« The Rules And Bylaws Committee Meeting: Half And Half | Main | Obama's Healthy, A Letter From His Doc Says »

John McCain Is Responsible For Getting Out Of His Predicament

29 May 2008 11:52 am

The corollary to the argument that John McCain is not entirely responsible for his political predicament is that he and his campaign are entirely responsible for getting out of it.

Option 0: Focus. Stop the scatter shot, hyper-zig-zag appeal to the base one day, appeal to moderates the next day. Spend much less time on foreign policy -- it seems as if McCain spends 60% of his time on Iraq, 30% on other foreign policy issues, and 10% of time on domestic policy. Change the ratio: spend 50% of your time on reform, 30% on energy and economic security, and 20% on Iraq and foreign policy.

Drawback: McCain's comfort zone would need to significantly enlarged.

Option 1: Truly, madly, deeply distance yourself from President Bush by way of policy distinctions on a subject other than climate change; stop respectfully disagreeing with the 27% President and start angrily disagreeing with him -- after all, Americans are angry about the direction of the country. They do not "respectfully" disagree with the President like you do.

Drawback: Though Republican conservatives have, say the polls, found their way to McCain, they drool much less than liberal Democrats do over their own nominee. The more daylight between McCain and Bush, the theory goes, the less enthusiastic the Republican base will be. Also: the angrier McCain gets, the more he turns moderate Republican and independent women off.

Option 2
: Unleash the guns. Go after Obama's patriotism frontally; pronounce Michelle Obama fair game; play the race card; demagogue gays; turn the race into a 2004-esque series of cultural contrasts.

Drawbacks: It's (a) not clear that this works anymore, even as a way to gin up the Republican base; (b) it would completely violate every principle McCain stands for; (c) it would irrevocably alienate crossover women; (d) the Tennessee Republican Party and various 527 groups will do this anyway.

Option 3: Get rid of some of your senior advisers; purge every former lobbyist from your payroll; make a clean start. This would send the message that McCain "gets" it. It would create an expectation of a new beginning, allowing McCain to do something bold on policy, potentially.

Drawbacks: It's not clear whether McCain would be any happier; there are many personal entanglements that would have to be straitened out before certain advisers are brought back aboard; the media might cover the news as evidence of a campaign in permanent flux;

Option 4
: Solve the women problem. It's an open secret in Republican and Democratic circles that less ideological Republican women and independent women are openly disdainful of John McCain in focus groups; they find him angry; they don't believe that he's equipped with the proper temperament to do the job. McCain can't win Pennsylvania this way unless he somehow manages to turn out white men in record numbers. The solution: appoint Tom Ridge to the ticket; appear on Oprah and Ellen once a week; appoint himself as permanent co-host of the View; buy ads on Bravo and Lifetime; Or, try to scare these women into thinking that Barack Obama is so dangerously inexperienced that his election will render their lives all the more insecure and unstable. Or, appear with your children; open up your private life some more.

Drawbacks: McCain's going to have to tackle this problem at some point unless he intends on running as, or winning as, the candidate of white men.

Option 5: Don't panic. McCain's not in a predicament. Barack Obama faces a tough electoral college map. His enthusiastic supports in New York and California and New Jersey and Illinois will drive up his popular vote margins but don't really translate, at this point, into solid strength in the states that will determine the election. Narrow the message a bit, stop giving all those policy speeches, start giving three town hall meetings a day, and see what happens.

Drawback: Campaign strategists who don't panic? That violates every precept of evolutionary psychology. And even if the campaign is calm, the concentric circles of interest outsiders will continue to panic.

Option 6: A game-changer. Pledge to serve for only one term. Appoint your veep pick early. Do something creative with public financing. Propose some new policy that takes your allies and your opponents by surprise. Challenge Obama to weekly debates.

Drawback: Campaigns are consensus-based and risk averse.

Comments (9)

McCain is a looser and will always be a looser. He does not have clear convictions. One day he is against Bush tax-cuts the next day he is for it. One day he is against torture the next day he is for torture. One day he is for Hagee-Falwell-Robertson the next day he is against them. Where is the real McCain?

