westchester-based TreeHouse Foods, which calls itself the nation's largest pickle and pepper supplier. For that, she received $12,000 and $33,000 from a subsidiary.
On Nov. 26, it announced plans to close its La Junta, Colo. plant, a move that claimed the jobs of 153 workers, most of them Hispanic — a big blow to a rural town with only 9,500 residents. The jobs paid a starting wage of $11 an hour, good pay for the area. I share the sentiment. Companies that pay top execs tens of millions a year while squeezing the little guys on the production line or in the back office are destroying middle-class America.
Which raises a question — not about corporate values but about Mr. Obama's values. Specifically, while Mr. Obama bashes Wal-Mart, why does his wife, Michelle, make $45,000 a year serving on the board of a Chicago-area company that pays its executives a very hefty amount of money while laying off mostly minority workers in an economically deprived area, a company whose No. 1 customer is — you guessed it —

I'm afraid that the Culinary Workers endorsement has set expectations so high for Obama in Nevada that if he doesn't win, the press will eat him alive.

In which case the Culinary workers may come in handy after all.

In reply to 'Obama is a Risk for U.S.' ... Bill Clinton has collected more than $50 million since leaving office. $50 MILLION! Some of that from hedge fund buddies, some of that from Dubai (United Arab Emirates). Mrs. Clinton was formerly on the Board of Directors of Wal-Mart.

Can you show me where the Teacher's Union endorsed Senator Clinton? Last time I checked, they weren't her supporters. Get your story straight.

From the Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/12/us/politics/12nevada.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

"The Nevada State Education Association has said it would not endorse any Democrat, but some of its top officials have endorsed Mrs. Clinton. The association’s deputy executive director, Debbie Cahill, for instance, was a founding member of Senator Clinton’s Nevada Women’s Leadership Council."

Dirty deeds done dirt cheap.

Marc,
I live in Vegas and can tell you that Obama is up against a well-oiled state Dem machine that is working very hard for Hillary. This includes Rory Reid, son of the senate majority leader, and much of the state's Dem politicians, and the Las Vegas Sun, the "liberal" paper here.

The level of plain old corruption in Dem politics here is just stunning, and I say that as someone who lived in Louisiana for many years.

The caucus lawsuit is a meritless, transparent response to Culinary's endorsement of Obama. It is well known here that most of the leadership of the teacher's union has publicly supported Clinton. Do any teachers work on Saturdays? What crap. I'm watching Hillary spin it right now on MTP, and it is just disgusting. Anyone with an iota of sense knows that had Culinary endorsed Clinton this lawsuit would never have taken place.

I can promise you that Dems who have been on the receiving end of Hillary's Republican-lite dirty tricks will not soon forget, and will not be inclined to vote for her this fall. She is a terrible candidate who has managed to divide the state party, the Culinary union, the national party, and the nation.

BillB


Not sure if you noticed Hillary's facial expression as she spun and spun on Russert, but she exhibited a classic liar's face: eyebrows raised high as possible, forehead creased, "I'm innocent". O.J. Simpson perfected this in '95.

"Most 266 members live in four, compact Assembly districts in Clark County." How would you know that? I find it hard that the union - or any union - would give you their membership data. It sounds like your pulling this out of your rear end. Or a campaign that didn't get the Culinary endorsement is putting it there.

If Obama keeps playing the race card, Clinton's already-strong support among Hispanics will only get stronger.

JoeCHI-

Obama isn't playing it; the Clintons are. But, you already know that since you work for her campaign from just outside Chicago, Joe Novak.

Marc-

It's nice when people who haven't been to law school or logic school use the word dispositive; it almost makes up for not knowing anything.

I have to agree. The race mongering by Obama is going to work against him in Nevada.

His arragant attitude that everyone has to step to the curb for him to pass is insulting to ordinary working men and women.

He will score some cheap political points with African Americans in South Carolina but he is turning off everyone else.

As a lifelong democrat, watching the methods of the Clinton campaign make me realize why some people actually voted for Nader in 2000 (a year when Gore was emminently more supportable). Not saying I'm going there yet, but it makes me understand.

I can't believe how many Clinton sock-puppets are being paid to comment on this blog today. Clinton's race-baiting is a disgrace, as are her efforts to suppress the vote in both NH and NV. Then she goes on MTP and lies and lies and lies about her distortion of Obama's voting record and comments in the Iraq war. Well, Sen. Clinton, there are 3 debates left and we are going to call you out on your lies.


