« Live Wire The Sage...(live from Charleston, SC) | Main | Coburn To Endorse McCain »

The Dems Debate: Nevada Nice, No News

15 Jan 2008 11:00 pm

Nevada Nice; No News.

Everyone did well; a credit to the Democratic Party and their candidates.

The candidates played in the smaller sandbox very nicely, thank you. They said many nice things about each other as they did drawing distinctions, chiming in at moments to get that last word in about the failures of the Bush Administration. “I really commend Barack for taking on
the full range… etc.)

Both Clinton and Obama needed the racial paroxysm to end; both were eloquent and seemed genuinely interested in calming their supporters down. Fortunately for Obama, his conciliatory manner reflected his campaign message very nicely.

Clinton’s acceptance of Bob Johnson’s clarification statement will raise eyebrows – the guy was clearly referring to something that wasn’t activism – but Obama did not want to press the point.
All three of the candidates seemed comfortable with their stations; there was much less jockeying for ideological space than usual.

The sparks flew when the debate turned to local issues.

Clinton got the better of an exchange on Yucca Mountain, making sure to drive home the point that John Edwards twice voted in favor of the nuclear waste repository. NBC made sure that Obama was held to account for his record, asking about his vote for the 2005 energy bill, for instance, and even about scurrilous e-mails claiming he’s a Muslim. To Obama’s credit, he did not pander or shy away from his possible support for nuclear power, provided it could be generated safely and cleanly. Clinton had a few other jabs at the ready, calling the ’05 energy bill, which Obama supported, the “Dick Cheney energy bill…” and said of renewable energy, “it’s not going to happen by hoping for it.” She won these exchanges on points, in part because her tone was measured, and in part because the moderators did not give Obama the chance to respond.

Barack Obama seems very comfortable talking about real people and their real issues. As he’s done more of these debates, he’s been able to sound more like a father and less like a law professor. The ratio between ethereal talk and issue talk was about 50/50 for him. Hillary Clinton had a fine night; her ration was about 80 parts issue to 20 parts message; John Edwards, as usual, had the clearest message and tried to distinguish himself from his opponents , but he was tripped up on nuclear fuel and Yucca Mountain. Some of his answers were unusually treacly.

Tim Russert points out that all the Dems no longer favor more federal restrictions on gun control.... HRC changed her mind from '00...

<------------->

Obama gets the line of the night: asked whether Hispanic voters have a hard time voting for black candidates, Obama said; "Not in Illinois. They all voted for me."


<------------>
HRC calls the '05 energy bill, which Obama supported, as "the Dick Cheney energy bill."

On Yucca:

HRC notes she opposed it from 2001...

Obama notes he opposes it...

HRC jabs at Obama's corporate patron "Exelon"...

Notes that "John was in favor of it twice..."

Edwards: "I've heard Sen. Obama say he is open to the subject of nuclear power...I am not for it or agnostic..I am against it."

HRC: "Well, but John, you did vote for Yucca Mountain twice."

Edwards; "The science that has been revealed since this time..and the forged documents....have revealed that this thing does not make sense."


<------------>

Clinton: Harvard, other schools "should not do anything which disrespects" students who want to serve in the military.... Obama says he would favor mandate requiring schools to accept ROTC programs as a condition of federal aid.

<--------->
Obama campaign sends along:

Edwards was wrong on that health care $$ claim: Clinton Raised More Money From Health Care Professionals Than Obama. Senator Clinton took $1,695,830 from health care professionals. Senator Obama took $1,330,743 from health care professionals. [Center For Responsive Politics, Accessed 1/15/08]


Obama wonders whether Edwards would allow combat troops to go into Iraq combat terrorism.... "as respects Al Qaeda, public enemy number one, I would keep a quick reaction force in Kuwait..."

Obama: "But.."

Edwards: "That is different than keeping troops inside Iraq... combat troops is a continuation of the occupation...."

Obama: "I think there is a distinction without a difference. If it's appropriate to keep that strike force outside of Iraq, that might be preferable. But there is a capacity."

Edwards: "Yes."

<------------>

There's lots of joie de vie tonight on stage...

HRC: "What Barack said is what John and I meant..."

Etc.

Lots of that.

