« Common Sense, From Nevada | Main | Obama: Clinton Won Dirty.... Clinton Campaign: Obama Lost Dirty »

Obama At The Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta

20 Jan 2008 01:53 pm

Some pretty powerful speech-making:

And yet, if we are honest with ourselves, we must admit that none of our hands are entirely clean. If we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll acknowledge that our own community has not always been true to King’s vision of a beloved community.

We have scorned our gay brothers and sisters instead of embracing them. The scourge of anti-Semitism has, at times, revealed itself in our community. For too long, some of us have seen immigrants as competitors for jobs instead of companions in the fight for opportunity.

Every day, our politics fuels and exploits this kind of division across all races and regions; across gender and party. It is played out on television. It is sensationalized by the media. And last week, it even crept into the campaign for President, with charges and counter-charges that served to obscure the issues instead of illuminating the critical choices we face as a nation.

So let us say that on this day of all days, each of us carries with us the task of changing our hearts and minds. The division, the stereotypes, the scape-goating, the ease with which we blame our plight on others – all of this distracts us from the common challenges we face – war and poverty; injustice and inequality. We can no longer afford to build ourselves up by tearing someone else down. We can no longer afford to traffic in lies or fear or hate. It is the poison that we must purge from our politics; the wall that we must tear down before the hour grows too late.

Because if Dr. King could love his jailor; if he could call on the faithful who once sat where you do to forgive those who set dogs and fire hoses upon them, then surely we can look past what divides us in our time, and bind up our wounds, and erase the empathy deficit that exists in our hearts.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organizes for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She’s been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and the other day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

So Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”

By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we begin. It is why the walls in that room began to crack and shake.

And if they can shake in that room, they can shake in Atlanta.

And if they can shake in Atlanta, they can shake in Georgia.

And if they can shake in Georgia, they can shake all across America. And if enough of our voices join together; we can bring those walls tumbling down. The walls of Jericho can finally come tumbling down. That is our hope – but only if we pray together, and work together, and march together.

Brothers and sisters, we cannot walk alone.

In the struggle for peace and justice, we cannot walk alone.

In the struggle for opportunity and equality, we cannot walk alone

In the struggle to heal this nation and repair this world, we cannot walk alone.

So I ask you to walk with me, and march with me, and join your voice with mine, and together we will sing the song that tears down the walls that divide us, and lift up an America that is truly indivisible, with liberty, and justice, for all. May God bless the memory of the great pastor of this church, and may God bless the United States of America.

Comments (50)

We cannot elect the same people in the same positions to play the same old political games and expect a different outcome.

Obama needs to get at least 75% of the black vote in SC to ensure victory after Hillary's mojo from Nevada.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

why isn't this speech on CNN Ballot show instead of Sen Clinton and Rev Butts?

What Obama says is so important to all our future and the networks are editing what people see

Why isn't there a link on the internet that is easy to find to see this important speech?

I read the text and as a 50 plus white woman I am moved to tears

please - there is no justice if we cannot get the people of this country to make an educated choice --

Bill Clinton is going church to church - house to house so african americans vote for his wife?

For the Clintons is it only about winning - win at all costs..

They really think they are the only answer --
this is getting too sad to think of the lost opportunity this country may follow

Obama '08

The Clintons:it's all about US! Sometimes it is time to step aside for people whose time has come. We are not a monarchy-let us show the world a new face and new voices. Alison you are exactly on point!

Barack Obama is a man who is willing to challenge even his closest allies when he sees a moral injustice.

That he would go into MLK's church and call out the homophobia and xenophobia that are present in some elements of society today . . . that is why I am voting for Obama.

Alison, I too am a 56 year old white woman that is weeping.

I simply mourn that the world could miss such a grand opportunity to set aside the boundries between our factions within and without our borders to address all our common problems.

Vote hope, not fear. Vote people, not divide and conquer.

I long to hear and see the full speech--such an exquisite bit of writing. When Obama speaks, he challenges and encourages, teaches and consoles. I'm fascinated and touched. He is proving to have something extraordinary to offer a public that has gotten all too complacent and jaded by some forty years of politicians inviting us either to settle for incremental changes or to indulge our worst, most selfish desires, even to feel good about hating (gays, immigrants, anti-war activists, liberals, hippies, etc.). Love him.

