« McCain Moves On Torture? | Main | McCain's Log Cabin Surrogate: Schwarzenegger »

A Modest Proposal For Those Who Haven't Read Obama's Books

11 Apr 2008 12:28 am

Before you profess to be shocked by out-of-context snippets, read the whole book.

Here, for those who haven't, are some of the representatives paragraphs from "Dreams of My Father."

At least on the basketball court I could find a community of sorts, with an inner life all its own. It was there that I would make my closest white friends, on turf where blackness couldn’t be a disadvantage. And it was there that I would meet Ray and the other blacks close to my age who had begun to trickle into the islands, teenagers whose confusion and anger would help shape my own.

“That’s just how white folks will do you,” one of them might say when we were alone. Everybody would chuckle, and my mind would run down a ledger of slights: the first boy, in seventh grade, who called me a coon; his tears of surprise (“Why’dya do that?”) when I gave him a bloody nose. The tennis pro who told me that I shouldn’t touch the schedule of matches pinned to the bulletin board because my colour might rub off; his thin-lipped, red-faced smile – “Can’t you take a joke?” – when I threatened to report him.

That’s just how white folks will do you. It wasn’t merely the cruelty involved; I was learning that black people could be mean and then some. It was a particular brand of arrogance, an obtuseness in otherwise sane people that brought forth our bitter laughter. It was as if whites didn’t know that they were being cruel in the first place. Or at least thought you deserving of their scorn. White folks. The term itself was uncomfortable in my mouth at first; I felt like a nonnative speaker tripping over a difficult phrase. Sometimes I would find myself talking to Ray about white folks this or white folks that, and I would suddenly remember my mother’s smile and the words that I spoke would seem awkward and false. Or I would be helping Gramps dry the dishes after dinner and Toot [his grandmother] would come in to say that she was going to sleep, and those same words – white folks – would flash in my head like a bright neon sign, and I would suddenly grow quiet, as if I had secrets to keep.

Later, when I was alone, I would try to untangle these difficult thoughts. It was obvious that certain whites could be exempted from the general category of our distrust: Ray was always telling me how cool my grandparents were. The term white was simply a shorthand for him, I decided, a tag for what my mother would call a bigot. And although I recognised the risks in his terminology – Ray assured me that we would never talk about whites as whites in front of whites without knowing exactly what we were doing. Without knowing that there might be a price to pay. But was that right? Was there still a price to pay? That was the complicated part, the thing that Ray and I never could seem to agree on.

Comments (16)

There are, within the conservative movement, some to whom race is a very 'difficult' issue. They really, really, don't like people who aren't white.

Don't be surprised that they deliberately take things out of context to fuel their 'fear'.

Reading the comments on the post you linked to, I'm not left in any doubt who the racists and bigots are.

Thanks Marc, as I have not read the book and reading the excerpt I can see more clearly how it is that Barack being both Black & White, and being in both worlds, can begin to take on this very difficult task and possibly begin to heal the racial divisions in this country more than anyone else at this time and maybe it is his mission to bridge and unite not just race, but maybe the country as a whole too, knowing the hurt, pain and misunderstandings divisions can bring.


After you read the book, can you throw the book at him?

It's an incredibly honest book, and everyone who is quick to shoot down Obama (or support him) should read it first.

Forget about whether or not you want him to be president, his voice will be an important one in this country for many years to come.

He'll bring the races and the country together, part the Red Sea and turn water into wine.

Because he wrote a book. He's so smart!

Actual real-life record of such healing -- in his church, in his family, in the Senate? Rather thin on its face.

But hey, one must have the audacity to hope that he'll be able to achieve such miracles.

And if he fails, you can just blame those racist Republicans.

Foolproof!

I've read The Audacity of Hope; I'm assuming this is from Dreams of My Father?

Anyway, I'm starting to come to the realization that while you may be able to reason with the people who spread this sort of disingeniousness in private, when they gather in masses it's impossible. You have to beat them to the "undecideds", the people who don't see it as politically expedient to pretend to believe things like "Obama's a black nationalist".

Of course, McCain supporters will say "Hey, it's in kind - you took 100 years out of context, right?" While that drags you into a debate of logical gymnastics (which I'm sure this thread will develop into), I doubt that's why they actually did it in the first place - they were going to do this whether or not anyone blasted McCain for making it perfectly evident that he has no plans for leaving Iraq any time soon.