"It's not only George Bush. The Republican candidates running for the presidency are saying things very much in line with George Bush."
<---------->

Candidates get to question each other....
.
Edwards asks Obama: "Do you think people expect something for [donations from phamra and drug companies:]? Obama: "I don't take money from federal lobbyists, I don't take money from PACs. If you've got a mid-level executive at a drug company or insurance company....who is inspired by my message and sends me money, it's recorded as being from those companies...even though there was no organized effort...I'm proud of raising more money from small donors..."

Clinton asks Obama to "join me in doing something. We both very much want to convince President Bush to end the war in IRaq and change direction...appears that not only is he refusing to do that but can enter into an agreement with the Iraqi government without the approval of the US Congress...I think we have to do everything we can to prevent Pres. Bush from binding the hands of the next president....I've introduced legislation to require him to come to the US congress...to get anything [he wants]....I want to Obama whether he will cosponsor my legislation." Obama: "I think we can work on this, Hillary."

<---------->
Clinton says she regrets '02 bankruptcy vote...says she was happy that it never became law and opposed '05 bill....turns to subprime crisis and her plan...."priorities and the values are absolutely wrong."

Seems that, with their mentions, the Dem party rediscovering Asian-Americans tonight....

Obama notes that he opposed the bankruptcy bill in '01 and in '05... a sop to the credit card industry, he says... generally seems more comfortable than usual taking his responses out of the clouds and to the ground..

<--------->
Debate turns to the economy...

Edwards pivots back to his message...

Clinton talks about financial instruments in details...

Obama blames the administration...


<----------->
Brian Williams asks Obama about the Muslim rumors. Yes, really. "In the internet age, there are going to be lies that are spread all over the place. Fortunately, I believe that the American people are smarter than people give them credit for."

Interlude: HRC campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle thanks Michiganders on HRC's behalf:

“Tonight Michigan Democrats spoke loudly for a new beginning. You spoke out for an economy that would honor the middle class, not punish it. You spoke out for a President who will fight to create good paying jobs at a time when so many families are struggling to make ends meet. You spoke out for an end to the war in Iraq. You spoke out for a quality, affordable health care system that works for all Americans. “For that, we thank you. “Your voices matter. And as President, Hillary Clinton will not only keep listening, but will make sure your voice is always heard.”
<---------->

Obama: "He was on time all the time. I'm sure he never lost a paper. What he could not do what he could not do is to listen to perspectives that did not agree with his ideological predispositions....what he could not do is bring people together..."

Pivots to Iraq war.... "Those are the kinds of failures that have to do with judgment, with the capacity to inspire people..."

<------------>

HRC calls Bush "pathetic" for "begging" Saudi sheiks to lower the price of oil....

Russert: Do American people want someone who is an "operating officer?" Obama: "Being president is not making sure that schedules are being run properly or that paperwork is being run effectively. It's involving having a vision for where we want the country to go."

Greatest Strength: Obama: "Ability to bring people together." Obama: "Greatest weakness is...my desk in my office doesn't look good...I've got to have somebody around me who is keeping track of this stuff." Edwards: "Greatest strength: for 54 years I've been fighting with every fiber of my being... [says fight nine times]...." Edwards's weakness: "I sometimes have a very powerful emotional response to people around me." HRC'[s strength: "I am passionately committed to this country and what it stands for.." Weakness: "I get impatient. I get really frustrated when people don't seem to understand that we can do so much more to help each other....I get concerned with pushing further and faster than people are ready to go..."

HRC: "There is a difference...being president is being the chief executive officer. I think you have to be able to manage and run the bureaucracy. You have to pick good people...and have to hold them accountable. And you've seen a president who has failed at that..."
<-------->
NBC's early questions have been almost all process, no substance. Not that I'm complaining...

Letting candidates pivot easily to their stump speeches.... (Good for Edwards....)

A heckler yells about "raced-based questions".....

<--------->

Edwards: "As Hillary noted, I was the son of a mill worker...I do think there are differences on policies and perspectives...

NBC's Natalie Morales:"What is a white male to do running against these historic candidates?"

HRC: "Poor John!"

Edwards; "I do believe that it says really good things about America."

<------------->:

Russert: What happened in New Hampshire? Wilder effect?