I am a 50 year old white American woman. I love Obama. I love what he stands for. I am so tired of the hate mongering and the fear and smear tactics of the status quo politics. I agree with comment no. 1: the very definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect a different outcome. Where can we get a video of this speech? How can we get it on the air? I am living abroad, but if I were in the United States I would be going from door to door. Please, everyone who recognizes the goodness of this man and the hope for our nation, please DO everything you can to get him elected! For me, I will donate, and post, and donate, and post....

While the predominant discussion of this speech is in terms of race and unification, I thin kit is important to point out that this there is substantial religious subtext to this speech as well in the talk of forgiveness, and being one's brother's keeper, etc.

I see NH and NV as states where faith was probably not a big part of the discussion. In New England there is more of a sense of keeping religion to one's self, and in places like Nevada, there is more of a libertarian streak to these things.

But in the south and midwest, where many upcoming contest lie, issues of faith will play a larger role. And this sort of message could be very important to him even apart from the racial unity aspect of it all.

Gosh, it sure is odd to find three 50+ year old white women all commenting on one thread at an obscure blog and identifying themselves as such, but I guess it could happen. Do all of you have 2.4 children and 5.2 grandchildren and a median income between 30,000 and 50,000 as well?

As for the speech, perhaps Marc Ambinder might consider what his job should be. Hint: it's not to be a cheerleader.

For instance, should Ambinder ever decide to become a real reporter, he might compare Obama's statement about "immigrants as competitors for jobs" with this unreported scam.

TLB, I'm not a white woman but my wife and she is strongly supporting Obama too. I don't think the majority of white women are supporting Obama, but still in raw numbers it's quite a few, and they're likely to post in response to a speech by him.

I think if Hillary Clnton ever gave an inspiring speech it might get quoted. I'm not sure I've ever heard her say one thing that's inspirational and memorable. As time goes by, as someone who voted for Clintons in the past, she loses more and more of my respect. At this point I doubt I'll vote for her ever again for anything.

Perhaps she'd get quoted if she said such things instead of peddling idiotic and false smears and hitpieces from herself and her surrogates.

Allison,
All of Barack Obama's speeches are found on his website at www.barackobama.com. Click on the Learn link. He's the only candidate that I've found so far to do that.
Tere in GA

If people are spamming crazy chain mails about Obama, maybe Obama supporters should start spamming people things like this speech. or at least forwarding them to people they know.

also, if you have some time to kill:

http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1381682549&channel=825291844

It's Barack Obama answering question from SF Chronicle Editorial Board.

Why does a politician get to make a political speech in a church??? Does the church get federal funding? I believe in the separation of church and state.

About the cheerleader charges and counter-charges, it's kind of funny, and also getting old, to read this in various blog comment sections. If anything Marc is the Hillary-leaning counterweight to Andrew's blog.

I'm an Obama guy but I think Marc is pretty fair in his posts - and I certainly wouldn't call him pro-Obama.

We need more of this. THIS is who we are. What a speech!

rosie--
The reason a politician gets to make a political speech in church is because he is a person, the members of the church are people, and they all decided as a community that his message is relevant to their purposes for being there.
The speech was primarily about his idea that there is a shortage of understanding and compassion in our public lives--a deficit of empathy. And that it contributes to the great injustices of our time. He called on the community to be more loving toward fellow human beings and invoked the shining example of this church's late pastor, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. The legitimacy of all this is covered in the bill of rights.
No, churches don't get federal funding. They are exempt from certain taxes as long as they don't actively campaign for or against particular candidates. My understanding is that Bill Clinton will be speaking there next week; I'm sure John Edwards or any of the Republicans would be allowed to address the congregation if they asked.
I'm glad you believe in separation of church and state but to do that principle justice, we need to really understand what it means. It certainly doesn't mean that churches (as people and institutions) can't and shouldn't be involved in public affairs; after all, discussion of right and wrong, of justice and charity, and personal responsibility toward each other has always been a big part of what religion is. And these things are simultaneously intrinsically political as well. So separation means something a bit different than what your comment seems to imply. Perhaps a future President Barack Obama could clarify things for us someday, given his background as a student and teacher of Constitutional law and civil liberties.
Lastly, I hope you read or get a chance to watch this speech with open mind and heart. Whether you choose him to become our next President, what he had to say to us today is something we all need to hear and take to heart as human beings tasked with the privilege and responsibility of sharing this country and planet with one another.

