« RNC Rules Committee Passes "Ohio Plan" | Main | McCain Orders Up A Pounder »

McCain's Search: Does He Have A List?

02 Apr 2008 05:00 pm

John McCain’s advisers did not prepare to spend to spent the majority of their time answering questions today about their candidate’s vice presidential search.

Advisers said that McCain’s remarks this morning to radio host Don Imus were not intended to signal a new phase in the process, and yet, given that McCain used the l-word – “list” for the first time, aides had no choice.

They came up with two talking points. “This process is at the very beginning,” senior adviser Steve Schmidt said.

The small circle of advisers with whom McCain plans to consult – Schmidt, Charlie Black, Mark Salter, Rick Davis, Sen. Lindsey Graham and a few others – will not discuss the search and will not provide guidance to the media about its progress.

Why? Here’s talking point two: the more public the search is, the more the privacy of potential
nominees are invaded, and more feelings are bruised among those who did not make the cut.

What appears to be happening internally is that McCain has begun to talk about the qualities he wants in a vice president with his advisers. There is no written, cross-out-the-losers-list, not now, anyway, even though McCain told Imus that he had about 20 names in mind.

Schmidt said that McCain might – or might not – appoint a czar to oversee the search.

“We have studied the process and understand what has worked right and what has not worked right,” Schmidt said. “No leaks,” he said, is one of the rules.

The press seems to have settled on its own shortlist. Some of the names are plausible, like Govs. Tim Pawlenty and John Huntsman Jr. Both have been fierce campaigners for McCain, and advisers to the two men have acknowledged that their surrogacy has amounted to an audition for the job.

Others represent the wishes of conservatives: Ohio Rep. Rob Portman, SEC chairman and former congressman Chris Cox; others are being pushed by their own informal PR teams, like Sec/State Condoleezza Rice, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee.

And for those who like to traffic in the Colin Powell speculation, remember two things: one – he disagrees with Sen. McCain about the way forward in Iraq. And two, he is 70 years old.

Comments (15)

Rob Portman is OMB director now.

I think these are the top 5 names on his list:
1. Mark Sanford
2. Rob Portman
3. Tim Pawlenty
4. John Thune
5. Mitt Romney

I suspect it will be Romney.

As a Obama supporter. Please... please choose Romney. I just wouldn't be able to stop laughing.....at him.


McCained need someone who can energize the Repubican Base, like Pat Robertson.

Actually, Mark and Richard Skinner are both wrong--Portman is a former director of the OMB and a former Member of Congress, but currently holds neither position.

Also, I don't like being a grammar troll, Marc, but you might want to clean up the vague and unclear first sentence...

I think McCain would rather go back to Vietnam than run on a ticket with Romney.

Also, regarding Portman, how exactly does McCain run against Bush's overspending if his running mate is Bush's former budget director?

Colin Powell is 70? Man I feel old. I have always just thought of him as being in his prime.

Makes sense though. The Gulf War was *17* years ago, so he'd have been 53 -- just the right age for that position.

Boy time flies...

McCained need someone who can energize the Repubican Base, like Pat Robertson.


Which is way the pick will be Mark Sanford. The fundies love him. And he is a Governor. McCain will not, if he is smart, pick another Congresscritter.

Mittmentum!

At any rate, is Condi really running a PR team that is pushing her for VP? My sense was that this was something being pushed by starstruck fanboys, and that she had no particular interest in the job.

Chris S - I think McCain would rather go back to Vietnam than run on a ticket with Romney.

Bob Portman might be a good choice, but he IS pretty unknown to the public...

Condi Rice would be a disaster as Bush's "Mr. Smithers", who not only has Bush baggage and a long list of things to explain about her own bad advice to Bush, but she personally carried Bush luggage at times. Her name is put out by a small faction of Republicans enthralled with the idea of emulating Democrat identity politics - the same sort of people that parachuted Alan Keyes into Illinois without medications and came up with Harriet Miers as a "brilliant diversity strategy". Unfortunately, Rice as a "two-fer" would not gain any real black vote share, nor any real family vote as the career spinster never elected to office or dealing with any domestic US problem.

