« Hillary Clinton Tapes A Letterman's Cold Opener | Main | AtlantiCam: Gordon Fischer Interview »

Obama's Closing Argument: He's Superman, Baby.

02 Jan 2008 10:56 am

Location: a parishioner's room at a methodist church in Indianola, Iowa.

Crowd size
: about 500, with some overflow.

Press contingent: 25 members of the traveling press corps and about 20 walk-ups.

Celebrity guest
: Superman... Brandon Routh.

Length of speech: about 50 minutes.

Applause lines: 14

Standing ovations: there were no chairs.

Interesting lines:

"I have experienced rooted in the real lives of people."

"I don't need lectures on how to bring about change because I've been doing it all my life."

"I don't want to pit red America against blue America; I want to lead the United States of America."

"I am the only Democratic candidate who is beating every single one of them...Fred, Mitt, Mike, Rudy, John... I beat them all."

"This is not just an argument about the meaning of change; it's an argument about the meaning of hope."

"We ran a positive campaign. We rejected the politics of slash-and-burn."


First impression: For thirty minutes, Obama argues. He defends. defends the rational for his campaign, he defends, his defends his decision to run, his defends his view of change, the way he's run his campaign. He rebuts. He blanches. He scrunches his eyes in mock annoyance. He's sardonic. For thirty minutes, the first thirty minutes, he answers two questions: why he is running and why what his opponents say about him is just plain silly. The second question intrudes on the first. Moments turn into minutes. Obama complains about what his opponents - -other Democrats -- allegedly say about him -- and the crowd is silent.

The second half of the speech is a revelation.

Obama borrows the best lines from his inaugural campaign speech in Illinois and the best red meat from his sensational Jefferson-Jackson day speech. He's hopeful, tender, and spot on. He weaves history with message; he wakes up the crowd and ends strongly.

There is less criticism of John Edwards than you might think after reading news coverage about his recent speeches; his references to a 527 group operating on Edwards's behalf are fleeting, unspecific, and probably inconsequential. Probably, Obama feels compelled to point this out -- probably, the audience has no idea what he is talking about because there's been so little coverage of the issue in the local press.

I've put together a representative five minutes of his speech... sorry for the jumpy video.

Comments (26)

There is less criticism of John Edwards than you might think after reading news coverage about his recent speeches; his references to a 527 group operating on Edwards's behalf are fleeting, unspecific, and probably inconsequential. Probably, Obama feels compelled to point this out -- probably, the audience has no idea what he is talking about because there's been so little coverage of the issue in the local press.

Welcome to reality, Marc. Obama's supposed attacks on Edwards, unions, lawyers, Al Gore, and cute fuzzy kittens were never more than a bunch of disgruntled Edwards-backing liberal bloggers hyperventilating over nothing. Fortunately no one pays attention to liberal bloggers anyway, so no harm done.

IF obama is leading than IOWANS are looking mighty foolish!!!they fell for the oprah sake oil and now the country will judge!

WHEN OBAMA DID SHOW UP TO VOTE IN SENATE HE VOTED EXACTLY AS CLINTON DID! WHERES THE UNBIASED MEDIA!.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/29/comparison_of_hillary_and_obama_votes_on_iraq

By Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld | bio
Since the comparison of the Iraq positions over the years of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is one of the hottest issues of the campaign, we thought it would be useful to post a comprehensive comparison of all of their votes on everything relating to the Iraq war.

So here it is: A massive compilation of Iraq-related bills — and the votes by Hillary and Obama on them, side by side — beginning in early 2005, when Obama first joined the Senate.

Of the total of 69 votes we compiled — some significant, some not — it turns out that the two differed on only one. You'll see that one in bold on our chart. But let us be clear: We are not posting this to suggest that their earlier difference at the start of the war — their most important difference — should in any way be overshadowed by these similarities. For many, that difference will remain paramount — for good reason. We just wanted to add factual grist to what is but one component of the debate.

As you can see, Clinton and Obama have voted the opposite way on only one vote on our list: The confirmation of General George Casey to be Chief of Staff for the Army, held just this past February. Hillary voted against confirmation, while Obama voted to confirm.

Additionally, please don't hold it against us if we missed any important votes. No agenda here, readers. If we did, let us know, and we'll add it immediately. Herewith, our full chart of Iraq votes after the jump.

If you are considering Obama, PLEASE research! Your county deserves better that a player like obamawinphrey!