Obama: "No."

<------------>

Russert asks HRC whether she'll can Bob Johnson (but he's not a campaign reporter). But Russert says: "drug use as a teenager" in his question....
Clinton says she accepts Johnson's statement...

Candidates strike calming tone....

Clinton: “Neither race nor gender should be part of this campaign. Both have exuberant and uncontrollable supporters…we’re all family…”. Obama: “I think Hillary said it well. Race has always been an issue and in our politics and in our country…one of the premises of my campaign is that we can’t solve these challenges unless we come together as a people.” Edwards bring up Greenville sit-ins…

Comments (43)

Edwards needs a stunner to stay competitive. He can win Nevada.

liveblog...
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Obama is a class act. The question to Edwards about running against a minority and a woman was not fair. Why does this needs to be asked? HRC's comment about "Poor John" was very, very unfair.

Hillary did not tell us anything new. Everyone knows that current president is pathetic.

Why are Hillary and Obama looking so tired??

"Our responsibility to ensure that our children and our grandchildren had a better life than we did." This is the passion in Edwards that keeps me in his camp.

Nice to hear Obama picking up on Edwards's points tonight. The Warren Buffett challenge, for example, is something Edwards has highlighted for quite a while.

Just a reminder. Senator Obama took money from lobbyists and special interest PACs until after he declared for this race. And, did he actually answer the question? What does he think corporate special interests expect for the money they give politicians?

WTF!! -- those numbers are "health care professionals" -- doctors, hospital administrators, nurses as well as health insurance company employees and executives. Good Lord! Health care professionals have widely divergent interests in the health care policy debates and counting them all as somehow sinister special interests is sloppy, sloppy sloppy.

Marc,

HEy, you did not include Obama's reverse jab at HRC. It was a testament of Obama that his contributor knows he is pro-environment. Come one. Let us not peddle HRC.

tom in ma, good catch. the numbers from Obama's camp are unlikely to be the ones Edwards was referring to.

After each oozes sympathy for families at risk of foreclosure, Russert challenges Hillary and Edwards on their support for the harsh 2001 bankruptcy bill. Wide opening for Obama -- the only one to oppose 01 and 05 bills. But he keeps the gloves on. He doesn't hit Hillary on judgment for being for 01 bill before she was against it (voted for it, happy that it didn't pass). I'll say it for him: judgment again, consistency again.

Did you see how after Obama finished responding about drop-outs among minority youth, HRC interrupted or injected to have her say? The moderators agreed. Why? Is her being white female and former first lady allows her to be so crude? She has behaviour problem. What a rude person. I am beginning to dislike her in total sense. I just hope she is not the nominee. But, with the Clinton machine, she will be in the White House for 8-years. I guess some are born to be losers (i.e., me).

in response to the Obama camp's "rebuttal" on the numbers:

The Center for Responsive Politics shows Obama with $116,650 from the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing industry in this cycle, more than any other federal candidate, Democrat or Republican. [Center for Responsive Politics, Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Top Recipients]

Can we go back to that question about what corporate special interest expect for their money?

Nice summary of the debate (written before the debate is over). If I hadn't been watching and only had this summary, I might have thought that John Edwards made a quick cameo appearance.

How is that possible, Marc, that you and I listened to the same 2 hours and yet you have only one take-away regarding Edwards (and it's negative)? On the other hand, I heard Edwards present a strong statement about ending the occupation in Iraq, a clear response to why he is running, and a number of other important points.

I think you discount Edwards' performance too much, Marc.

The reason Obama "got all the votes" in his senate bid was because he ran against Alan Keyes who was a Republican throw away candidate after Obama's real opposition, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race because of revelations contained in his divorce papers. When this happened the Republicans had to find a last minute candidate and Keyes was picked.

To imply or suggest that he got all of those votes on his own merit is simply not true. Anyone can check this story out. Anyone could have won the race against Keyes.

Clinton refuses to say that Obama is ready to be president, and she continues to use references to terrorist attacks in attempts to score political points against Obama. How far we have fallen from "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Now Clinton is in effect saying the only thing we have to fear is her political opponent.

Marc,

I do not agree with Chris Matthews (MSNBC), who implies HRC has won the debate, the nomination and the presidency.

