« Is Hillary Willing Her Way Onto The Ticket? | Main | The Limbaugh Effect Helps HRC? »

Obama Campaign Strikes

05 Mar 2008 12:30 pm

A campaign memo on HRC and her tax returns... asking "What does Clinton have to hide?" Read it after the jump.

TO: Interested Parties

FR: The Obama Campaign

RE: TAX RETURNS: What does Clinton have to hide?

DA: March 5, 2008

The Clinton campaign today maintained that “the vetting of Barack Obama has just begun.” The truth is, more than a year into this campaign, some very simple vetting of Hillary Clinton has yet to start.

In the face of her unwillingness to release her tax returns, Hillary Clinton has made the false case in this campaign that she is more electable because she has been fully vetted. When it comes to her personal finances, Senator Clinton’s refusal to release her taxes returns denies the media and the American people the opportunity to even begin that process. Though her campaign has tried to kick the issue down the road, Democratic voters deserve to know, right now, why it is she is hiding the information in her tax returns from last year.

The Clinton campaign has said that they have released copious amounts of financial information but there are many questions about their private dealings that could be answered in their tax returns but not in the information that is currently available. For example, here are eight pieces of information that could be learned from her tax returns, the accompanying schedules, and attachments:

* Effective tax rate – including whether or not any tax shelters were used to reduce it
* Amount of income for spouses by source
* Amount of stock gains and losses
* Gross income for the couple
* Amount earned from stock dividends
* Amount of household employment taxes paid
* Personal exemptions taken
* Charitable contributions made

Senator Clinton has also claimed that she is too “busy” to release her tax returns. Given the fact she is able to loan her campaign $5 million, you would think the Clintons would be able to hire an accountant. The reality is that she wants to keep this information hidden from voters. The people of Wyoming, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and the rest of the country should wonder why.

The Clintons’ record on releasing tax returns:

FEBRUARY 2008: Clinton Reiterated That She Would Not Release Her Tax Records Until She Is The Nominee And Not Before Mid-April. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton says she won't release her tax returns until she has the Democratic presidential nomination in hand, and not before tax filing time comes in mid-April. "I will release my tax returns," Clinton said during the debate. "I have consistently said I will do that once I become the nominee, or even earlier." Pressed about the timing of releasing her tax returns, campaign aides were more reticent Wednesday, indicating that Clinton would not release the sensitive financial data during a hotly contested primary, but only at tax filing time. [AP, 2/27/08]

JUNE 2007: Clinton Does Not Plan to Release Her Tax Returns Until Next Year. According to the Washington Post, Clinton said through a spokesman that, “like past presidential candidates,” she will “release tax information in the election year.” [Washington Post, 6/19/07]

APRIL 12, 1996: Clinton Released His Tax Returns. President Clinton and his wife earned $316,074 in 1995, including the president's $200,000 salary, according to tax returns released Friday by the White House. The public release of the tax returns, three days before the April 15 filing deadline, shows that Clinton and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton are owed a refund of $5,656 on the $81,093 they paid in taxes, and will apply that refund to their 1996 income taxes. [UPI, 4/12/96]

April 15, 1992: Bill Clinton Made His Tax Returns Public. APRIL 15, 1992: Bill Clinton made his tax returns made public. [Los Angeles Times, 4/16/93]

Bill Clinton Released His Tax Returns In 1992 But Refused To Release Their Tax Returns From Before 1980. During the 1992 campaign, the Clintons claimed to be coming clean by releasing their tax returns from 1980 forward. But they steadfastly refused to release their returns for prior years, and only later did we learn that 1978 and 1979 were the tax years when Mrs. Clinton reported her 10,000% cattle-futures trading profit. [WSJ, 2/22/08]

Comments (44)

Marc, why don't you answer Andrew's question? Why do you editorialize everything except for the Tax return issue? Why are you so wimpy w/that?

Good for you, Barack. If Hillary's going to go nuclear on a fellow Democrat, you'd damn sure better have a finger on the button yourself.