McCain is more pro-Iraq war than even Bush and Cheney. It is McCain's war and he wants to continue it. Just fear mongering will not help. People have become smarter.

McCain is AGAINST women's right to choose. This will destroy him among independent women.

This is a change election and McCain is not change, instead he is McBush.

"Barack Obama faces a tough electoral college map . . ."

Where do you get this stuff? Have you actually been looking at how the polls have been shifting as the nomination process closes? This isn't even going to be close: Obama will win 300+ electoral votes. He'll get the normal post-primary bounce and he'll build from there. You need to read this article. It sums up how the election will play out much better than you:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/obamas-path-to-victory-in_b_103880.html

This "Obama has a tough electoral map" meme which has been permeating the media is just so incredibly laughable. I can't wait for the media to eat their shoes come November.

Ambinder's biggest howler was posted on May 28th: "We all await Karl Rove's memoir. It will be the first (and only, to date) sustained defense of the intersection of policy and politics of the Bush Administration."

"We all await Rove's memoir"? Who is this "we"? You and the kool-aid drinkers at NRO's Corner? Do you not realize that 99.9% of everything that Rove says is false?

Ambinder is a Republican. He is not a part of the reality-based community.

Hello, Marc, commenters-

Thank you for temporarily reopening comments. Particularly on such a detailed post. I had some assorted and sundry thoughts on a couple of Marc's ideas:

1) Tom Ridge as a VP pick.

As with all VPs, there is an upside and a downside. The upside would be a presumed marginal improvement of McCain's odds of winning in Pennsylvania, a state which Obama must probably carry to win nationally - its 21 electoral votes would be difficult to replace.

The downside would be that Ridge's selection would violate three different principles of traditional selection -

a) distancing from unpopular members of your own party;

b) DC insider/DC outsider,

c) young/old.

d)

1) Although Ridge is a wildly popular, former two-term governor of Pennsylvania, he is most commonly associated (at the national level) with his service as the first Homeland Security Secretary - and thus a link to George W. Bush, from whom McCain must distance himself as much as possible.

2) Ridge is a heroic, decorated Vietnam veteran who served in Congress and in DC for a good while - just like McCain.

Like McCain, he was also a member of the House - McCain had two terms there before being elected to the Senate in 1986.) Ridge hasn't been in Congress since 1994, but his stint as Homeland Security chief makes him look like another DC, security-credentialed type - something that McCain, who has been in Congress for a quarter-of-a-century, would prefer not to reinforce.

3) There's also the age issue. Ridge is 62 years old and will turn 63, ironically, on August 27, right before the GOP convention (h/t Wikipedia) in Minnesota. Although still nearly a decade younger than McCain, a 63-year-old VP candidate might not send the right message, as it would give Jay Leno's writers some more material.

But let's look at the pluses:

Ridge would be young enough to serve as president if McCain were incapacitated, but has sufficiently strong gravitas and ability to serve as a great safety choice, if he were to enter the Oval Office. It would dispel many concerns about McCain's health, if he had a solid backup like Ridge.

Moreover, he would be younger than McCain - but not SO much younger, as to make McCain look really old in comparison.

In terms of tipping Pennsylvania-

Ridge's presence certainly couldn't hurt. Moreover, Ridge's old House district is based in and around Erie, a Democratic city but one which backed him by a huge margin when he ran for governor twice in the 1990s. Having a veep who could help in Great Lakes, Rust Belt cities such as Erie. It's not likely that Northwest Pennsylvania could provide enough of a margin to tip the state overall, though.

Rewarding Ridge for loyalty would also be a strong message that McCain remembers his friends and allies. Ridge served as honorary national co-chair for McCain and stuck with him during the nadir of the campaign's implosion and collapse in the summer and fall of 2007.

He's also conducted himself on the national stage for a very long time, and is thus unlikely to commit the sort of gaffe(s) that might blow the campaign off-message, a la Dan Quayle.