Obama did the best - he was presidential. His answers about Iraq, about drop-outs, etc. were presidential.

Edwards was gutsy.

HRC came in 3rd. She wanted to be seen as a Queen. She succeeded. She even interrupted the moderators when it was not appropriate. She also commented: Poor John. She is flawed, and boorish behaviour.

Democratic Party won today for sure.

Everyone of them looked presidential, were strong on issues and mainly showed that they all are 'feeling the pain' of Americans.

Edwards was strong, solid, on the point all the time.

Obama was consistent and crisp.

Hillary was also steady and strong.

Grandmother wrote: "Anyone could have won the race against Keyes."

I doubt that anyone could've won it with 70% of the vote, as Obama did. Obama also won the Democratic nomination by a huge margin.

Barack Obama by the way is the only candidate for statewide office in Illinois who's ever made it to my small (and very pale) corner of "downstate." And he's come back as a senator too. That says a lot. Don't be so cynical, Grandmother.

Obama did very well tonight, by being straightforward and smart. If Clinton hadn't lost me a long time ago, her plain lie about Robert Johnson would have done the job tonight.

Interesting debate. Largely cordial.

First few questions were terrible. That heckler was dead-on.

Obama had the "line of the night," like you said, but his overall performance was uneven. He was sleepy when he should've been hitting, stupid for bringing up his inability to find papers, and pushy when he realized he was accidentally asking his "one question."

Clinton had a solid showing throughout. A couple of bad moves and obvious panderings to a demographic she sees herself losing (African-Americans), and a few bungled responses, including one where she totally followed Obama on the troop pullout question. But that consistency probably won her the evening, though not in all the ways she was hoping to - Obama really managed to run his "presidential mentality" by her, and that could make a strong difference in NV and SC.

We'll see.

Pundits claiming Hillary won. Please. Obama brought the substance, the style, the humor, and the had a great grasp of the issues and all those pundits know it.

I see we're back to shilling for ol' Hillary, poor battered white woman. Please.

I guarantee the focus groups will go heavily towards Obama and even Edwards.

Marc,

Your write up was actually pretty balanced. I am impressed. I thought that everyone did fine, no game changer here. I think that Obama came accross as the most genuine wheras HIllary and Edwards look like typical pols, but I admit I am biased on that front.

But, hey, good job not overtly shilling for HIllary on this one!

One way that I think Obama might have done himself some good tonight. After the weeks events, your casual voter might have been watching this debate execting Obama to be the foaing-at-the mouth Sharpotonesque caricature that the media and the clinton campaign painted of his over the last few days. What they say instead was an inclusive figure, who notably, said that black men need to be better fathers.

I wonder if your average white voter looked at that moment and said, "You know, this guy doesn't scare me."

I think this might be the dynamic of this debate that most of the MSM commentariat will miss: Obama basically refuted the caraicature of him as a racially divisive figure that HIllary had been peddling.

RKA: I think you got it. I found this performance absolutely superb.

But, I am watching Hardball. There is Rachel, Chris, Pat, and Keith. They all have given the debate to HRC.

I suspect this view may be what NYT, NPR, etc. will have.

Thus, low-education voters (read white women) from low-income households will get their views tomorrow in papers, tv shows, radio stations.

They will continue to think HRC is right and that Obama is lazy or as Chris said: an underling.

I feel sick. But, i was happy when I was watching Obama respond to all questions. HRC rarely responds. She has memorized responses.

In reference to your line of the night, in which Obama exclaimed that all the Hispanics in his state voted for him, the senator's opponent was Alan Keyes!

I agree it's annoying to listen to the fickle pundits, but it really doesn't matter what they think.

The pundits never said Obama won ANY of the 2007 debates and he still won Iowa.

Voters will do what they want at the polls.

Grandmother, tell me, would YOU have won the race against Alan Keyes?

For all the people saying he just beat Keyes, remember that he won 3 State Senate elections prior to that, so he wasn't just talking about that race. He also had to win the primary in that Senate race against tougher opponents.

Grandmother,

Obama also won against Hillary in IA. Thank you.

Obama did ok, but debates about policy is really not his forte. His strength lies in giving a good stump speach.