Apparently there's some confusion over terms.

If this is a "reported blog", then Ambinder shouldn't be cheerleading for anyone. And, if this isn't the Soviet Union then reporters should start doing their jobs and a) asking real questions, and b) pointing out flaws in the candidates' policies.

For instance, Ambinder can note that the speech is great at the same time as pointing out problems with it; he only did the first. If there's a topic he doesn't understand, experts from across the spectrum are just an email away.

As for the SF Chron Editorial Board interviewing Obama for 52 minutes, seriously, you'd have to be a committed Party member to sit through such an ordeal. The USSR used to give medals for even lesser feats of endurance. Does anyone in their right mind think that the SFCEB asked Obama anything approaching a real question?

Unfortunately, I can't provide historical examples because their archives aren't online.

Well stated Jeff.

This is Marc's blog. If he sees something that interests him, he puts it up. If he has something to say, he says it. That's what gives it its character. There is no other litmus test, and there shouldn't be, other that whatever he feels like putting up.

If you don't like it, read some other blog.

TLB,

Get over your cynicism. It may be a long road to recovery, it's not impossible. You really have trouble believing that three white women over 50 could find this blog? I caught the last couple of minutes of this speach on CSPAN and had to dig up the rest of it on the net. I am sure others are doing the same. I was also moved to tears before, well before reading your insensitive remarks. You are to too cynical to believe what category of Americans I belong to, so I will leave that out. Suffice it to say that we Obama supporters are all set to shatter every petty pre-conceived notion you have about America and Americans.

May God bless you with the ability to hope again.

i am a 49 year old white woman with tears in my eyes and hope in my heart. what a powerful speech. one of these days soon Obama will close the deal!

Report type: bug
Level: urgent
URL(s): marcambinder.theatlantic.com
Description: program is malfunctioning. should select different ages/races/socioeconomic ranges, but only selects tearful white women around 50 years. starting to embarrass us. work on randomization immediately.

I saw the speech with segments on CNN (Ballot Bowl). I wonder if someone will compare his vision to that of the two Clintons (she in NY and he in SC or GA)?

I see that drudge has a link to ABC interview where Obama is feeling he is running against two Clintons.

Yes. Yes. Finally. Justice. Now I hope all in the Media cover this.

The power of the two Clintons to agressive bait America (with race, gender, and ethnicity).

I want to make this clear. I am an immigrant (Asian) and I have been for Obama as President since last MLK weekend. I believe in him totally.

I have bled for Clintons in 1990s. But, now I know how much they used me. I will never vote for the two Clintons. Never. Twice was a punishment enough.

to tlb

unfortunately I am over 50-- don't know the othe posters --

not a grandmother - and make a lot more than you do probably--

telling the truth isn't that tough --

others should try it

Great speech! Where's Video?

He might be the politician with the best, soaring, inspiring oratory since Adolf Hitler got emotional, 50-year old German women's hearts all a twitter.

Reporter at the time: "Don't you ladies and college students want to know Herr Hitler's programs, how exactly he plans to solve Germany's problems?"

Ach! That he inspires us so is reason enough! I have bought a phonograph of Adolf so I may listen as I do household tasks. Each promise to the Volk, his saying he cares...fills my heart up with a warm glow..

How can this speech move so many people out of the goodness of thier hearts to slam and bad mouth the Clintons.
Today in the New York Times Style section there was an article about the three young men who write all Obama's speeches. One of them is the one who wrote "they said this night would never come" and the whole rest of the Iowa speech. So he paid these staff guys to write a powerful speech and he made the speech this morning to get votes, to say my followers are righteous and I am righteous and thus by omission those who do not follow me are less righteous.
He's getting votes. His speech writers work until three in the morning and get up at 5 or 6 am according to the article: one hasn't had 6 hours of sleep a night in months: sounds less like a movement than a sweatshop.
Making speeches to get votes. It is not a movement: it is a campaign. Dean and Jerry Brown and Ross Perot and anderson all claimed it was a move,ment too: its a campaign.
Obama said join me on this march but its not a march: he's not marching anywhere: its his campaign to get him elected.
No matter how good a speech it is his is a campaign like these other campaigns. Using the language from the civil rights movement is confusing and manipulative and devisive.
Its not the civil rights movement. His supporters are no more down trodden than Hillary's people: they can pretend all they want but it is a campaign.