I think it’s a big mistake to believe that obama will win because older Americans will not come out in bad weather to support another candidate like Hillary or Edwards! I’m 67 yr old mixed race man and I can tell you that the older generation is wide awake and very much realizes we need the experience and not a snake oil salesman that needs a TV talk show host to get noticed, obama is just yelling with no substance. Its obvious in EVERY debate he kept losing his thoughts in the middle of making one, (pay attention to all the “ahhs” and “umms” he says between words, sign he doesn’t know what he’s talking about because he can't remember what is “written for him”(not a leader) he’s running on Hillary and Edwards solutions. Notice also, once the media has begun to report his short comings, oprah is no where in sight, feeling pretty foolish at this point id imagine.

He did not show up to vote in the senate often in his short time there, missed 130 votes out of 153! bashes ALL the other 72 senators who voted for the war based on the intelligence they were provided by OUR PRESIDENT, but he will not answer any reporter on how we would voted at the time. But his record after fact shows he supports the war, voted twice in 2006 against bringing America's troops back home. He votes for war appropriations giving our money to Halliburton and Blackwater. His latest bit of posturing S 433 allows the Bush Administration to suspend any troop withdrawal!!!!Which if not suspended, still keeps the troops in Iraq for a long time to come? Obama when faced with tough choices always gave in to pressure from the Bush administration or corporate lobbyists. Such as Obama voted for Bush's energy bill, sending more than $13 billion in subsidies and tax breaks to oil, coal, and nuclear companies. Obama voted with Republicans to allow credit card companies to raise interest rates over 30 percent, increasing hardship for families. Obama voted for one of Bush's top priorities - expanding Nafta to South America - even as President Bush obstructed all the top Democratic priorities. Obama voted with Bush to make it harder for ordinary people to hold big corporations accountable when they do things like sell toxic toys, poisonous pet food, or just plain rip you off. Obama was the Senate's biggest Democratic advocate of subsidies for liquid coal, even though liquid coal produces twice the global warming pollution of the crude oil it's meant to replace (Obama "backed off" this position after being pummeled by environmentalists for several months, but still voted for increased subsidies, albeit with conditions)Obama, a Hamiltonian believer in free trade and supporters of globalization has lent his support to the "Hamilton Project formed by corporate-neoliberal Citigroup chair Robert Rubin and other 'Wall Street Democrats' to counter populist rebellion against corporate tendencies within the Democratic Party. Obama provided assistance to pro-war candidates (such as Joe Lieberman). Obama voted for "business-friendly 'tort reform' bill that rolls back working peoples' ability to obtain reasonable redress and compensation...from corporations!!! Obama considers single payer universal health care too socialist and has stated that he prefers voluntary solutions. He has no substance. He has provided no solution to any problem until Hillary, Edwards or even Mitt Romey publically expresses theirs, then he copies, He’s been constantly negative with everyone.

Early on supporters were mad that race was initially talked about, but they insisted it wasn’t fair that he isn’t BLACK he is MIXED RACE! I highly recommend you check out his church websitehttp://www.tucc.org/about.htm. "I'm a black guy running for president named Barack Obama. I must be hopeful." said obama in a speech in Iowa.
Now he’s claims hes just BLACK again trying to make fools of black voters. I have no respect for a man that is ashamed of his heritage and his parents. An ex-drug addict (per his words JUNKIE) that’s not someone who smoked pot, inhaled or not, a junkie is a person who had a serious addiction to harsher drugs. I do not trust he won’t fall backwards and start using again. In fact doesn’t his wife always look wired???? Makes you say hum…Is that the type of person you trust your great country too. He is a disgusting example for our youth. Michelle proves she is racist with every sentence she speaks. The younger ones who you claim only support obama have not gone through the problems with health care, the cost of prescriptions, struggling to pay home loans insurances and frankly keeping a job. Per polls young obama supporters live at home or on campus and have no idea what’s really at stake with our country, but when he cannot handle foreign policies and they find themselves drafted! they will feel mighty stupid! I suggest that the young and old voters RESEARCH before you vote it’s very important. Look how bush/Chaney destroyed the country that BILL CLINTON left behind, no debt, we had jobs and the housing markets were moving forward. I URGE ALL TO GET INFORMED BEFORE YOU CAST THAT IMPORTANT VOTE; YOUR FUTURE DEPENDS ON IT!

Aggghhh! Obama is Hitler! My goldfish are screaming at me and my brains are falling out!!!1 Aggghhh! Aggghh!!!

IOWA REPUBLICAN MAYOR SWITCHED TO DEMOCRAT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!!

This guy is amazing, getting a well respected republican to vote for him. End the age of polorization, no more devide and conquer, unite a country, unite a nation, turn red and blue into purple - VOTE OBAMA and change a country.


