« Marty Feldstein Warns Of "Severe Recession" | Main | Petreaus On The Surge »

Obama Spends Friday Tieing Up Loose Ends

14 Mar 2008 07:00 pm

First, he strongly denounces his spiritual mentor's racist, anti-American sermons in an essay on the Huffington Post website (nice -- how many Obama donors DON'T read that site? -- and, as a Jewish person, I can write this -- how many Jewish Obama donors don't check that site)

As I have written about in my books, I first joined Trinity United Church of Christ nearly twenty years ago. I knew Rev. Wright as someone who served this nation with honor as a United States Marine, as a respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago. He also led a diverse congregation that was and still is a pillar of the South Side and the entire city of Chicago. It's a congregation that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.

Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church.

And Sen. Obama spent several hours sitting down with the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times answering their questions about Tony Rezko.

From the Tribune:

Indicted Chicago businessman Antoin "Tony" Rezko was a more significant fundraiser for presidential candidate Barack Obama's earlier political campaigns than previously known. Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for the first three offices Obama sought, the senator told the Tribune on Friday.

Obama also said for the first time that his private real estate transactions with Rezko involved repeated lapses of judgment. The mistake, Obama said, was not simply that Rezko was under grand jury investigation at the time of their 2005 and 2006 dealings. "The mistake was he had been a contributor and somebody involved in politics," he said.

Comments (16)

Color me impressed. I am biased so I knew I wouldn't mind any of the content of this but WOW at the media plan.

This was inevitable. Obama runs up a big lead in the primaries, and the next thing you know the Clinton campaign drags us all down into the gutter with manufactured 'scandals.'

But I'm confident that the voters aren't going to be swayed by this crap. They have seen this act before, and one of the reasons so many of them support Obama is because he is seeking to elevate the conversation.

Marc, search your memory and see if you can recall anything of substance coming out of the Clinton camp in the past month. It's been non-stop peripheral bullshit, in a desperate attempt to throw mud at Obama in the hopes that some of it will stick.

Hillary can't win the nomination this way, and if by some chance she does succeed, she will have alienated a huge slice of the Democratic electorate and we will all pay the price in November.

What do we know now? He is not muslim. We find out he has a pastor. So I guess that makes him a christian!

Hillary's Would-Be "Rezko" -- Terry McAuliffe, Chappaqua, 1999

Twice, in the same 6-sentence email, Howard Wolfson last Wednesday referred to Tony Rezko as a "political fixer."

But Terry McAuliffe is nothing, if not a political fixer. And in 1999, Hillary Clinton -- whose campaign likes to remind us, these days, about Obama's residential real estate deal with Rezko in June 2005 -- was quite happy for Terry McAuliffe to "fix" her own residential real estate deal.

Recall that, when the Clintons went house-shopping that summer, they were carrying $5.5M in legal bills, and their only visible means of support was Bill's presidential salary.

Not a terribly reassuring financial profile with which to persuade any bank to give them a $1.7M mortgage -- the price of the Chappaqua Colonial they had their eyes on.

So the Clintons signed a contract which provided for McAuliffe to quietly float them collateral to the tune of $1.35M in cash.

According to this NYT article, here's what appealed to both the Clintons and McAuliffe, about the "cash" part of the deal:

By putting up cash rather than making a guarantee or by co-signing, Mr. McAuliffe avoids either party's having to bare their financial souls. ''There's the ability to remain discreet,'' said Melissa Cohn, president of the Manhattan Mortgage Company. ''It saves them from any disclosure.''

Republicans and good-government groups howled. But it appears that it was challenges to the deal from one Republican, in particular -- Rudy Giuliani, who, like Hillary Clinton, was preparing to run for the U.S Senate in 2000 -- that "persuaded" the Clintons to scrap it.

But here is the absolute height of irony and hypocrisy: The same Howard Wolfson that is haranguing Obama now about the Rezko deal was Hillary Clinton's press secretary then.

And not only did Wolfson defend Clinton then, for signing her name to something -- buying a house with a $1.35M cash safety net from McAuliffe -- that, unlike Obama's transaction with Rezko, immediately was regarded as ethically suspect.

Pointing to Giuliani's previous campaign finance transgressions, Wolfson said that Giuliani "should clean up his own house before throwing mud at someone else's."

In fact, it is the Clinton campaign that -- in trying to use Rezko to score points on Obama -- is sitting inside a house made of very thin glass.

These sermons are several years old. Where was this apology when he launched his campaign and Q's about the pastor were raised then? Waiting a year looks very strange.

http://www.political-buzz.com/

I'm afraid I cannot believe Senator Obama's insistence that over the course of a 20-year relationship he and his wife never heard any of these sermons and that he had no idea Rev. Wright harbored these views until he began running for president. Ghost of zorro, I have to disagree strongly with your point of view. This is not a scandal manufactured by the Clinton campaign. This is an example of Senator Obama's much-vaunted judgment going hideously awry. Astonishing.

Other bloggers seem to think Wright went to Colonel Gadaffi's place with Farrakhan in 1984. Any comment on that?

I find Obama's statement completely satisfactory, and suspect that those who are not satisfied were already disinclined to find merit in the senator well before the video of Wright appeared. It occurs to me that if we start proclaiming people guilty by association, there will be no end of it.

Also, it's nonsense that this is comparable to Ferraro. Wright was speaking as a pastor, and did intend his remarks for a larger audience. Ferraro was speaking to a journalist.