I think it's safe to say Obama's been more or less "vetted" and came through relatively unscathed although obviously damaged in terms of votes. But with Hillary's wins, she is the story now, and the press is going to tear her down just like it did Obama. Her "vetting" has only just begun.

Marc, why don't you answer Andrew's question? Why do you editorialize everything except for the Tax return issue? Why are you so wimpy w/that?

He's pretty wimpy on a lot of stuff, but he (usually) excels at reposting press releases inside fancy gray boxes. Apparently not today, though :(

"For example, here are eight pieces of information that could be learned from her tax returns, the accompanying schedules, and attachments"

Will ambinder ask the obama campaign when they will release "the accompanying schedules, and attachments"? Because neither obama has. The top sheet of a tax return provides less information than senators release every year. obama is treating reports like rubes. Will the reporters take it?

So a question for ambinder: Will you ask the obamas to release their "the accompanying schedules, and attachments" or will you be a rube?

No real "Vetting of Obamas" Yet?
How did Barak & Michell making $ 150k per year Buy a $ 1 million 200k mansion?

Just a 6.5% interest only mortgage would cost $ 65k and property taxes $ 25k... before income tax and FICA. On a cash basis, they need $ 128k just for House Expenses!

I was going to send an e-mail to David Plouffe and David Axelrod to return my campaign donations if they are not willing to release scandals against the Clintons. I can not continue to support a campaign and watch it lied against time and time again yet they will not respond even with facts that will indict the other campaign.

In a situation like that you can not be sure that if America is under attack such a campaign will form a government willing to respond with proportionate response.

But with this strategy of Attacking the Clintons on their own records, I will make a new donation on the Obama campaign. Nobody has monopoly of attacks.

At least while we attack with the truth, they attack with pure lies always debunked by the media just as the "NAFTA-GATE" has been debunked by the Canadian Government.

"How did Barak & Michell making $ 150k per year Buy a $ 1 million 200k mansion?

Posted by Robert"

Mostly because mrs. obama's income skyrocketed after mr. obama won his US senate seat. mrs. obama was appointed to several boards of directors including a major wal-mart supplier, treehouse foods, and the University of Chicago Hospitals board of directors. She also received a huge promotion jumping several others when the law firm she worked for promoted her. All shortly after obama 'beat' alan keyes for the senate seat. That upped their income by 10 times in a few months.

Then of course they still could not have bought the house without rezko's help.

Well Robert.... If you would've actually paid attention to what is going on you would have noticed that Barack Obama and his wife made 900K last year. You know that they do get paid for appearances that they make don't you? You sound like many of the Americans who fail to realize how great this guy is for our country. Do your self a favor and do some research before you start to bash Obama.

Robert, that's what happens have 2 best selling books.

This is going to be fun to finally hold HRC accountable - like candy from a baby. You made us do it Hillary!

She and her husband are hiding that they made a lot more money in book sales than Obama and didn't want it rub in because this campaign should be about issues that the American people care about.

Yes, there will indeed be some more vetting of Hillary. She will be under oath in August, and the voters are finally going to learn of the campaign finance fraud and obstruction of justice that she directed. Documents: http://hillcap.org

HILLARY! UNCENSORED - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019&pr=goog-sl

Robert, being in the academic world myself, I also know that academic institutions often offer special mortgage deals for professors, and I believe Obama was a professor of constitutional law, so he very likely also has a sweet mortgage percentage deal. Nothing any other professor wouldn't have. So that also addresses your affordability question.

I am going to donate to Obama's campaign with the specification that he needs to go negative at this point (unfortunately Hillary has dragged them to this.). It will be fairly easy to dispatch Hillary once we finally begin vetting HER.

Yeah...... thats it Angelica. she made more money by selling books thats why she's hiding her annual income. Now it all makes since now ( sarcasm). How about the fact that she is a fraud and don't want people to find out. I know it wouldn't take me months to get my Tax return if I had too. And if i did people who say I have something to hide, But Hilary... She's not hiding anything she just being modest. :)

P.S. that was more Sarcasm

$150k seems awfully low.