EXCLUSIVE! Mayor Rickard to vote for Obama
BY GERSH KUNTZMAN
The Brooklyn Paper
Enlarge this image


BROOKLYN, IOWA — The longtime Republican mayor of this tiny heartland town will stun his neighbors — and send shockwaves that will reach his countrymen in the real Brooklyn — when he breaks ranks with the GOP to vote for Sen. Barack Obama at the Iowa caucuses this Thursday night.
“After eight years of this administration, I’ve had it,” Mayor Loren Rickard told The Brooklyn Paper, which sent a reporter to Brooklyn, Iowa — population 1,200 — for the “first-in-the-nation” caucus.

“We’ve got a currency that’s practically worthless and a war without end,” he added. “I thought they were crazy to start the war with Iraq — and crazier that they didn’t even seem to have a plan to fight it.”

And Rickard said he’s not only dissatisfied with the president, but with his would-be successors.

“I’ve been a moderate Republican all my life and I simply don’t recognize these people [the GOP field],” he said. “Meanwhile, the Democrats have six solid candidates — though I think [Dennis] Kucinich is a bit out there.”

Rickard singled out Joe Biden and Obama for praise — but said he wouldn’t back Biden because “he can’t win.”

Few in the farming town in eastern Iowa know that their third-term Republican mayor will side with the Democrats on Thursday. And it might not have happened were it not for the efforts of Obama supporter, Bev Rens.

“I held a house party for Obama and [the mayor] came with his son, Joel,” said Rens, the Poweshiek County Democratic Party co-chair. “He listened to what I had to say and he pledged to vote for Obama that night. It sent a shiver through me!”

Rens said she also scored the mayor’s son, who was originally backing New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.

The Republican crossovers were no surprise to Brooklyn (Iowa) Chronicle Editor Sky Eilers.

“There are many Republicans in Iowa who feel that their party is in trouble in November, but they also don’t want to see Hillary be president, so they’re switching parties to back other Democrats,” said Eilers. “Hillary has had the biggest machine behind her here. Some people feel she’s buying her way through the process while Obama is appealing to the grassroots, which is what you have here in Brooklyn.”


Eilers didn’t think Rickard’s betrayal of party would send a shockwave through the town.

“Shockwave? In Brooklyn [Iowa]? I don’t think so,” Eilers said.

But he did think many eyes would be following Rickard as he entered the Democratic, rather than Republican, caucus.

“He is very well respected here, so people will certainly talk about it,” he said.

Under Iowa election law, registered voters can switch their party affiliation on caucus night, which Rickard said he would do by signing in as a Democrat at Thursday’s gathering at the Brooklyn-Guernsey-Malcolm elementary school.

Despite the excitement over the presidential election, the caucus process in Brooklyn is subdued, Rens said. In some years, only a handful of Democrats and Republicans have gathered, she said.

“I started in 1988 and was caucusing for Jesse Jackson,” she said. “There was six or seven people there, total.”

But this year, turnout is expected to be high at both party caucuses. The Republicans will gather at 6:30 pm and begin with a straw poll of all voters in attendance, while Democrats start a half-hour later — and dig in for an arduous process.

First, supporters of each candidate get to make a presentation, hoping to sway the undecided. Then, a vote is taken. Candidates who receive 15 percent or more are considered “viable,” and move forward to a second round of voting. Supporters of “non-viable” candidates can shift their allegiance to one of the viable candidates or form alliances with supporters of other “non-viable” candidates before the second round.

Goodness, Anti-Obama Guy!!! Put down the Starbucks!

My argument about showing up for Senate votes and campaigning for the Presidency is the same for all the current Democratic candidates that are senators... so what? So, let's say Obama, or Clinton, showed up for a vote they might have otherwise missed while campaigning. Great! So the Democrats get 52 instead of, say, 50 votes. Still not a supermajority, which is the way the Republicans are playing it.

It's just a silly argument, really. Senate Democrats could "lose" a vote by two fewer Senators. No big whoop.

Oprah sake oil sounds delicious (I'm a sucker for Asian cuisine)

Marc,

Do you ever write anything good about Senator Obama. Your writings over last few months have clearly been biased. I only come to your link to get to other links.

I sat through an Obama speech in L.A., and the only reason I drove there (and biked the last bit) was with one thing in mind: asking him a question.

I really can't imagine someone being so much of a hack that they think that simply offering a recount of what he said is acceptable.

Even a little kid asked Obama a more difficult question than the MSM.

Maybe that kid could get his friends together and they could do the job the MSM refuses to do.

This is pretty interesting…

Hillary Clinton’s Recent Meteoric Rise in Wealth Pictorial Graph
http://thememlingindex.com/hillary_clinton_net_worth-wealth.html

You astroturf folks crack me up.

Mark, I ate Cheerios for breakfast this morning. Why didn't you eat the exact same cereal as me this morning - Cheerios? Why are you so biased against Cheerios? Even my five-year old little brother eats Cheerios. You are a hack; you don't like Cheerios. I am through with you.