His arragant attitude that everyone has to step to the curb for him to pass is insulting to ordinary working men and women.—— k-k-k-ken

Can you cite even one utterance or policy position from Barack Obama that leads you to make such statements?

There is only one candidate in this race who oozes entitlement and "step aside" hubris, and it certainly isn't Obama.

Wow, will every comment thread now turn into unhinged, off-topic "Obama sucks, no Clinton does" rants? Sad.

Michael's mom, vocabulary cop- I don't know how they teach it in law school or "logic" school, but the way they teach the definition of "dispositive" in liberal arts school (and that pesky dictionary), Marc deploys the term just fine.

And with unions, nobody knows anything anymore. I want to believe the Culinary Workers can deliver for Obama, but when was the last time a union endorsement was prerequisite or even crucial for victory in any big, competitive race? I can't remember, but I'm thinking it's been quite a few cycles.

Obama's campaign made a huge mistake when they started falsely trying to twist words and portray the Clintons (of all people) as racist, and his surrogates calling the New Hampshire voters closet racists. "Vote for me or it proves you are a racist" or "Don't you dare call Obama inexperienced or you are a racist" is not good campaign strategy.

I doubt that it is going over well in Nevada. The Culinary Union endorsement isn't going to help him if that strategy is turning off the voters there like it is elsewhere.

Billionaire Clinton backer Bob Johnson, who founded Black Entertainment Television, said he’s “a little bit insulted, if you will, by Senator Obama letting his campaign imply that Hillary Clinton does not revere what Martin Luther King did for African Americans.”“I think that’s taking it way too far,” he said while campaigning with Clinton in South Carolina. “I think Barack understands clearly what the senator was saying.” “Nobody believes either Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton would say anything that would denigrate either Barack Obama or Martin Luther King. And to me, what may happen is a backlash may occur when people see that Barack Obama is allowing his PR people to let out the notion that Hillary Clinton did not respect everything that Dr. Martin Luther King or any other person who faced the problems and the threats of being a part of the civil rights movement faced. ““And to me, Barack knows better than that.

Marie Jacobs-

No amount of surrogacy can refute what I saw with my own eyes in NH. Secondly, so Bob Johnson supports Clinton; his ex-wife, also a billionaire, supports Barack Obama. And?

More importantly, Sens. Johnson, Nelson, McCaskill and Gov. Napolitano support him. You know, people who have to run in red states with the top of the ticket think Obama is a better person to run beneath.

Obama is playing the race card, all right. How many times does he channel the civil rights movement, as if he was the rightful heir to it? Please, he channels so many of these civil rights leaders in his stump speeches (from JFK to MLK)...these men have done more political work than this rookie senator has in his lifetime. It's really ridiculous. He's all talk and grand proclamations, capitalizing on his oratorical abilities for people who clearly in a funk about the Bush administration. When people are desparate, they'd rather be flattered by his 'feel good' message, than the reality that this is a very challenging period in U.S. history.

Susan-

I didn't realize JFK was a civil rights leader. What explanation do you give for a Hillary introducer in NH suggesting JFK didn't get much done because he was assasinated? Wishful thinking on Hillary's part?

I just want the guttersnipe Clintons to crawl back into the gutter. No one not being paid by her campaign or not hopelessly blind to her faults thinks anyone else is promoting this. It's her and her minions.

“Hillary Clinton – A Lifetime of Walking the Walk.” Unfortunately political advisor Sidney Blumenthal wasn’t so lucky. At 12:30 am. Monday morning, one day before the New Hampshire state primary Nashua police observed Mr. Blumenthal’s rental car careen through Greeley Park at speeds in excess of 70-mph., in a 30-mph. zone, and apprehended Sidney. (Funny we didn't hear about it, in a quirk of irony maybe that’s why Hillary teared-up and won NH.) Sid failed to walk the walk – failed the field sobriety test, got arrested - handcuffed. Kind of like Dee Dee Myers does every so often. Sidney Blumenthal, longtime friend and senior adviser to presidential candidate Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. was intoxicated. Free Bobby Seale screamed Blumenthal, before being tossed into the slammer for four hours. Sidney, who refused the Breathalyzer (burp), was booked for Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated, DWI: http://theseedsof9-11.com

Marc,

Political journalism is not a test of your reading comprehension of Hillary's talking point memos. You still have a lot to learn.