Speaking about research, Obama is a best selling author of two books that have both won Grammy Awards. Authors typicially get advances for their books, so that's where he got money for his house.

I recommend reading both of them whether you are for or against him.

Update. Just learned Barak and Michell PAID $ 1,6500,000.00 IN a CASH "Lump Sum" for Chicago Mansion in June 2005! With No Mortgage?

See Article by The London Times. (A VERY REPUTABLE INTERNATIONAL NEWSPAPER)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3433485.ece

Did this Iraqi billionaire pay for Senator Obama's Chicago mansion?
The London Times investigative reporters have found strong ties between Senator Obama and Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi billionaire (and convicted felon) who now lives in the UK. Auchi loaned money to fellow Arab Rezko (key supporter of Senator Obama). Senator Obama when a Illinois State Senator lobbied successfully for Auchi to be allowed a US Visa. The Senator says he does not remember meeting Auchi at the lavish Gala Party at the Four Seasons Hotel in Chicago, which was thrown in Auchi's honor by his political patron the now disgraced Illinois governor!

Senator Obama and his wife have never explained how on their salaries they could have amassed a $1.65Million lump sum to pay for their Chicago mansion without a mortgage in June 2005.

Why won't Senator Obama come clean on his finances? Maybe the Rezko trial that started on March 3 will jog his memory.

"Speaking about research, Obama is a best selling author of two books that have both won Grammy Awards. Authors typicially get advances for their books, so that's where he got money for his house.

I recommend reading both of them whether you are for or against him.

Posted by Arthur"

No thanks I only have so much time to waste. Anyway the only way obama could afford the house was if someone bought the lot next door at the same time. A requirement of the seller. Both properties had to close at the same time. That's why obama called up his long time patron rezko.

Robert... Obama has released his tax return so everyone can see. Instead of googling Rezko how about you google Obama tax return and you can see all of his infomation, while your at it google Hillary tax statements as well so you can see her information too. WAIT.... you can't check and see her information that's because she won't release it. WAKE UP BUDDY!!!! YOU JUST BEEN DOOPED by Hillary.

Robert, Obama himself is the one that makes 157k plus his wife was making 273k. Leave alone the books that Obama published. Example in 2006, the netted in 900K combined and you telling us he can't afford 1.2mil house?

Hadenough.......

You sound like a clever realtor......
How about you hook up with and accountant and get to the bottom of this "Tax release scandal" seing that you already solve the mystery of Obama's income.

For anyone who references Rezko needs to this is sun times article from a month and a half ago, it basically lays out the entire relationship between Rezko and Obama.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article

Basically the big issues about Obama and Rezko are that 1) Obama bought a piece of land from his wife at one time (Nothing awful) and 2) Rezko donated money to Obama, but as with the Farrakhan issue, one cannot help it if someone thinks they are a good person.

"Well Robert.... If you would've actually paid attention to what is going on you would have noticed that Barack Obama and his wife made 900K last year.

Posted by jay"

obama hasn't released his 2007 tax returns. Isn't that funny... Yeah sure it is. Anyway the 900,000 was in 2006 after mrs. obama resigned several postitions she landed right after mr obama 'beat' alan keyes for the US senate seat.

break down of obama's 2006 return:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/summaryobama.pdf

Senator's family rakes in nearly $1.7 mil. in 2005

For the Barack Obama household, 2005 was a very good year.

Not only was Obama sworn in as a freshman U.S. senator, but he reaped big bucks from book deals and his wife got her own promotion and hefty pay raise.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/72374,CST-NWS-obama26.article

Now I'm sure it was just coinky dink that Michelle's giant jump in income and several appiontments to various major corps boards happened right after obama 'beat' alan keyes for a US senate seat. After all what else could it have been?