He had to eat some crow tonight when Russert confronted him with the four page memo sent out by his SC staff calling Hillary and Bill racists. He did it graciously. He learned a lesson. End of story.

Clinton pretty much owned both Edwards and especially Obama. She led the attacks on Bush and they looked flumuxed as they tried to keep up with her. Obama was forced to agree with Hillary to co-sponser a piece of legislation she want to submit to the Senate demanding Bush not tie the next presidents hands in Iraq.

Edwards is very passionate and makes tears come to my eyes every time I hear him speak. But Hillary is just better at policy.

Seems the same old same old are touting their same old same old on their chosen ones in this thread...

I was actually dreading this tonight as Obama has never functioned well in the soundbite arena. But tonight, he reaffirmed for me what drew me to him to begin with...

All his answers were centered on the big picture, and I'm sorry folks that's the job of the Prez. When they were doing the my desk is messy/you need to control all things segment, I could picture perfectly HRC scurrying around trying to micromanage each and every item in the WH while Obama would be gathering the best and brightest around him and trusting them to do the job we hired them for. I can envision HRC micromanaging all viewpoints that she heard while Obama would be calling folks in AND out of government, gathering differing views from which to glean his final approach.

He would make a fine President. She would make a fine Secretary of State. Edwards would make a fine Attorney General.

Vote hope, not fear.

G Davis:
I disagree; can't keep track of a piece of paper? Messy desk? these are strangely poisonous issues. They don't reinforce the vision thing, they create a brand new jerry moonbeam spacey image. Messy desk? who plants the seed of an image of having a messy desk in the oval office? Shot himself in the foot. My people can't hand me a piece of paper until 2 seconds before I need it? shot himself in both feet.
I think this was crazy stuff to say. I love hillary and like Obama but I hate hearing any democrat saying this.

Obama may have looked lackluster in last evenings debate, but he still comes away from Vegas with a prize.

Perhaps because of Barack Obama's vote on the Cheney energy bill, or previous support for Yucca Mtn., or his friendship with Joe Lieberman, the rightwing Las Vegas Review Journal has seen fit to weigh in on the Democratic Caucus in Nevada, and endorse Barack Obama.

The editorial that announced the endorsement also took several shots at John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. Health care and populism are not popular with the rightwing it appears, but Obama is it seems.

From the Review- Journal:

"But Barack Obama is, at least, likeable. He is a good enough orator that there is no need to cringe when he dares to speak off the cuff. He is a good politician, in the non-insulting sense that he knows how to speak to individual Americans and give them the feeling he cares about their concerns.

As Nevada Democrats head to their caucuses Saturday, they might ask themselves whether they really want to spend two months later this year watching a re-run of the horror movie "It Came From Little Rock," with the sound turned up much too loud -- or if they'd rather make it a real contest this fall."

While I disagree with the Review Journal's choice of the best Democratic candidate, I do agree that Obama is likeable and a good orator. However, I think more is required to be President.

The full editorial endorsement:

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/13832767.htm l

Noam Sheiber gets the debate anylysis right:

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/01/16/nevada-debate-thoughts.aspx

I am surpised that someone shared my thoughts posted last night that the time when Obama said black men need to be better fathers was one that will help him with a lot of white voters who were tuning in expecting to see a reincarnation of Al Sharpton.

I am sorry, but when the question was squarely put to her Hillary did not have the courage to own up to the Johnson comments and renounce them. I have absolutely had it with her. Rattling off a bunch of numbers is all well and good, but when you can't even be decent what good does it do? And now Bill is calling Obama the establishment candidate because they did not get the Culinary Workers endorsement. They make me ill. And I voted for them both, both times.

Messy desk. Can't controll details. Needs constant babysitting by staff.

Give Obama a paperclip to play with. He's finished.