I've done an analysis of the Republican delegate race and what could happen in the remaining states. This nomination looks like it's definitely McCain's to lose... but it was interesting to map out on a spreadsheet and see where the important contests are likely to be.

I predict McCain will have a strong February 5th and then wrap things up on March 4th in Texas and Ohio. If Romney is doing better than expected, it could make Pennsylvania on April 22nd pretty important.

Here's the link to my analysis:

http://electopundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/republican-delegate-race.html

I've also done the Democratic race:

http://electopundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/democratic-delegate-race.html

Senator Obama's speech is on C-Span. Just watched it. Check C-Span online and it should say when they will run it again. I almost cried when watching it. To think that this country might choose another Clinton over this great man who could bring this country together. I am so sick of the Clintons and their dirty politics. Sick of it. And by the way, Senator Obama writes all of his own speeches. He hired one young man shortly after the campaign started, but he writes most all of his speeches. You can't take that away from him like the Clintons are stealing everything else from him. This is a man of honesty and great character who will make a wonderful president.

I am a 58 year old white woman. I read Barach Obama's "Audacity of Hope" when it first was published in 2006. I was so impressed with this man and what he stood for that I spoke to anyone who would listen! I said then and I will say now, Barach Obama is the person we all need to bring us together and to give meaning to the word "United" in the United Sates of Amercia!
Since I was a child, I dreamed of a day when people would look past differences and see that we all had something in common and that we all had the same needs, wants and desires. It isn't about you, it isn't about me, it's about all of us working togther!

It wasn't just his words in this speach but the positive comments here and understandings that brought tears to this lady's eyes!

I am tired of the Clintons and the dirty politics they stand for. I just wonder if the people are ready for a man like Obama or if they want to continue on a road of decay.

ElectoPundit: Back and Forth Could Help Obama
http://electopundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/one-back-and-forth-dynamic-that-could.html

Many are trying to envision where this Democratic campaign could be headed. The most common theme and most consistent message from voters so far seems to be this: we like both of these candidates for various reasons, and we want to consider them carefully and on our own terms... don't pressure us into taking one of them before we're ready and if you do, we'll vote for the underdog.

This campaign could be divided into three phases until now. There was the "Clinton frontrunner" phase up until just before Iowa, and then after Iowa the 2nd phase was the very short "Obama Frontrunner" phase. After New Hampshire it was perhaps a "dead heat, no frontrunner" phase that I think may now be ending. If we're back into a "Clinton frontrunner" phase again... what does that mean for the campaign? Will Hillary and Bill wither under the spotlight?

Look at the behavior of the voters so far:

Everyone said if Hillary won Iowa, it was over, they voted for Obama.

Everyone said if Obama won New Hampshire, it was over, they voted for Clinton.

The Clintons and the media tried to say Obama should win Nevada because the culinary union was pressuring members, the members felt the pressure and they resisted, they voted for Clinton.

So where is that conventional wisdom/media dialogue going decisively after Nevada? I think the current line is: "the Clintons are inevitable, Obama may win in South Carolina, but that's just the African-American vote, she's going to win big on February 5th." There's going to be two and a half weeks of this dialogue again in the press for the first time since before Iowa. If Obama had won Nevada and South Carolina, the "dead heat" phase would have continued. But Nevada shifts that, and I think this has significant potential to swing the race back in Obama's favor.

One thing is clear, the focus for the next two weeks will be on Hillary Clinton, what type of presidency she would have, what Bill's role would be, their marital issues, etc. February 5th will now fundamentally be a referendum on her and it could be a decision too big for either candidate to come back from as they have had the ability to do so far in this campaign.

Democratic Delegate Race: http://electopundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/democratic-delegate-race.html

Republican Delegate Race: http://electopundit.blogspot.com/2008/01/republican-delegate-race.html

I confess-I;m almost 58 years old, white, married and childless. And despite approaching senility, I managed to find this "obscure" blog on the Internets! Obama's speech today brought tears to my eyes. For the Clintons to engage in search-and destroy tactics on this man is dispicable and unforgivable. Their lust for power is disgusting, and dare I say, Rovian!

obama's lust for power is blinding. The man has missed way too many votes since entering the Senate, and he hasn't even held a hearing for the committee he chairs.

Hillary has actually been far more hard working than him in the Senate and far more moderate.