It's like Hillary just gets off on withholding her returns.

"Basically the big issues about Obama and Rezko are that 1) Obama bought a piece of land from his wife at one time (Nothing awful) and 2) Rezko donated money to Obama, but as with the Farrakhan issue, one cannot help it if someone thinks they are a good person.


Posted by Rick"

Smell the coffee rick. obama has been lying about his rezko relationship from the start. The fawning "liberal media" won't touch it so no wonder most have no idea. I won't bother posting the FBI mole recording numerous conversations between rezko and obama after obama has said he hardly knew rezko. Look up thread. The land deal is a tiny part of rezko-gate.

I just looked at your link hadenough.... " What's your point everything looks good from what I see and I AM AN ACCOUNTANT. I have a idea " Lets compare Obama tax returns with Hilllary" Oh wait we can't now can we? Like Jay said " seeing that you solve the mystery of Obama house situation how about you try to crack the case of the infamous hiding of tax statements from Hillary. Gessh You Clinton supporters are really pathetic. I'm a independent voter and I don't think i can ever Vote for Hillary her voters are too nieve and gullible

I just looked at your link hadenough.... " What's your point everything looks good from what I see and I AM AN ACCOUNTANT. I have a idea " Lets compare Obama tax returns with Hilllary" Oh wait we can't now can we? Like Jay said " seeing that you solve the mystery of Obama house situation how about you try to crack the case of the infamous hiding of tax statements from Hillary". Gessh You Clinton supporters are really pathetic. I'm a independent voter and I don't think i can ever Vote for Hillary her voters are too nieve and gullible

I just looked at your link hadenough.... " What's your point everything looks good from what I see and I AM AN ACCOUNTANT. I have a idea " Lets compare Obama tax returns with Hilllary" Oh wait we can't now can we? Like Jay said " seeing that you solve the mystery of Obama house situation how about you try to crack the case of the infamous hiding of tax statements from Hillary". Gessh You Clinton supporters are really pathetic. I'm a independent voter and I don't think i can ever Vote for Hillary, her voters are too nieve and gullible

"I just looked at your link hadenough.... " What's your point everything looks good from what I see and I AM AN ACCOUNTANT.

Posted by Chris "

You are an ACCOUNTANT huh? I hope you aren't mine. The point was the $900,000 figure was their 2006 tax return not 2007 as the poster said. Being an ACCOUNTANT you might want to try paying closer attention. It could matter to you cleints.

hadenough, go up a bit and check their 2005-2006 incomes so you don't make yourself look like an idiot.

"hadenough, go up a bit and check their 2005-2006 incomes so you don't make yourself look like an idiot.

Posted by mosdef"

Hey mosdef thanks for the tip. I did just what you suggested. I looked at the link saying their 2006 income was $900,000 just like I typed in. Here is jay mistating obama's 2007 income:

"Well Robert.... If you would've actually paid attention to what is going on you would have noticed that Barack Obama and his wife made 900K last year.

Posted by jay"

Here is a tip for ya: Pay attention.

Here is the funny thing: obama has not released his 2007 tax returns. obama has never released the bottom sheets of his tax returns. The bottom sheets are the same ones axelrod is whining about now. Isn't that funny... yeah it is.

for the love of god, it's BARACK... not BARAK.

if you're so against the guy, at least learn how to spell his name.

Ok Hadenough

"Book royalties and advances brought in about $1.2 million for the senator-author. In late 2004, Obama landed a three-book deal worth $1.9 million"

Let me see, what would 'advances' mean? Oh right, you get the money in advance!

How about "Mr book publisher, can I have an advance on my book deal as I am buying a house?" "Sure, here's ya go, don't spend it all on the curtains."