How can obama's fans on this blog claim that a right-wing newspaper endorsing obama over thier favorite punching bag - hillary- is a prize?
Commentators last night said nevada dems hate this paper so much that this endorsement is akin to poison.
And in light of John Lewis's comments yesterday in support of Hillary's Johnson remarks, she doesn't need to make any apologies. If he is not backing away from Hillary over MLK JR then it is a non issue.
just because candidates don't say the words you want them to say doesn't mean they lack courage..
Obama has a serious problem in that some of his major support is from hillary and bill haters:
whether it is andrew sullivan or chris matthews or David geffin or the folks who blog here the negativity has begun to seriously overshadow the idea of his being a uniter. He says loud and clear on the debate last night that some of his supporters are over-zealous and this morning they still spout this tired clinton bashing.
How does he run a positive campaign if the folks on the front line blogisphere can't reign in the hate?
Remember they are the same party, the same wing of the party and nearly identical voting records.
Hillary's supporters aren't here everyday saying they won't vote obama if he prevails but obama's people here are ready to vote pro-war republican or stay home.
I have 16 years of love for Hillary but will be proud to vote dem for obama if she does not prevail. I hope the hatred doesn't ruin your health.

How can obama's fans on this blog claim that a right-wing newspaper endorsing obama over thier favorite punching bag - hillary- is a prize?
Commentators last night said nevada dems hate this paper so much that this endorsement is akin to poison.
And in light of John Lewis's comments yesterday in support of Hillary's Johnson remarks, she doesn't need to make any apologies. If he is not backing away from Hillary over MLK JR then it is a non issue.
just because candidates don't say the words you want them to say doesn't mean they lack courage..
Obama has a serious problem in that some of his major support is from hillary and bill haters:
whether it is andrew sullivan or chris matthews or David geffin or the folks who blog here the negativity has begun to seriously overshadow the idea of his being a uniter. He says loud and clear on the debate last night that some of his supporters are over-zealous and this morning they still spout this tired clinton bashing.
How does he run a positive campaign if the folks on the front line blogisphere can't reign in the hate?
Remember they are the same party, the same wing of the party and nearly identical voting records.
Hillary's supporters aren't here everyday saying they won't vote obama if he prevails but obama's people here are ready to vote pro-war republican or stay home.
I have 16 years of love for Hillary but will be proud to vote dem for obama if she does not prevail. I hope the hatred doesn't ruin your health.

To Mike:

The point isn't that Alan Keyes wasn't such a weak candidate, it's that it makes Obama's "line of the night" dishonest.

Obama is claiming Latino support for him in 20045 disproves anti-black racism among Latinos. Well, if you're opponent is 1) Black (arguably "more black" given Obama's parents) and 2) as far-right as the Republicans get, it kind of destroys the argument.

Obama could have hit Hillary for saying she was against the '01 bankruptcy bill after she was for it -- judgment again. He did point out that the bill was heavily lobbied for by credit card industry.

Michael,

First, Hillary never faced meaningful opposition in her NY senate primaries or generals. Obama was a big underdog in the dem primary in 2004. In blue Illinois, it's often not the general that is compeptitive, but the primary. He was running against a self-financed millionaire, Blair Hull, and a strong establishment candidate from an Illinois machine family, Dan Hynes. He started out way behind and ended up winning.

As for the paper endorsment, it is generally a good thing that even right wing republicans see him as the least of all eveils, in their view. It shows that Obama can pick off independents and moderate republicans. He'll never get that rag's endorsement in the general, but the fact that they find him the least problematic does show you that he has some corssover appeal.

As for people not wanting to rally around HIlary should she win. That's her problem, not ours. She chose to get ahead not on the issues, but by race baiting. If people don't rally around her as nominee, she will have no one to blame but herself. She's not entitled to anyone's vote.

Michael C:

I love your earlier comment implying that too many of Obama's supporters have not taken his message of unity to heart, blinded as they seem to be by Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

Here's a link to a post that includes your comment: "A worry for Obama: are too many of his supporters Hillary haters?"

Damn right I don't like the Clintons

Hillary at the top of the ticket and I vote republican. If she tapped Obama as VP and he accepted, I'd simply stay home.

The Clinton campaign's racist tactics against Obama in Nevada and South Carolina have forever turned me off to voting for them.

Obama at the top of the ticket and I vote for him. But I'd have some serious squick feelings going on if Hillary were anywhere near the white house even while doing it. Because where Hillary is, you have co-office holder bill not too far behind.

Quite frankly, in a perfect world Hillary Clinton would be nowhere near the white house ever again. The last thing this country needs is those divisive figures near the public levers of power again.