The ideal choice would be the able and well-liked by voters and Christians - Governor of a major Swing State. Who has tons of domestic experience and whose kids are half Mexican. Alas, his last name is Bush..

On the other hand Romney, if McCain does hate him as Chris S says, would make perfect sense. FDR had little use for Truman. Eisenhower disliked Richard Nixon but picked him for his anti-communist poplarity, and ability to get votes out West, instead of Earl Warren...JFK and LBJ disliked AND distrusted one another. Reagan didn't like preppy boy HW Bush and made him publicly recant his abortion and "voodoo economics" charges as a condition for being Vice President. The Clintons and Noble Algore disliked one another from the start, especially Al and Hillary.
On the other hand, Carter, HW Bush, and Dubya loved and trusted their VPs Fritz, Danny Boy, and Uncle Dick and we saw how all the love and synergy there helped their Presidencies - NOT!

The selection of Romney helps the Party with Romney and some other vigorous, highly intelligent people in the wings who can work domestic issues and have wads of executive experience and ability to deal with foreign affairs with some tutelage..It would help McCain by patching up some domestic weaknesses on health care, energy, and fiscal management. And put most swing states in play.
One of the weakest areas most Republicans have is health care, health insurance. But curiously, the only two people that have created viable plans that did not crush the taxpayer - and are underway now, are Schwarzenegger and Romney. Taking Romneycare nation-wide and allowing states to adjust it to their situations and keep it from being socialized medicine that most people think we can't afford the Hillarycare or Obamacare* as pie in the sky - actually would help the Republicans turn a major losing issue to their plus. Romneycare will work, it is affordable, and was done on a bipartisan basis with Mass Dems and Teddy Kennedy.

* - Unless Obamacare involves Barack going around and laying hands on liberals to cure them of their ailments, or be the Black Redeemer who will save their guilty souls if they are beyond his healing powers. That care would be cheaper and even better than Romneycare if Obama can cure cancer and make the lame walk..

And it would perhaps be good for McCain's rep as a vengeful, sanctimonious angry man who is sometimes trapped in his personal dislikes and appears petty in the vendettas he has. Picking Romney would signal that McCain puts aside his hatreds for the good of the nation, that his anger and resentments don't control him or prevent him from reaching out..

The other small thing that could be large is that picking a religious minority would signal that Republicans believe in the true diversity of thought and beliefs rather than the false Dem idea of diversity meaning a collection of "victims" of persecution by race, gender, sexual orientation who are still required to think and belief the same things, no heretics allowed....

I love the bolded sentence. Republicans, a vast number of whom were terribly upset about Romney not being a real Christian, who have run campaigns based on intolerance, nativisim, and homophobia, who have, as their current President, a man of great intolerance for anybody who does not agree with him, are the party of true diversity in though and beliefs. Next thing you'll tell me they are the party of competence in economic management and national security. Thanks for that thought. I haven't laughed so much in weeks.

What would the prospects be for Tom Coburn, the Senator from Oklahoma? Deficit hawk, big on government transparency, and strong social-issues right winger--doesn't he fit the bill of "conservative reformer"?

Chris Cox hands down.

chris ford,

Mitt Romney actually had little to do with "Romneycare" other than taking credit for it as governor and then running away from it as presidential candidate. The veto-proof Democratic majority in the Massachusetts legislature was more than prepared to override him. You also seem oddly unfamiliar with any of the actual details of the Massachusetts plan.

Given that the Massachusetts plan contains an individual health insurance mandate, like "Hillarycare 2," Hillary's current plan, I would think most conservatives would see it as actually more onerous than Obama's plan.

But given his past performance, I'm sure Mitt will be happy to be either for or against his own plan specifically and socialized medicine generally depending on what's in his own political best interest.

Your last paragraph is both unintentionally hilarious and outrageously false.


Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.