Obama's speechwriters are just using language from the Civil Rights movement to transform his simple political campaign into some POWERFUL historical moment. Too bad when he actually has to speak for himself in a debate, he mutters, mumbles and stutters all over himself.

AS for DIVISIVENESS. How about Jesse Jackson Jr., Obama's campaign co-chair? Wondering whether Senator Clinton cried for Katrina.

Make no mistake about it, after his surprising New Hampshire loss, with South Carolina approaching, he went back to his Rezko peddling Chicago hardball politics and tried to exploit an inarticulate statement.

Its called Karma and it his blind ambition without any work ethic will come back to haunt him.

It is undeniably true that Dr. King's civil rights victories were not just about one race. What is the shame is that other minorities do not often understand how what this man did for us all is making their lives easier today.

Hillary could never deliver such an incredible speech. And comes off as too selfish to want to.

The Clintons threw their black support under the bus to win. We must walk away from them both.

Obama, you are the correct man for these times. You are more than words, you are heart and passion. Nothing proceeds without teamwork. You have the vision to create a Team America.

If We are able to deliver your chance.

"power speech-making?"

it's not just the strength of the deliver marc. it's the quality of intelligence and deep insights that got communicated and what it shows about the person saying it. if someone said something to you that blew you away, do you say, "wow, good speech?" or do you think, "pretty smart guy." obama's an intelligent guy who says very smart things that also inspire hopefulness and a sense of unity among a wide variety of people.

you and others seem to get caught up in the hoopla about obama and forget to engage with the sharp, deep intelligence that's reflected in the words.

Obama all the way to White House!

Here is the video link of his speech at MLK church:

http://www.c-span.org/ and look under recent programs.

Enjoy it is great speech.

That is an amazing speech. Amazing. Ignore al the contrary voices, who can be snide after listening or reading that speech. Pass it around, it is simply amazing.

Obama is the best candidate for the presidency, the best candidate in a long time we have seen.

Maybe rosie should ask HRC why a politician is giving a speech in a church...she's in NY after visiting Bill's neighborhood Harlem church giving her own.

TLB...perhaps we women are feeling compelled to state our gender and age as we are prime Clinton meat...her base.

I personally want to do what I can to show other women that voting for a woman without thought for the future of our children's country is a wrong move.

I want a woman in the White House to be sure. But more I do want a dynasty, in particular one that is so willing to unleash the dogs the way they have. I want a woman who has no question about how she got where she is. I want a woman who would never think of pulling the gender card as that sets back women's equality to when I started my own climb.

I want a woman...I just don't want this one. I want, more than a woman, a bright and safe future for my daughter and her children.


BTW...all you other old white women, is there anywhere for all of us to post where we can talk to other women with our ideas? ;0


"We can no longer afford to build ourselves up by tearing someone else down. We can no longer afford to traffic in lies or fear or hate." Barack Obama

Vote hope, not fear. Vote unite, not divide and conquer.

I am a 26 year old gay black man and I think Obama is a sell out. The man can give a speech. However, one line about homophobia doesn't change the fact that in October his Concert for Change was headlined by a virulent homophobe and his campaign resorting to picking a white guy to "represent" the gay community. Would have been nice for him to speak about extending civil rights to gay couples.

I'm another from the over-50 woman baby boomer group who's supposed to be Hillary Clinton's natural constituency, and in fact I had been a Hillary supporter last year, but now I will never be voting for the Clintons.

Their behavior has been inexcusable, the suppression of get-out-the vote efforts in New Hampshire, that attempt to sue to shut down caucus locations in Nevada, the closing of caucus doors half an hour early to disenfranchise Obama voters, all this on top of the less-than-subtle race-baiting by the Clintons against Obama (and they have the nerve to accuse him of playing the race card, when it's been them all along), and even trying hard to stop Iowa college students from voting?

And now, this talk about how the Clinton campaign has been trying to hack the South Carolina touch-screen voter machines? Normally I would doubt claims along these lines, but it says something about the repugnance of the Clinton campaign's tactics so far, that this claim even has so much credibility.

Bill Clinton is also making an embarrassment of his status as a former President. Ex-Presidents are supposed to be senior statesmen and inspire respect, which George H.W. Bush did do, letting his son run his own campaign.

Yet Bill Clinton is involved in the most sordid style of campaigning. And he's doing this at taxpayer expense, since his Secret Service detail as an ex-President follows him everywhere!