Looking at some of Marc's other ideas in Options 5 and 6:

I agree on Marc's advice: "Don't panic." There are still 159 days to go. (The time to panic, if there was one, was back in the fall and summer of last year.) It doesn't mean that the McCain team shouldn't be concerned with the national climate for any Republican running (one look at those House elections makes that very clear). Or about Obama's huge edge in money AND organization, due to the campaign's own prodigious fundraising.

As for some of the risky strategies in Option 6:

Obviously, "doing something creative with public financing" could apply to a wide variety of ideas. Certainly, the best thing that McCain could do, would be to try to hold Obama to the public-money pledge he made last year.

Pledging to serve only one term is dicier. I don't think it would make sense, unless McCain has already privately determined to do precisely that (in other words, if he only wants to serve one term, anyhow, he might as well take political credit for a "Cincinnatus-at-the-plow" strategy of voluntarily renouncing power.)

Appointing the Veep early - I don't know about this, as the veepstakes speculation does give McCain some free media that he can use, particularly so due to the Democratic endgame that has taken so long to resolve (and remains unresolved).

Challenging Obama to weekly debates would be a great idea, which I think carries NO downside and tons of upside. Obama's huge money advantage could be offset somewhat, by the bonanza of free media that weekly debates could provide. Also, McCain loves doing unscripted, risky stuff. He gets burned on this, occasionally, such as the now-infamous 100-years-in-Iraq quote), but it plays very much to his strengths.

Thoughts are welcome.

I like what you say about Ridge. We may need a capable military given the Iran challenge. We seem to be facing some complex economic challenges and meeting them and providing money for the military would be benefited by having a capable businessman/economist in the VP which is why I would like to see Michael Bloomberg chosen. I wonder how he would affect McCain's electoral and demographic challenges? Condi also seems a possibility give the problems you present.

Ridge would be a disaster for McCain. There's no way he'd escape the color-coded comedy charts he created. His PA record would be irrelevant.

He seems to be doing a mix of these things.

You left out one option: He should start talking about how things are going in America and shut the hell up for a day or two about how things are going in Iraq. You'd think he was running for Iraqi president the way he goes on and on and on about Iraq.

I'm really glad he thinks things are going good there and I'm really glad he's proud of his military service, but he is running for President of the USA and that job has a lot more to it than just military duties.

Alaska Gov Sarah Palin’s got more real experience, qualfications and actual accomplishment then Obama and Hillary combined, so Palin’s selection as Veep won’t detract from hammering Obama’s lack of it.

If it looks like it’s going to be McCain/Palin anyway (and that should be a “no brainer” for Team McCain), McCain should announce NOW or VERY SOON, rather than later towards the convention. There’s currently a growing chorus for Obama/Hillary (as VP) ticket (in fact the Dems are likely aware of the Palin phenomenon). If the GOP waits while movement for Hillary as VP grows — even worse until after it is solidified that Hillary will/could be VP pick — selecting Palin will be portrayed by Dems/liberal media more as a reaction by GOP selecting its own female (overshawdoing Palin’s own remarkable assets), rather than McCain taking the lead on this. Selecting Palin now or early (contrary to the punditocracy) will mean McCain will be seen as driving the course of this campaign overwhelmingly, and the DEMS will be seen as merely reacting. And, there’s absoultely no down-side to this because even if Hillary is a no-go as VP for Obama, the GOP gains by acting early. McCain the maverick. Palin the maverick. Do it now!

There’s no reason, and actually substantial negative, in McCain waiting to see what the Dems do first insofar as his picking Palin as VP, because, no matter who Obama picks, Palin is by far (and I mean far) the best pick for McCain and the GOP, especially in this time of GOP woes. The GOP can be seen as the party of real ‘change’ (albeit I hate that mantra, change, change, bla bla), while not really having to change from GOP core conservative values, which Palin more than represents.

In light of the current oil/energy situation, as well as the disaffected female Hillary voters situation, and growing focus on McCain’s age and health, Palin is more than perfect — now.

(Perhaps Team McCain is already on to this.)

After Obama's maniacal preacher problem ... the real question is will Obama tie:

1. Dukakis
2. Mondale
3. McGovern
4. or the second try for the Peanut Farmer?

It will be a landslide over the sexist/racist Obama!