And lastly, I don't detect anything hateful or racist in Wright's remarks. Misguided, yes, but in a way that would have never come to light had someone (an editor at Fox? Or, God forbid, a member of the Clinton campaign?) not decided to use the video as a fear bomb.

Where was the fuss when McCain called Washington D.C the 'city of Satan' which he did a week ago. Not a word of it has been discussed. He gets a free pass from the media and Obama is smared with association by a ranting pastor.

These aren't just "loose ends" Obama can "tie up" by stopping for a moment to put his foot up on a park bench.

Wright and Rezko are fundamental parts of his political and personal development from the time he first moved to Chicago and started life as a working adult.

The sphere of influence on his character and philosophy extends through these two to a lot of even less palatable "mentors" as well. People like Louis Farrakhan, Nadhmi Auchi, and a lot of other convicted, or borderline criminal, types.

That doesn't even take into account his current "mentor", David Axelrod (walking proof that Dr. Mengele's cloning experiments bore fruit afterall). Der Udder Fuhrer's main claim to fame up to now has been as the father of some drunken, loudmouthed, NBA fan who was harassing Gina Davis to the point that her husband Antonio was forced to leave the court in the middle of the game to confront him. Then young Axelrod had the gall to sue the Davis family for ONE MILLION DOLLARS.

Apparently rotten apples don't fall far from twisted trees. Pops is making a living off harassing the wife of a famous citizen, then compaining loudly when that famous citizen "steps onto the court" to confront him.

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign.

Plausible? Does Obama saying this really "tie up loose ends" or challenge the press to dredge up old Wright rants? (Hmm, this is Obama we are talking about; a somnolent press is not out of the question).

Other bloggers seem to think Wright went to Colonel Gadaffi's place with Farrakhan in 1984. Any comment on that?

The NY Times had that a year ago. And as to whether Obama knew Wright was trouble, he did disinvite him to his Presidential announcement:

According to the pastor, Mr. Obama then told him, “You can get kind of rough in the sermons, so what we’ve decided is that it’s best for you not to be out there in public.”

But maybe Barack had only discovered that in the preceding week, after nineteen years in that church in a state of ignorance and bliss.

Where was the fuss when McCain called Washington D.C the 'city of Satan' which he did a week ago.

McCain is three hundred years old and has been in the public eye since after the glaciers receded - we are hardly trying to discover the "real" McCain.

Barack, OTOH, is a youngster from nowhere known by no one, so incidental evidence counts as people try to figure out who he is.

Obamamanians...the Clintons have put you
back on the ol' plantation. Tote dat barge,
lif' dat bale..for this white liberal race
baitin' couple. You're mad, as you see it slipping away.......how many of you victims
will turn around and back Hillary and Massa
Bill come November? ......too many, as history
tells us. Surprise "white " America in the
election.

If people really want to figure out who he is, then read his book "Dreams from my Father". He wrote it before he ever even ran for state government, and it is incredibly candid and honest. It illustrates more than anything how insightful he really can be, and how incredibly complex he is. He wasn't always such a calm person about racial issues. In his youth he was a bitter, resentful youth who had the classic views of the white establishment one gains in the '70s, and he was highly pessimistic. He did a LOT of growing up, and his years in Chicago really showed him how much of an idiot he had been, how immature.

He realized he had been trying to force a black identity upon himself, and he learned to just be who he was. That being said, that old self won't just disappear, and he has a certain philosophical respect for black nationalism, in its ability (particularly in the Nation of Islam) to lift black men into a constructive life. That being said, Wright hardly comes off as a black nationalist. So what? He stated that Hilary couldn't understand the black perspective, and that America is an easier place for whites than blacks. Haven't all liberals been saying that for DECADES? He said that 9/11 was a consequence of stupid and heartless foreign policy, and doesn't Hilary believe that ALSO? He said that he was glad that Jesus lived a life that would allow him to understand the struggle that poor black people go through in America. So WHAT?

I wish people would stop nitpicking! The only people who are "shocked" by this are the people that supported Hilary anyway.

The Democratic party loves to claim it is the
Big Tent Party. It is giving us a great circus
extravaganza:

Teetering high wire acts by Hillary and Obama.

Trained seals barking liberal dogma.

1000 party clowns exiting their plywood taxi to
tittilate the faithful.

Whip-snapping tamers subduing their roaring racists.

Mark Penn juggling the truth.

Ringmaster Howard...AWOL...

The MSM salivating over the success of the
performance...

The stoic elephants waiting in the wings for
their curtain-call....THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH!

Obama's post at Huff and his appearances on all the major cables were very well done. Reasoned, salient and completely calm.

This guy is good.

He's no longer got to worry about the Muslim mess that's been following him all along. Wright would have surfaced seriously at some point, now is better than later. He's got a month to explain to PA and NC the details.

Snookered again Clintons...but the delight is that this time Hannity has saliva all over his face and no one is going to listen to him about it any more! ;)

It also gives the semi-sane part of the nation a good long while to engage in a serious and hopefully sane conversation about the place of religion in politics and race in general.

If he does nothing else in this election cycle, he will have advanced our conversation more than anyone else in a good long while.

Good for him.

Now all you PA denizens...are there more of you that are willing to move beyond this sort of navel gazing or are you going to let the old, bitter faction control your politics yet again? Get out there and engage!

I propose the media hold all LATE FRIDAY AFTERNOON news until Monday, so politicians can't bury embarassing news like this. At least Obama learned something from the Clintons!