FIN

Barack--Stop it.
The reason people are so excited about you is because you stay above the fray. Ignore Clinton, keep focused on getting young people engaged. I was at an event of 25 people in Raleigh NC last night, aged 75-18, and only two had been engaged in politics before. The rest were new, tentative, and open. They showed up despite a tornado watch. Keep your eyes on them. DO NOT STOOP. That is the old way and you are the new. If you play by Clinton rules you will lose. Play by Obama rules. (McCain is. Ignore Hillary. Engage respectfully with McCain the way you did with Hillary at first.) Then get some in depth stories out there about the racial reconcilation that happens at these grass roots Barack events!!!! They are what you are working for--the campfires of the little people.

Hilary needs to calm herself down with attacks! Obama can easily bring out her mishandling with the White Water scandal that we all paid for as tax payers. Ooops! I forgot Obama doesn't steep so low...

Hilary needs to calm herself down with attacks! Obama can easily bring out her mishandling with the White Water scandal that we all paid for as tax payers. Ooops! I forgot Obama doesn't steep so low...

I think the Obama campaign needs to be more explicit than this.

They must have some op research to give them a hint of what she's hiding, they should suggest what's being hidden:

Is Hillary Clinton concealing a large income? How is Hillary Clinton making this money? Is former President Clinton making speeches at $300,000 per speech? Who's paying him? Which dates? Are there shady deals going on in the patterns of Whitewater and Chinese campaign contributors?

Don't be nuanced. People don't get nuanced. Make clear suggestions as to what the Clintons are hiding.

I think the Obama campaign needs to be more explicit than this.

They must have some op research to give them a hint of what she's hiding, they should suggest what's being hidden:

Is Hillary Clinton concealing a large income? How is Hillary Clinton making this money? Is former President Clinton making speeches at $300,000 per speech? Who's paying him? Which dates? Are there shady deals going on in the patterns of Whitewater and Chinese campaign contributors?

Don't be nuanced. People don't get nuanced. Make clear suggestions as to what the Clintons are hiding.

Is former President Clinton making speeches at $300,000 per speech?

We all know that Bill has made bank on speaking engagements. I would wager that, at the very least, Clinton doesn't want the exact figures out there when she's arguing that "speeches don't put bread on the table." The irony might be a bit too thick at that point.

I don't disagree that the Obama campaign needs to be more specific. The issues are relatively straightforward. The Clintons' net worth is now north of $40 million. It was under $1 million when they left office. Fair enough, they have cashed in on their fame.

The issues are around how they have amassed that larget a fortune in such a short time. Bill Clinton has been lobbying on behalf of business interests and has been paid via $300,000 speeches. Companies don't pay $300,000 for a speech. That's called window dressing. The reality is he is being compensated for providing sweetheart access to world leaders to close business deals. Again, fair enough if that is how he wants to leverage his post Presidency. GHW Bush has done similar deals with the Saudis in the 90's and became famously wealthy doing it.

So what's the big deal? The guy is going to go back to the White House, and there are huge conflicts of interest here. He is effectively one of the top super lobbyists in the country, and he'll have influence on policy decisions. That is a major conflict. We have had an administration who for 8 years has been in bed with oil interests. The Clintons know if they release their income, there will be a series of never ending questions about how they were able to parlay their service into such extraordinary wealth. It will be never ending for them.

This was pointed out to me as a subliminal message. I didn't believe but checked it out anyway. On the 3 a.m. ad by Hillary, I realized that on the child's PJs were the letters in huge caps, NIG. i doubt this was an accident.


Gives a new meaning to dirty politics.

"This was pointed out to me as a subliminal message. I didn't believe but checked it out anyway. On the 3 a.m. ad by Hillary, I realized that on the child's PJs were the letters in huge caps, NIG. i doubt this was an accident.

Gives a new meaning to dirty politics.

Posted by Wendy"

You people are too funny.

Is anyone paying attention to the News release today in Canada? Follow up on the latest CBC news.
Well, they are now saying the Clinton camp was behind this NAFTAgate thing.How much more deliberate can this be; that's why the PM is so upset. Yes Obama should attack that*****

Let the American PEOPLE see your TAX RETURNS Clinton ! What are you afraid of ?