I can never support this campaign, and I won't vote for the Clintons at any point, in any primary or in a general election. I'd much prefer to have McCain as President but checked by a Democratically-led Congress. The Clintons need to show some respect for the country and our democracy as a whole, and step aside.

Oh BTW, I have been a feminist myself ever since college days, but I cannot believe that so many feminists consider Hillary Clinton to be a representative for us. She is the spouse of a former President who has been aggressive in her campaign and has been grabbing the headlines himself. IOW, Hillary is desperately attempting to use her husband's coattails to help herself. Does this sound like an icon of independent accomplishment by women? Much better to elect a woman such as Janet Napolitano or Claire McClaskill to the Presidency. Either of them would be much better than Hillary, and would be strong candidates and strong leaders in many different respects.

Obama is good at giving speeches. That is all he is good at.

If you give him his papers more than 3 seconds before he goes on stage he loses them.

If you give him more visits to the state, more field offices, and more union support he still blows Nevada.

If you give him a 10 point lead with 2 days to go in NH, he starts his touchdown dance on the 10 yeard line and fumbles on the 3 yard line. Another blown state for Obama.

Charlotte,

Newsflash:


Janet Napolitano or Claire McClaskill are NOT RUNNING for the Presidency.

This sure helps bury the Chicago Sun Times story linking Obama yet again with the Rezko trial about to begin. He continues to claim he didn't do anything special for Rezko, but has decided to donate another $40,000 in funds from 4 years ago! We also now know about a U. S. Senate internship for the son of a Rezko business partner subsequent to Rezko's recommendation.

its so sad to see some comments that discredit Obama's character...it is a sad sad world...here he is speaking of UNITY one America and nobody seem to get it...STOP the CRITICIZING SERIOUSLY!!HE WILL make a great PRESIDENT!i just HOPE that people will begin to come to their senses and reject this DYNASTY coalition of Bush and the CLINTONS!!Im so tired

TLB I mentioned my gender,age and race because I wanted to emphasize that not all older white females support Hillary Clinton. It disturbs me that any woman would vote for another woman just because she is a woman. I liked Bill's politics but I think he is morally bankrupt, and his actions now are turning him into a sham. Sad, really. I would not vote for Hillary Clinton if she were the only woman on Earth. I do not make my political decisions by my gender, or my race, or my age. I am looking for integrity, intelligence, judgement, right values, moral fortitude, the right vision for America. The 'issues' are basically the same across the dem. candidates, but I like his health care and his education plans better than the others too, and in any case, Barack Obama stands way above the rest in character.

First to TLB or what ever you call yourself for your information I happen to be a teenage black male who has his head square on his shoulders and does his research before he says something which is what you should do (try it ,it works). Barrack Obama is the only presidential canadate to have opposed this ridiculus war.actually he is the only democratic canadate to have been firm on all his issues so far. And about what you said about Ambinder not being a real reporter.Listen here hot shot, you need to understand one thing this is not your page or your little incredibely confused "billary" clinton groupies page.This is Ambinder's page so he can put what ever the heck he wansts to and doesnt make him any less of a reporter. if you had such a problem with it go make your own page.i have written many papers on this election ( at least 10) and im in 8th grade. all im saying is if your so big and bad try me respond with some smart allecy remark. NOW Im done with TLB \

Greetings from the Mamta(lovely) Childcare Trust(MCCT), Nepal with grace and peace to you in lord Jesus. I am very glad to sharing with you about my vision and my works here in Nepal. I am working in Nepal for the poor and orphanage children since 2004.we have kind "Mamta(lovely) Childcare Trust" which is registered in the Nepal's government as well as in the social welfare council. we have providing all physical and spritual needs for the 16 orphanage and poor children.All the children are very lovely and happy in our trust. I am really very happy to serving for these helpless,homeless and hungry children.For the details about me and MCCT, Please ! please !! visit our website: www.mcct.org.np and read our vision for Nepalese homeless and hopeless children.....

I hope to hearing with the blessing reply from you soon!!

In His love,

Misheal pariyar[Director]
Mamta childcare Trust,
G.P.O. 8975, E.P.C.2446
Kathmandu, Nepal
www.mcct.org.np

childcaretrust_smm@enet.com.np
Tel:0977-1-5544832/ mobile:9851068248