Astroturf and bitter basement dwellers. Is there anyone left at Hillary's side? I knew they would start bailing out the second it appeared that their genius was actually fallible, and that "invincibility" is actually NOT a good internet strategy, it's a meme.

No offense to true believers , but my interaction with the members of Hillary's campaign left me thinking they are all your typical "I'm a winner , I back the winner" types , arrogant and smarmily condescending to anyone who did not attend an Ivy League school or hails from outside the beltway. Their general mishandling of the press ( the queen will not talk to you, churl) belies a campaign long on attitude and short on depth.

Basically, these are the guys who purchased a term paper because they knew the material, and writing one was beneath them.

I'm sure Friday's spin will go "Iowa wasn't that important to us"

OBAMA GAMES/LIES,
Great name,idiot. You're probably one of Hillary/Edwards's henchmen.However, you could at least show Obama some respect. This is a guy who happens to be smarter than you and whoever you're ranting for.He's a sitting U.S. for crying out loud.As far as your drug references are concerned, I hope you felt the same way about Bush.Then, again, you're probably one of those republican/nut somewhere out in the boondocks, who have nothing to contribute to this country, but racist venom just like Hillary has done.You should remove your hood and let everyone see you, but I'm sure you're a coward as all bigots are.Don't forget to read your bible today.

Go Hillary Go!

You are the only chance we Republicans have at a shot at the White House.

mmmmm.... juicy, lip-smacking, deviciousness!

Help. I fear HRC/Clinton Attack Machine. They were good on Charlie Rose, Hardball, chasing Register editors, getting NYT to bury their problems, etc.

These last hours are important. Channel your energy to Obama. Let him win. For us, for future citizens, for planet earth.

PASSITIONALELY SUPPORT OBAMA

TOTALLY WITH DISDAIN REJECT CLINTON

OBMA LIAR!
What's your point? I guess you're an Edwards/Fake/Phony voter.Hillary and Obama are night and day, with Obama representing day. She's the 90s and we don't need to go back there.Besides, she has nothing to do with change. As matter of fact her name and change should not be in the same sentence.I almost failed to mention those racist slurs she's leveled at Obama. There goes the black vote, I hope.
As far as Edwards is concerned, he's the most phony of the candidates, including Romney.His contrived populism just stinks. There's nothing in his past that points to his standing up for the poor and against corporations.On the contrary, he used to charge tons of money to give speeches on poverty and was a hedge fund pirate.When he was in the senate, he always voted with the lobbyists and in favor of corporations.As a matter of fact, he and Hillary now have plenty of interest groups spending millions in Iowa and elsewhere in order to influence the electoral process.Obama is the antidote to those perennial losers.And I can't wait to help him prove just that.

Why are the Hillary fans seeming to be so racist? (ex. "RL" at 12:03pm)

Is anybody else having trouble with the video? I can't see more than 5 seconds into it. Then again, it might be because I'm in China right now behind the Great Firewall.

Mike Hickerson wrote, "I'm sure Friday's spin will go 'Iowa wasn't that important to us.'"

Exactly, Mike. In fact, wasn't that the whole point of sending Clinton surrogate and Ohio Governor Ted Strickland out to tell the world how "undemocratic" and "undeserving" Iowa is?

Definitely pre-gaming the post-caucus spin.

OBAMA GAMES/LIES has been carpetbombing that same entry all day. Nice to see you again. Say hi to Hillary for me!

The hysterical "bad, bad Obama" posts crack me up.

I smell desperation.

I just got called on the daily zogby tracking poll and one of the Ron Paul student canvassers just rang my doorbell. Poor guy - it is freezing but he seemed happy. He didn't mind when I said I'd be caucusing for Obama. I don't think he had a warm enough coat on. They need to give these guys Parkas if they are sending them out today.

Hmmm, whoever was holding that camera must have had a really good new year's eve.

Obama Superman?.. he may be Superman to ardent supporters.....
however the Kinks understand

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M6SO4EKBNc

By the way..
There should not be the assumption that petty juvenile remarks attacking any candidate come from Dems..

Usually juvenile claptrap is the domain of Republicans..think about it..

(at the very least this is a great rock and roll song from a great rock and roll band)

Over a decade ago, I bought into all the Clinton hype. I put my X on the line. I've paid for it ever since. Hillary Clinton doesn't deserve your vote, or anyone else's for that matter. What makes Hillary even more unworthy are the facts surrounding 9-11, that she will neither confirm, nor deny. Unfortunately, no one in politics is obligated to tell the truth. Should you seek it here's a map: http://theseedsof9-11.com

Obama 08 - The first choice of sane Republicans.