In office, JFK didn't get to accomplish much because he was killed, but he was already a U.S. senator and a Washington player for over a decade! People are so ready to smear the Clintons with so many political distractions. The Clinton administration was a highly effective one. For one, it cleaned up the budget and left the country's coffers with surpluses. And don't say that Hillary had not learned a lot from being in the White House with her husband, because she was a politically active and engaged First Lady. If anything, Obama is just as much as political poseur as the Clntons are! Only he manages to cloak his ambitions in the Mr. Nice Guy image and his relatively newness to the political scene. But he totally milks voter's dissaffection with the Bush adminsitration with his "change" rhetoric for what it's worth. His rhetoric is nothing new. (BTW, I am not a cynical 60's type person. I'm a women in my early 30s and a person of color!)

Susan:

My wife works in my office (I'm a doctor) helping with book keeping and appointments. Would you be willing to contend that she should treat patients because of her close proximity to them for the past 10 years?

Supporting someone on the sole basis of her gender is pathetic. Grow up, please.

it's amazing how politician's are able to play the american people into believing crazy stories. Obama had nothing to do with HIllary's remarks and how they affected other people. I am not a fan of HIllary and do not think her comments were racially offensive. I do believe that anyone looking for race can find it, but to say Obama is plating the race card is just sick. In ways this is also a ploy by the Clinton campaign. Many say that Obama is able to transcend race because he does not play the race card. I do believe this is a ploy to lable him as doing so. I believe this is all panned. Remember Obama is no more Black than he is white. The American people have just been hit again by another political strtegy... Wake Up America !!!!

Please google Obama and Alice Palmer to find out just how interested the man is in letting the people vote for the candidate they want. Through legal challenges, he knocked ALL of his competitors out of the race and ran uncontested.

Oh, but don't worry--he felt bad about it. Sort of like Huckabee felt bad about showing that ad he wasn't going to show.

Folks, they are all politicians, Obama included. I cannot wait out this recession while he tries to figure out how to do the job of the president, and I have serious issues with the campaign's strategy in Florida, Michigan and Nevada to draft "democrats for a day" to defeat his opponent. Where are these "democrats" going to be come November? Voting for anyone but Obama because we sensitive, liberal idiots may back away from his cocaine use and his church and other things mentioned here and everywhere else, but the republicans will not have their liberal guilt to stop them from going on the attack.

And to those of you who say it's Obama or no one else, you are absolute fools. I'm sure you're the same knuckleheads who stayed out when Al Gore and Kerry were running. Are you looking for a best friend or a person who knows how to get the job done?

The lawsuit filed by Clinton allies in Nevada against planned "at-large" caucusing Jan. 19 on the Las Vegas Strip is beginning to look a lot like voter suppression. As we know, the plan was drawn up and approved unanimously early last year by the Nevada Democratic Party leadership, with input from the presidential campaigns, to enable caucusing by Strip workers unable to leave work to caucus in their home precincts. Indeed the plan's creators include several of those who are now plaintiffs against it. What changed their minds? Barack Obama's endorsement Jan.9 by the 60,000-member Las Vegas Culinary Workers' Union changed their minds. When the plan was approved, Hillary Clinton was presumed to be the "inevitable" Democratic frontrunner. Iowa changed all that, and Obama's subsequent endorsement by the culinary workers has brought a Clinton win in Nevada into serious question. Since it is largely members of this union who would be caucusing in the casinos, the plan is clearly no longer in Clinton's best interests. Hence the lawsuit against the plan, filed just two days after the Obama endorsement and scarcely a week before the caucus by Clinton allies from the leadership of the Nevada State Education Association (NSEA), on the grounds that it would be unfair to workers in other areas. Why didn't they think it was unfair earlier? After all, the plan was approved nearly a year ago in the very name of fairness, to enable participation by those who would otherwise be unable to caucus. The answer is simple: Because the lawsuit has nothing whatsoever to do with fairness, and everything to do with stacking the deck in favor of Hillary Clinton. The Clintons themselves are not official parties to the suit, but both Hillary and Bill Clinton have spoken in support of it despite the fact that their campaign and others were included in the at-large caucus plan from its inception. They, like their friends in the NSEA, have had more than ample time to consider and reconsider the plan, but appear to have deemed it unfair only since the culinary workers endorsed Obama. While the judge in this case obviously has every reason in the world to throw it out of court, I don't expect that even if it prevails the culinary workers will allow it to prevent their members' caucusing. In fact I wouldn't be at all surprised to see chartered buses from the union shuttling members between the Strip and their home precincts to caucus, a lot of pressure on Strip employers to comply, and a lot of anger at the Clintons and their allies for this seedy attempt to change the rules at the last minute. The whole affair seems likely indeed to do the Clintons far more harm than good in Nevada; and as we know, what happens in Vegas doesn't always stay in Vegas.