The irony here is that Obama was surely presenting the experience of a black youth and how it is that black people can unfairly develop resentment of white people, and how this feeds into a cycle of racial hatred.

JB-

Wouldn't you say his rhetoric, his posture on racial issues, the amount of white votes he's received and the very viability of his campaign at a national level is proof positive of his ability to bring people together and heal or leap frog many racial divides?

On its face, that seems rather substantive to me. But hey, why don't we get back to playing guilt by association. That really is more entertaining than doing the due diligence of actually reading his books.

If you read his book, though, you have to accept how much of it is a lie.

Not So Simple, Says Tribune

The real Ray, Keith Kakugawa, is half black and half Japanese. In an interview with the Tribune on Saturday, Kakugawa said he always considered himself mixed race, like so many of his friends in Hawaii, and was not an angry young black man.

He said he does recall long, soulful talks with the young Obama and that his friend confided his longing and loneliness. But those talks, Kakugawa said, were not about race. "Not even close," he said, adding that Obama was dealing with "some inner turmoil" in those days.

"But it wasn't a race thing," he said. "Barry's biggest struggles then were missing his parents. His biggest struggles were his feelings of abandonment. The idea that his biggest struggle was race is [bull]."

Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.

"Wouldn't you say his rhetoric, his posture on racial issues, the amount of white votes he's received and the very viability of his campaign at a national level is proof positive of his ability to bring people together and heal or leap frog many racial divides?"

I would say it's proof-positive of his ability as a shrewd campaigner. But so were the Clintons in the 90s.

Again, the very defense you offer proves my point.

I stand by my observation that your theories regarding Obama's magical healing powers are largely unproven, and even more, untestable in the harsh light of political reality.

No real-life record of such healing prior to the phonybaloneyness of a campaign. And the ever-ready "in case of failure, blame racist conservatives."

It's all perfectly circular and post-modern. Yawn.

JB -

I see your "in case of failure, blame racist conservatives" and raise you "completely misrepresent what he said and mock liberals' optimist as 'magical healing powers'"

In response to Cal, Kakuga's testimony regarding his exchanges with Obama does not invalidate the latter's experience. And when he says: The idea that his biggest struggle was race is [bull], how would he know what was going on within Obama's inner self? Something that, at that time, Obama most probably would have been in the process of figuring out himself.

JB-

What exactly would this "proof" that you seek look like if it isn't his ability to forge the largest multi-ethnic coalition for a minority candidate for national office in the history of this country?

Just curious.

But the real-life acquaintance on whom Obama based his "Ray" character turned out to have been Bosnian, neh?

In further response to Cal, the article referenced did appear in some other magazine right around that time (no, I don't have a reference right now). He was 9, and wrote it 25 years later. So he forgot what magazine it was.

There was in fact an article (I think several magazines in the late 60s published similar articles IIRC) that showed what he's talking about.

Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.

But Cal, I'm nearly exactly Obama's age, and as soon as I read exactly that passage in the book, it resonated with me, because I also remember reading something about a black person hurting himself when trying to lighten his skin, also when I was a child, which I carried in my mind ever after as a graphic image of the horror wrought by racism. I remember it clearly because I was young enough at the time that (especially since I was white) it was one of the first things that brought that home to me. And I also vividly remember something bringing the thing back to me later when I was in college (at which point it was already a memory from so many years ago that I couldn't clearly say where I'd read it).

I don't remember reading it in Life magazine - I don't, in fact, remember where I read it, and I'm almost certain I never read Life as a child. But there's no way I believe you that something that so closely resembles an experience that I too had as a similarly-aged child of the same generation was a lie (as opposed to, maybe, an honest mistake decades later about which magazine he read it in).

Incidentally, I somehow put up the above quote incorrectly. Sorry about that. The entire bottom of that post is a quote from the article, not just the italicized part.

But Cal, I'm nearly exactly Obama's age, and as soon as I read exactly that passage in the book, it resonated with me,

Proving yet again that Obama's supporters aren't really seeing him, but their own fabulous reflection in the mirror.

The point of my post was that his autobiography is not undisputed reality.